US Officially Justifying "Al Qaeda" Terrorist Attacks in Syria

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the "US practically justified terrorism" when it refused to condemn the recent bombings in Damascus which were responsible for killing both Syrian officials and civilians.

I suppose that as long as the Al Qaeda terrorists are working for us, killing who we say, it's ok, they are just "rebels. It's only when the same Al Qaeda terrorists attack American interests, then they are terrorists.

Doesn't anyone find this to be just a little bit hypocritical?


[link to www.youtube.com]
youtube.com/watch?v=Cx2AMW7ie3A

Al Qaeda Taking Deadly New Role in Syria Conflict “We are now forming suicide cells to make jihad"
CAIRO — It is the sort of image that has become a staple of the Syrian revolution, a video of masked men calling themselves the Free Syrian Army and brandishing AK-47s — with one unsettling difference. In the background hang two flags of Al Qaeda, white Arabic writing on a black field.

“We are now forming suicide cells to make jihad in the name of God,” said a speaker in the video using the classical Arabic favored by Al Qaeda.

[link to www.nytimes.com]

I do. Why did not the Washington regime support the Iranian people in Persia (Iran)during their wonderful attempt to free themselves? In my opinion the reason for that was... they did not want that country to change. It was the regime that suited the Muslim Brotherhood, it suited Washington also.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the "US practically justified terrorism" when it refused to condemn the recent bombings in Damascus which were responsible for killing both Syrian officials and civilians.

I suppose that as long as the Al Qaeda terrorists are working for us, killing who we say, it's ok, they are just "rebels". It's only when the same Al Qaeda terrorists attack American interests, then they are terrorists.

Doesn't anyone find this to be just a little bit hypocritical?


[link to www.youtube.com]
youtube.com/watch?v=Cx2AMW7ie3A

Time for a fucking Regime Change, hey...

Both sides hate us. If the rebels / Sunni Muslims win, they'll eventually come after the US. They'll start first against Christians, jewish people, and right wingers. After this, they'll then target the remaining groups, atheists, other religions, all non-muslims / kuffar / infidels, and finally they'll go after the very people who helped them, the left. Proof? History

Choosing between Sunni or Shia is like choosing between the idiot and the fool; both sects come from the same cult called Islam.

America tends to support Sunni governments in the Middle East (e.g., Saudi Arabia), in part because of its enmity to Iran and Hizbullah. But the US policy in the Middle East, as I'm sure you know, is short-term expediency, and even that is done badly!

(Oh btw, in case anyone failed to realize it, Al-Qaeda is Sunni!)

My position on this is simple, when political regimes (US or anyone else) support radical terrorist groups like Al Qaeda, Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah etc.. the regime is just as much of a terrorist as the guys blowing themselves up!

With all that said - whoever backs these groups whether politically, financially or with weapons and training, should be boycotted & or exterminated! After all, seems they're the main reasons why we have these constant wars and terrorism to begin with.

Problem is just - how do we know who's behind them? We can go after all these jihadi terrorists and groups as much as we want, it's like a factory supply line, they just keep coming. Seriously, the people who enable them with all the means I said above is who we need to go after! Once the head is cut, we can finish off the body and it should stop. In a perfect world that is!

Remember 'jihadi terrorists' is a politically correct term. Radical Muslims, are actually very devout Muslims, who follow all the scriptures of the Quran and Hadiths, the peaceful and violent. The problem isn't a radical group, the problem is Islam itself.

805 of U.S. Mosques Teach Violence [which is merely true Islam]:
[link to www.humanevents.com]

The vid shows proof that 'moderate' Muslims support 'radical' / devout Muslims.

You can't throw millions of people in the same bucket with jihadis. If that was true, I should be long dead by now. Trust me, there ARE moderate Muslims, the one's getting involved in a radical teaching and the Hadith's are radical, yet not all are going out killing or attacking people for their different believes. There IS a difference.

Same could be said about the christians who believe there's bible prophecy being fulfilled with Syria, some that want this to happen. They are radical too. Same goes to the jewish people that support this. Also radicals. Does that mean we kill ALL people then that belong to a religious establishment of Judaism, Christianity and Islam? Please...Your view btw could also be categorized as radical. I remember several incidents like that in history, lets not repeat that scenario.

You can't throw millions of people in the same bucket with jihadis. If that was true, I should be long dead by now. Trust me, there ARE moderate Muslims, the one's getting involved in a radical teaching and the Hadith's are radical, yet not all are going out killing or attacking people for their different believes. There IS a difference.

Same could be said about the christians who believe there's bible prophecy being fulfilled with Syria, some that want this to happen. They are radical too. Same goes to the jewish people that support this. Also radicals. Does that mean we kill ALL people then that belong to a religious establishment of Judaism, Christianity and Islam? Please...Your view btw could also be categorized as radical. I remember several incidents like that in history, lets not repeat that scenario.

What 'moderate' / non-devout Muslims, don't realize, is that the devout Muslims, will also attack them, and yes kill them as well, if they too aren't devout. This will occur, more frequently, when the majority of the 'radical' / devout Muslims enemies are eliminated. There's several incidence to prove this.

If you took time to watch the vid, please explain to me then, why the majority of 'moderate' Muslims, are sending funds, are knowlingly funding a 'radical' / devout group?

And why our 80% of mosques in the US teaching violence?

Let's say, that 2 out 10, Muslims are truly peaceful and moderate, do we then allow all Muslims, into the country. If you allow them all in, this is allowing the trojan horse into the country, and this is why there will indeed be an 'Arab Spring' in every country, if we continue this path.

