Magnetic Stars: Rebuttal to Max Planck Institute (Advanced Draft Release: The Grant Chronicles) | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60215 Canada 01/05/2006 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've never seen you argue the points here. You just come in and antagonize, like a fruit fly. It's like you really don't understand what's being discussed but would very much like to. If you can answer, I'm very curious about this. User ID # 6330 does this same thing. Are you he too? |
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 2782 United States 01/05/2006 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "I am behind Nancy 100%" That's true... Nancy will always be ahead of you. "I've never seen you argue the points here. You just come in and antagonize, like a fruit fly." Kind of a funny question coming from someone who doesn't apparently understand what Grant is talking about and doesn't bother to back him up. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Grant NLI (OP) User ID: 2199 United States 01/05/2006 03:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cb you haven't got a clue you wouldn't dare step out on the plank like Krill did to defend a position would you. Just like a coward wants the fame, but hides in the shadows of other's work. They have a name for you, worthless piece of . Please don't even suggest you know anything about stellar development and nebula, because I will call you on it. Now get lost. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60230 United Kingdom 01/05/2006 05:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Please don't even suggest you know anything about stellar development and nebula, because I will call you on it. Now get lost." Grant, that's one of the most ironic things I've seen you post in a long time. You get "called" on your understanding of science over and over again, and you NEVER answer - you just dance around avoiding the issues. Maybe you can give us your explanation of stellar development... |
Grant NLI (OP) User ID: 2199 United States 01/05/2006 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 2782 United States 01/05/2006 05:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Grant NLI (OP) User ID: 2199 United States 01/05/2006 06:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 2782 United States 01/05/2006 06:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No problem, Grant. Just let us know when you're going to start and I'll jump right on in. Thus far, Krill has already made some very valid arguments to which you continue to dodge and evade, which we're quite used to by the way, and I wouldn't want to cause you to go into overload Dim one. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60277 Canada 01/05/2006 06:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good question for CB. One that I see he went around answering. Let's ask it again. Circuit Breaker I have a question for you. What is your education level? I've never seen you argue the points here. You just come in and antagonize, like a fruit fly. It's like you really don't understand what's being discussed but would very much like to. If you can answer, I'm very curious about this. User ID # 6330 does this same thing. Are you he too? |
Bored Huge Krill nli User ID: 55138 United States 01/05/2006 07:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Waffling again what is the basis for the fossil field theory Krill???????? Using your own words go read it. Then come back and answer the question." I have read it Grant - if you remember I quoted you from it a while back. Let's recap: Research gets published, explaining how something could work. Without reading it, but instead only reading the press release announcing it, you write a "reply" saying they've got it all wrong and it doesn't work. Other people who have read it can't see anything wrong with it. You demand that they explain it to you, whilst maintaining that you're right, even though you don't know anything about it *because you still haven't read it* I've read it, and quoted from it. Now you go read it, and I'll answer questions about it. Ok? Regards Krill |
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 2782 United States 01/05/2006 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny ID 60277...I don't see you contributing anything. It's like you don't understand what's being discussed but come here because you have nothing better to do. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 60291 United Kingdom 01/05/2006 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "I've read it, and quoted from it. Now you go read it, and I'll answer questions about it. Ok?" I predict you'll wait a long, long time for that to happen. Firstly, Grant doesn't "do research", so he's not likely to read the actual article (although he feels able to respond to what he imagines it says). And secondly, he wouldn't understand 90% of it it anyway, since he operates on Nancy-style pseudo-science, or kindergarten-level-science. |
Grant
(OP) User ID: 18760 United States 01/05/2006 09:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Without reading it, but instead only reading the press release announcing it, you write a "reply" saying they've got it all wrong and it doesn't work. Other people who have read it can't see anything wrong with it. You demand that they explain it to you, whilst maintaining that you're right, even though you don't know anything about it *because you still haven't read it* I've read it, and quoted from it. Now you go read it, and I'll answer questions about it. Ok? You Krill I always though there was hope for you just like Jonathan, although he failed. Now are you going to make the same mistake? It is all right to reject a theory, but we want to know why? You said you read it and I did not, so you have an assumed advantaged. Now enough of you BS, now explain why you think the Max Planck Institute is right on how magnetic white dwarfs inherit their magnetic field. I don’t want you to say I have not read it, still waffling, because I am well versed, now state your support and I will respond with a technical rebuttal. I think your full of it and bluffing, still playing the same games of the past, but this Grant is not the same as 2003. Now if you want you can use the Orion constellation and its nebula as a basis. |
Grant
