Grant,

6330 brings up a valid point. If you're "100% behind" Nancy, which infers you believe everything she says, how can you then also admit that the Earth has NOT halted in orbit, a claim she has been making for two years?

Another thing, Grant. What lab equipment do you have? What proven scientific methods to you use to arrive at your "brilliant" conclusions? And if your theories are correct and everyone else's are wrong, why are you not published in Scientific American or any other science related media?