My Husband Directed The Fake Moon Landing Says Stanley Kubrick's Widow. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21639970 United States 08/12/2012 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | He of course paid with his life. |
FubarMan
User ID: 20621002 United States 08/12/2012 10:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Chuckle. What do you mean "we"? You mean that the same bureaucracy that gave us the "moon landings" before is now giving us that same story again. Let's review our Science 101, History 101, and Law 101: Scientists require independent reproducibility. Historians require independent corroboration. Courts require sworn testimony under cross-examination. NASA has provided us with none of these. Ok here is a quick reputable experiment that is replicated. Universities all over the world use the mirrors left behind to measure the average movement of the moon away from the earth each year. |
FubarMan
User ID: 20621002 United States 08/12/2012 10:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | never went to the moon. kubrick also made eyes wide shut to show what the rich powerful families do in their free time. the movie The Shining was all about the apollo 11 moon landing. Research it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21639970 He of course paid with his life. The Shining was about the Apollo 11 moon landing? It is leaps of logic such as this that tends to take away credibility for the hoaxers. I am at a loss to understand the insanity in such a statement. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21786571 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Chuckle. What do you mean "we"? You mean that the same bureaucracy that gave us the "moon landings" before is now giving us that same story again. Let's review our Science 101, History 101, and Law 101: Scientists require independent reproducibility. Historians require independent corroboration. Courts require sworn testimony under cross-examination. NASA has provided us with none of these. Ok here is a quick reputable experiment that is replicated. Universities all over the world use the mirrors left behind to measure the average movement of the moon away from the earth each year. i keep hearing this one about the laser reflecting mirros... never have i seen a picture of one or ever seen someone outside of the industry use them... besides they could have been placed there by machines not men. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21786571 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 10:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | never went to the moon. kubrick also made eyes wide shut to show what the rich powerful families do in their free time. the movie The Shining was all about the apollo 11 moon landing. Research it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21639970 He of course paid with his life. The Shining was about the Apollo 11 moon landing? It is leaps of logic such as this that tends to take away credibility for the hoaxers. I am at a loss to understand the insanity in such a statement. which hoaxers ? nasa? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21786571 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 10:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11696035 Canada 08/12/2012 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As we again study the surface on the moon we find our previous landing sites. Quoting: FubarMan [link to www.youtube.com] We have satellites capable of seeing scratches on a penny on earth from orbit. We spend billions in stupid shit every year. We can't send one of those satellites to the moon. suuuuuuuuuuuuuure |
Skeptic the First
User ID: 21309323 United States 08/12/2012 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Universities all over the world use the mirrors left behind to measure the average movement of the moon away from the earth each year. Quoting: FubarMan Chuckle. The Soviets left mirrors on the moon, too. Are you asserting that the Soviets secretly landed on the moon as well? [link to en.wikipedia.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21786571 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 10:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Universities all over the world use the mirrors left behind to measure the average movement of the moon away from the earth each year. Quoting: FubarMan Chuckle. The Soviets left mirrors on the moon, too. Are you asserting that the Soviets secretly landed on the moon as well? [link to en.wikipedia.org] exactly no evidence whatsoever that proves we have ever landed a human on the moon and returned them to earth. |
FubarMan
User ID: 20621002 United States 08/12/2012 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Universities all over the world use the mirrors left behind to measure the average movement of the moon away from the earth each year. Quoting: FubarMan Chuckle. The Soviets left mirrors on the moon, too. Are you asserting that the Soviets secretly landed on the moon as well? [link to en.wikipedia.org] No I am not making that assertion, neither did the soviets. Very silly argument to my facts. |
FubarMan
