"Is it nonsense, can you recreate conditions here on Earth, no. Have our instruments detected nebulas capable of creating immense magnetic fields without a source of energy? Are you trying to apply a dynamo theory to a cloud of gas? Is the motion organized in a nebula, no, what would the gravitational reference of rotation. If the cloud is expanding then charges would be dissipating. Listen to yourself Krill."

Obviously we haven't recreated the conditions here on Earth - except in a simulation, which is the best we can practically do.

You still haven't addressed the central point - your misapplication of ferromagnetism to a cloud. Everything you derive from that is nonsense.

The two competing theories under discussion are dynamo based or fossil field based. One is based on a mechanically rotating charged cloud, the other (as far as I understand it, but I'm willing to be corrected) on a resonant stable electromagnetic wave (which itself moves the charged particles around, but in an oscillatory fashion). Incidentally, it doesn't show the overall electromagnetic energy increasing - it shows the overall energy decreasing due to resistive effects in the conductive cloud.

Neither has anything to do with ferromagnetism, and hence your criticism of either as not conforming to the principles of ferromagnetism is nonsense. When are you going to stop blowing smoke and acknowledge this?

Regards
Krill