Without reading it, but instead only reading the press release announcing it, you write a "reply" saying they've got it all wrong and it doesn't work.

Other people who have read it can't see anything wrong with it.

You demand that they explain it to you, whilst maintaining that you're right, even though you don't know anything about it *because you still haven't read it*

I've read it, and quoted from it. Now you go read it, and I'll answer questions about it. Ok?

You Krill I always though there was hope for you just like Jonathan, although he failed. Now are you going to make the same mistake? It is all right to reject a theory, but we want to know why? You said you read it and I did not, so you have an assumed advantaged. Now enough of you BS, now explain why you think the Max Planck Institute is right on how magnetic white dwarfs inherit their magnetic field. I don’t want you to say I have not read it, still waffling, because I am well versed, now state your support and I will respond with a technical rebuttal. I think your full of it and bluffing, still playing the same games of the past, but this Grant is not the same as 2003. Now if you want you can use the Orion constellation and its nebula as a basis.