Déjà vu

Furthermore, several lines of evidence make it
likely that temporal binding is highly relevant for scene
segmentation, leading to structured representation of
sensory inputs. A key observation supporting this notion
is that neuronal synchronization depends on the
stimulus configuration. Thus, spatially separate cells
show strong synchronization only if they respond to the
same object. However, if responding to two independent
stimuli moving in different directions, the cells fire in a
less correlated manner or even without any fixed
temporal relationship. This effect has been documented

sleeping & waking

[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

To my mother dearest,

you will never know who i am

:hierophant:

[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

[link to www.youtube.com]

what! you've haven't had your V8

[link to www.youtube.com]

What is the difference between causally related and causally unrelated sequences?

What is the difference between causally related and causally unrelated sequences?

as it relates to synchronicity none. synchronicity is not bound by probabilities. it is a meshing void of a physical origin.

memory and sleep video

scientist always look for what they can hope to explain. what they cannot hope to explain they ignore as if it doesn't exist.

why do people replay dreams? dreams that have no basis in a waking reality, yet the memories of places and content of those dreams are replayed inside another dream. why do people that have no training in music or art create music and art in their dreams. they were never trained or taught these things and yet while dreaming they perform as if they had. scientist will not attempt to quantify something that they cannot explain, yet they have no problems quantifying material that has little impact or relevance to the true nature of the subject.

the true nature of dreams is that we do what is not possible in them.