User ID: 20621002 United States 08/12/2012 11:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Universities all over the world use the mirrors left behind to measure the average movement of the moon away from the earth each year. Quoting: FubarMan Chuckle. The Soviets left mirrors on the moon, too. Are you asserting that the Soviets secretly landed on the moon as well? [link to en.wikipedia.org] exactly no evidence whatsoever that proves we have ever landed a human on the moon and returned them to earth. We sent the moon rocks all over the world for study, even to our enemies. Why did they not say the rocks were fakes? MMMMMmmmm? LOL because they were and still are hard evidence. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11696035 Canada 08/12/2012 11:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Universities all over the world use the mirrors left behind to measure the average movement of the moon away from the earth each year. Quoting: FubarMan Chuckle. The Soviets left mirrors on the moon, too. Are you asserting that the Soviets secretly landed on the moon as well? [link to en.wikipedia.org] exactly no evidence whatsoever that proves we have ever landed a human on the moon and returned them to earth. We sent the moon rocks all over the world for study, even to our enemies. Why did they not say the rocks were fakes? MMMMMmmmm? LOL because they were and still are hard evidence. How are moon rocks different from earth rocks again? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21791002 United States 08/12/2012 11:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Chuckle. What do you mean "we"? You mean that the same bureaucracy that gave us the "moon landings" before is now giving us that same story again. Let's review our Science 101, History 101, and Law 101: Scientists require independent reproducibility. Historians require independent corroboration. Courts require sworn testimony under cross-examination. NASA has provided us with none of these. Ok here is a quick reputable experiment that is replicated. Universities all over the world use the mirrors left behind to measure the average movement of the moon away from the earth each year. Read the web site. No mirrors are needed. Think about it like this. How could you possibly even hit a target so small 200,000 miles away? No way. |
Poriwoggu
User ID: 6678126 United States 08/12/2012 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so fubarman explain how this rover got where it is in the picture without leaving any tracks?? [link to bp0.blogger.com] bp0.blogger.com/_7Bqr1I5gzyk/R519Frk7fOI/AAAAAAAAAPM/AcFZK9C3iWc/s1600-h/moon%2520stuff001.jpg can you??! Watch this video. [link to www.youtube.com] You can see the lunar buggy motoring around on the moon. It hard leaves tracks because it is throwing the powdery mix right back in the groove causing it to fill it's tracks. When you watch the video you can barely see the previous tracks. The foot print does not cover its on track with fine dust. You can see the buggy's tracks from the hubble telescope. what about this one then? [link to bp3.blogger.com] bp3.blogger.com/_7Bqr1I5gzyk/R52Qebk7fYI/AAAAAAAAAQc/LU3Zo1f4DnU/s1600-h/moon%2520stuff003.jpg you trying to tell me that even when it comes to a stop it perfectly covers up its own tracks?? are you a retard? It's just the perspective. The shot doesn't include the area behind the front wheel. The lunar terrain is all from under the rover. Show a wide angle shot with the whole rover. If there are so many shots of the trackless rover this should be easy. Update 1:Actually - on looking at the photo - it looks like it was cropped from a larger photo. I'm going to call this an edited photo until someone comes up with a NASA original. Update 2:Counted actual lines of resolution - there are about 160. NASA cameras had 320 lines of resolution so this the 1/4 of the original photo. I'm calling fake on this. Last Edited by Poriwoggu on 08/12/2012 11:34 AM Poriwoggu |
nzreva
(OP) User ID: 19624091 United States 08/12/2012 11:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | your link doesnt work Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21786571 here the working one [link to mountzion144.ning.com] mountzion144.ning.com/profiles/blog/show?id=2127676%3ABlogPost%3A700730 the evidence is compelling fixed it thanks |
Poriwoggu
User ID: 6678126 United States 08/12/2012 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so fubarman explain how this rover got where it is in the picture without leaving any tracks?? [link to bp0.blogger.com] bp0.blogger.com/_7Bqr1I5gzyk/R519Frk7fOI/AAAAAAAAAPM/AcFZK9C3iWc/s1600-h/moon%2520stuff001.jpg can you??! The rover only weighed 441 lbs. On the moon it weighed 73 lbs. That isn't going to leave a deep depression. And show a photo of where the tracks should have been instead of cropping them out of the picture. Poriwoggu |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21796018 United States 08/12/2012 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read that they did both, went to the moon and did the Hollywood stuff. That when on the moon they saw too many things, go ask John Lear again. All in all the sad fact is that no-one believes what our govt and media says anymore about anything. Having Obama nor Romney in is going to make things more honorable for any of us, all they want to do is play war; thing is they are playing with real lives and the people are not being told the truths on that either. Some of you may be into theatrics but many of us despise that as we have taken our lives seriously and expected a higher level of that with those we trusted at one point. |
Mindlouka
User ID: 21794158 Portugal 08/12/2012 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What about these photos? Look at the mountain and compare them. The outline is the same. [link to bp1.blogger.com] The one from the right side [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp1.blogger.com] |
ehecatl
User ID: 21669867 Mexico 08/12/2012 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey thanks OP, I have not spent too much time with the subject of 'moon landing hoax' but that was the best list of evidence I've seen so far and it some of it seems pretty conclusive. A few points seemed not clear or I did not understand but other issues seem very conclusive. I was a child when that stuff was going on but I watched it on TV. That reminds me of a video I watched months ago, which was compelling in a subjective way, so it got filed as a foot note in my memory. I can't find the link but it was YT of a guy attempting to do live interviews with the astronauts, and asking them to swear that the moon landings were not faked, and filming their reactions. Do you remember which video that was? |
nzreva
