REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
Magnetic Stars: Rebuttal to Max Planck Institute (Advanced Draft Release: The Grant Chronicles)
|
Poster Handle
|
Grant |
Post Content
|
Grant -- before asking questions at others, perhaps you should defend your theory by andwering the criticism that has been levelled against it.
Just a suggestion.
I am defending it. If we are to believe Krill and Deacon the metal in its solid form once it passes the Curie temperature and melts ferromagnetic properties stabilize, BS. The molecular movement that disrupts magnetic properties in a solid is also present in an even hotter liquid. The point is gaseous nebulas can not be the basis for stellar magnetars, because they did not retain a magnetic field.
CB shut up and go back to your postal job.
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|