(OP) User ID: 18760 United States 01/05/2006 10:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Postman please shut up, do you ever contribute anything other than insults enough of that dead cat look, it’s disgusting. By the way do you even know about stellar objects? NO, your only experience was when the doctor dropped you on your head birth and this vision was implanted in your mind |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 18760 United States 01/05/2006 11:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Bored Huge Krill nli User ID: 55138 United States 01/06/2006 12:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Very simple: their theory is that starting with random electromagnetic fields, which will necessarily exist at the ignition of a gigantic nuclear fusion reaction, in some cases it will collapse into a stable magnetic field, the characteristics of which they describe in detail. They used a number of large magnetohydrodynamic simulations to show that this is so. "I don’t want you to say I have not read it, still waffling, because I am well versed, now state your support and I will respond with a technical rebuttal." See above. But I don't see how you claim to be "well versed" in something you haven't even read. That isn't remotely coherent. So go on then, tell us why you think their analysis (which you haven't read) is wrong. Regards Krill |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6330 United States 01/06/2006 01:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 2782 United States 01/06/2006 07:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Grant, 6330 brings up a valid point. If you're "100% behind" Nancy, which infers you believe everything she says, how can you then also admit that the Earth has NOT halted in orbit, a claim she has been making for two years? Another thing, Grant. What lab equipment do you have? What proven scientific methods to you use to arrive at your "brilliant" conclusions? And if your theories are correct and everyone else's are wrong, why are you not published in Scientific American or any other science related media? A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
User # 78/68
User ID: 60519 Canada 01/06/2006 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I liked this question. And it looks like Circuit Broken is afraid to answer it. Is this enough proof that he and Dr (insert laugh here) Postman are as uneducated as they come. These two guys only come here to bother you Grant. They don't have any idea and are probably only high school educated. Science is only a seven letter word to them. Good question for CB. One that I see he went around answering. Let's ask it again. Circuit Breaker I have a question for you. What is your education level? I've never seen you argue the points here. You just come in and antagonize, like a fruit fly. It's like you really don't understand what's being discussed but would very much like to. If you can answer, I'm very curious about this. User ID # 6330 does this same thing. Are you he too? |
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 2782 United States 01/06/2006 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not afraid to answer. I just decided I would dodge and evade like your heros Grant and Nancy. But since you're obviously obsessed, I have a four year degree thank you. Now, I've never seen you answer any questions, so I'll ask some now. What level of high school did you complete before you dropped out? Second, and I've asked this before but you either ignore it or you're afraid to answer: How many years have to pass before you finally get the clue that "Planet X" doesn't exist? I'd really like to hear your response. So far you keep ignoring the question. BTW, where's a good quality photograph of "Planet X" Mr. Expert Photographer? A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 2782 United States 01/06/2006 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 2199 United States 01/06/2006 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Bored Huge Krill nli User ID: 55138 United States 01/06/2006 06:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Grant NLI (OP) User ID: 2199 United States 01/06/2006 06:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 2782 United States 01/06/2006 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Bored Huge Krill
User ID: 55138 United States 01/07/2006 11:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6330 United States 01/07/2006 01:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Not that it matters but I've a year of college to go. Grant -- You seem to be contradicdont_use_thisf. -You say you are behind Nancy 100 percent. -You say the Earth is not halted, DIRECTLY contradicting Nancy. Which is true? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6330 United States 01/07/2006 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
User # 78/68
User ID: 60873 Canada 01/07/2006 03:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "I'm not afraid to answer. I just decided I would dodge and evade like your heros Grant and Nancy. But since you're obviously obsessed, I have a four year degree thank you. Now, I've never seen you answer any questions, so I'll ask some now." Now Circuit Breaker who oh why would you modify your post like that. Your original post BEFORE you editted it said your degree was in meteorology and electronics (give me a break!). Did you think I or we(for anyone else) didn't already see this? Now, why would you take these points out? Caught you in another one, didn't I? If you are lying about something as simple as your education, it really shows how sad a person you really are. Diploma in electonics doubtful but maybe. Degree in electronics ... no way. Not in my country anyways. |
Circuit Breaker
User ID: 2782 United States 01/07/2006 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "Now Circuit Breaker who oh why would you modify your post like that. Your original post BEFORE you editted it said your degree was in meteorology and electronics" Because I decided it was none of your business what my degrees are in and I wanted to see if you would answer MY QUESTION. Which, I see, you failed to do. So don't get bent when if I refuse to answer any of your questions in the future. You've proven time and time again that you won't do it because you can't.... or you're afraid to. "Caught you in another one, didn't I?" You mean like I caught you with your lie about being an expert photographer? If you're not, then let's see some of your expert photos of "Planet X." A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |