You post refers to *ferromagnetism* which is a property of some materials which can retain a level of magnetism in a static, equilibrium state. This occurs in what you would commonly call "a magnet". It doesn't refer to clouds of gas or dust. Nobody except you has suggested that magnetism in stars or clouds of dusts is due to them being ferromagnets. It's due to them being electrically charged and in motion.

Your description of magnetism not being possible in a cloud of gas and dust above the "Curie point" is nonsense, because ferromagnetism and Curie temperatures relate only to very specific solid magnetic materials. Hence, your whole article is nonsense.

Is it nonsense, can you recreate conditions here on Earth, no. Have our instruments detected nebulas capable of creating immense magnetic fields without a source of energy? Are you trying to apply a dynamo theory to a cloud of gas? Is the motion organized in a nebula, no, what would the gravitational reference of rotation. If the cloud is expanding then charges would be dissipating. Listen to yourself Krill.

Regards
Krill