Genetically engineering 'ethical' babies is a moral obligation, | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13778508 Canada 08/16/2012 11:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1193674 United States 08/16/2012 11:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If we have the ability to engineer ethical behavior, it's a good thing and should be done. yes, they won't be like you are, since a lot of people here are A-holes, but that doesn't mean it's wrong to seek the best in people. I'm just not certain those traits are completely genetic. A good education is just as important and proper upbringing, but we do nothing to really ensure those, do we? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 22085111 United States 08/17/2012 12:15 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1193674 United States 08/17/2012 12:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Many of the people who have done the most to advance society have been anti social freaks. Quoting: zenobiaphobia When we breed out the far edges of the bell curve, we prehaps will have nothing but stasis. Being ethical does not mean a person will be refined to the level you seem to think. Ethics are a specific thing after all. Also, what great things have been done by unethical people that we've actually needed? Please site some examples. Several would be good and explain why you think that their anti-social behavior had a significant affect on what they did. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 10783814 United States 08/17/2012 12:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1593102 United States 08/17/2012 12:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | in it's tracks. Man evolves through the exercise of free-will, from learning from mistakes, from the tension created between good and evil both internally and externally. Today's "unethical" scoundrel could be tomorrow's saint, as they learn, grow. Without the freedom to choose one's course humanity will lose it's spiritual endowment. The idiot scientist doesn't seem to understand that there is no ethics without freedom of choice - man becomes an automaton without freedom of will. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16194965 United States 08/18/2012 12:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As they do not even have sound a basis to start from: [link to www.stuff.co.nz] "It turns out babies don't have a moral compass after all, New Zealand researchers have found. An Otago University study has quashed the findings of a landmark 2007 Yale study which found that infants could tell the good guys from the bad guys. The prestigious university's study became an international sensation as it was the first to suggest that babies could assess individuals on their behaviour towards others. The findings have become widely accepted since the study was published, and more than one hundred other research papers have referred to it, which is a signal of its success, Otago University postdoctoral fellow Dr Damian Scarf said." I see what you did there. :) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 11696035 Canada 08/18/2012 12:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14110447 United States 08/18/2012 08:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This would stop human evolution, spiritual evolution Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1593102 in it's tracks. Man evolves through the exercise of free-will, from learning from mistakes, from the tension created between good and evil both internally and externally. Today's "unethical" scoundrel could be tomorrow's saint, as they learn, grow. Without the freedom to choose one's course humanity will lose it's spiritual endowment. The idiot scientist doesn't seem to understand that there is no ethics without freedom of choice - man becomes an automaton without freedom of will. This is what the "illuminutties" cannot grasp. |