Question:

Does the Quran really contain dozens of verses promoting violence?


Summary Answer:

The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

[link to www.thereligionofpeace.com]


Let me give this analogy. There are 10 murderers. 2 of those 10 murderers, are truly peaceful. You don't which ones they are. Do you allow all the murderers into your home, since you know two of the 10, are truly peaceful and moderate?

You are giving very strange statistics, where do you get them from?

Most U.S. Mosques Teach Violence

By: Robert Spencer
6/14/2011 03:01 AM

RESIZE: AAA
Print

Last week came new confirmation that mosques in the U.S. aren’t quite holding potluck suppers and teaching civic pieties. A new study has demonstrated that 80% of mosques right in this country are teaching jihad warfare and Islamic supremacism.

Researchers Mordechai Kedar and David Yerushalmi reported in the Summer 2011 issue of Middle East Quarterly about a new survey that found that “51% of mosques had texts that either advocated the use of violence in the pursuit of a Sharia-based political order or advocated violent jihad as a duty that should be of paramount importance to a Muslim.” Another 30% of mosques in the United States “had only texts that were moderately supportive of violence,” while only “19% had no violent texts at all.”

This yet again contradicts the universally held assumption that U.S. mosques are completely benign institutions, in all respects equivalent to churches and synagogues. As long ago as 1998, Sheikh Muhammad Hisham Kabbani, a Sufi leader, visited 114 mosques in the United States. Then he gave testimony before a State Department open forum in January 1999 declaring that Islamic supremacists controlled most mosques in America .

“The most dangerous thing that is going on now in these mosques,” Kabbani said, “that has been sent upon these mosques around the United States—like churches they were established by different organizations and that is okay—but the problem with our communities is the extremist ideology. Because they are very active, they took over the mosques, and we can say that they took over more than 80% of the mosques that have been established in the U.S. And there are more than 3,000 mosques in the U.S. So it means that the methodology or ideology of extremists has been spread to 80% of the Muslim population, but not all of them agree with it.”

Terrorism expert Yehudit Barsky affirmed the same thing in 2005, saying that 80% of the mosques in this country “have been radicalized by Saudi money and influence.” The Center for Religious Freedom in 2005 found a massive distribution of hateful jihadist and Islamic supremacist material in mosques in this country. The Mapping Sharia Project’s 2008 study likewise found that upwards of 80% of mosques in America were preaching hatred of jewish people and Christians and the necessity ultimately to impose Islamic rule.

And in June 2008, federal investigators found that the Islamic Saudi Academy in Virginia, despite promises to stop teaching such material, was still using books that advocated that apostates from Islam be executed and that it was permissible for Muslims to kill and seize the property of “polytheists.”

What is most arresting about these studies is their unanimity. Although each was conducted independently of the others, they all came to the same conclusion: that around three-quarters of mosques in this country are teaching what amounts to sedition. And yet the mainstream media has shown about as much interest in the new survey as they did in the others—that is, none at all.

Maybe they figure that it could be worse. After all, in recent years we have seen mosques used to preach hatred, to spread exhortations to terrorist activity, to house a bomb factory, to store weapons, to disseminate messages from Osama bin Laden, to demand that non-Muslims conform to Islamic dietary restrictions, to fire on American troops, to fire upon Indian troops and to train jihadists. But most of that took place outside the United States, so who cares? We know the mosques inside this country are different! And on what do we base this certainty? Why, nothing, nothing at all except for the bland and smiling assurances of Muslim leaders in this country that mosques are simply places of worship, no more, no less, and that anyone who thinks otherwise is a greasy Islamophobe.

It is time to be more realistic. At the very least, reporters all over the country should be asking pointed questions of local mosque leaders about the books they’re using and what they’re teaching in general. And they should call on them to give honest, verifiable answers.

It is more likely, however, that this study, like the others, will simply be ignored. But don’t let that happen. Call upon your elected officials and the media to take notice of this new survey. Our freedoms depend on it.

[link to www.humanevents.com]

Let me get a bit conspiracy theorist now on this.

I find it quite amazing that the most radical forms of any religion, especially Islam for this example, always seems arise outside of their original countries. Who are these people? Why are they there? Again, we can't throw everyone in the same bucket because I have plenty of egyptian friends, mostly muslim, who live in various countries abroad and are adapted to those countries, most even never visited a Mosque there. But the one's that do and would get involved in these kinds of radical teachings, I see an agenda there as well.

If that is the case and this study is true, I would say those Imam's or Clerics should be warned, Members who follow radical teachings should be monitored - if anyone acts threatening or violent, deport their asses to Saudi Arabia, imo, the cesspool of radical Islam (Whabism). You might want to google that too and see who came up with that cult and for what reason ;)

Let me get a bit conspiracy theorist now on this.

I find it quite amazing that the most radical forms of any religion, especially Islam for this example, always seems arise outside of their original countries. Who are these people? Why are they there? Again, we can't throw everyone in the same bucket because I have plenty of egyptian friends, mostly muslim, who live in various countries abroad and are adapted to those countries, most even never visited a Mosque there. But the one's that do and would get involved in these kinds of radical teachings, I see an agenda there as well.

If that is the case and this study is true, I would say those Imam's or Clerics should be warned, Members who follow radical teachings should be monitored - if anyone acts threatening or violent, deport their asses to Saudi Arabia, imo, the cesspool of radical Islam (Whabism). You might want to google that too and see who came up with that cult and for what reason ;)

So Rambo and the CIA, wrote the Quran?

Question:

Does the Quran really contain dozens of verses promoting violence?


Summary Answer:

The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

[link to www.thereligionofpeace.com]