(OP) User ID: 19624091 United States 08/12/2012 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is scam. Quoting: FubarMan People who under stand facts and science understand that Americans landed on the moon. In 1958 Skunk Works designed a plane that flew faster than a 30-06 bullet for extended periods. The engines were an odd hybrid of a turbo jet and pulse jet with a retracting nose cone to stifle the effects of shock-waves. A decade previous they were dropping nuclear weapons on cities. They had the technology and they went. Interesting why we are not using the space suits to clean up radiation. It would have saved many lives. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11696035 Canada 08/12/2012 12:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As we again study the surface on the moon we find our previous landing sites. Quoting: FubarMan [link to www.youtube.com] We have satellites capable of seeing scratches on a penny on earth from orbit. We spend billions in stupid shit every year. We can't send one of those satellites to the moon. suuuuuuuuuuuuuure |
Mindlouka
User ID: 21794158 Portugal 08/12/2012 12:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read that they did both, went to the moon and did the Hollywood stuff. That when on the moon they saw too many things, go ask John Lear again. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21796018 All in all the sad fact is that no-one believes what our govt and media says anymore about anything. Having Obama nor Romney in is going to make things more honorable for any of us, all they want to do is play war; thing is they are playing with real lives and the people are not being told the truths on that either. Some of you may be into theatrics but many of us despise that as we have taken our lives seriously and expected a higher level of that with those we trusted at one point. This is my belief too! They wanted to win "the race to space" from URSS and, since the russians were more advance than the americans at the time, they had to fake it. And fast. |
nzreva
(OP) User ID: 19624091 United States 08/12/2012 12:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey thanks OP, I have not spent too much time with the subject of 'moon landing hoax' but that was the best list of evidence I've seen so far and it some of it seems pretty conclusive. A few points seemed not clear or I did not understand but other issues seem very conclusive. I was a child when that stuff was going on but I watched it on TV. Quoting: ehecatl That reminds me of a video I watched months ago, which was compelling in a subjective way, so it got filed as a foot note in my memory. I can't find the link but it was YT of a guy attempting to do live interviews with the astronauts, and asking them to swear that the moon landings were not faked, and filming their reactions. Do you remember which video that was? Sorry, I don't. I have alot more to say about this in the next few days, I will be posting. |
nzreva
(OP) User ID: 19624091 United States 08/12/2012 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As we again study the surface on the moon we find our previous landing sites. Quoting: FubarMan [link to www.youtube.com] We have satellites capable of seeing scratches on a penny on earth from orbit. We spend billions in stupid shit every year. We can't send one of those satellites to the moon. suuuuuuuuuuuuuure If the film was a Hollywood creation how would this be evidence? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19858256 United States 08/12/2012 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nzreva
(OP) User ID: 19624091 United States 08/12/2012 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What about these photos? Look at the mountain and compare them. The outline is the same. Quoting: Mindlouka [link to bp1.blogger.com] The one from the right side [link to bp3.blogger.com] [link to bp1.blogger.com] Interesting. Good photos. Good cameramen can do a lot. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5449673 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 12:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We sent the moon rocks all over the world for study, even to our enemies. Why did they not say the rocks were fakes? MMMMMmmmm? LOL because they were and still are hard evidence. 'Moon rock' given to Holland by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin is fake A moon rock given to the Dutch prime minister by Apollo 11 astronauts in 1969 has turned out to be a fake. [link to www.telegraph.co.uk] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5562120 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 12:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so fubarman explain how this rover got where it is in the picture without leaving any tracks?? [link to bp0.blogger.com] bp0.blogger.com/_7Bqr1I5gzyk/R519Frk7fOI/AAAAAAAAAPM/AcFZK9C3iWc/s1600-h/moon%2520stuff001.jpg can you??! The rover only weighed 441 lbs. On the moon it weighed 73 lbs. That isn't going to leave a deep depression. And show a photo of where the tracks should have been instead of cropping them out of the picture. so how is there other photos by nasa of tracks on the mooon left by the rover, you guys are really dumb, so fucking dumb im outta here. |
nzreva
(OP) User ID: 19624091 United States 08/12/2012 12:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | so fubarman explain how this rover got where it is in the picture without leaving any tracks?? [link to bp0.blogger.com] bp0.blogger.com/_7Bqr1I5gzyk/R519Frk7fOI/AAAAAAAAAPM/AcFZK9C3iWc/s1600-h/moon%2520stuff001.jpg can you??! The rover only weighed 441 lbs. On the moon it weighed 73 lbs. That isn't going to leave a deep depression. And show a photo of where the tracks should have been instead of cropping them out of the picture. Their is a foot print on the moon it is not a heavy. Hmmm |
User ID: 3198332
User ID: 20867202 United Kingdom 08/12/2012 12:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | easy hoodwink the commodities if they are continualy dumbstruck with the moon landing deal. a singular episode in explasmam. they'll fool you ervery day the week. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21787522 Last Edited by User ID: 3198332 on 08/12/2012 12:16 PM |