Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,423 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 260,418
Pageviews Today: 425,334Threads Today: 138Posts Today: 2,441
06:09 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Calling all Iconoclasts... Enter. The Truth of Our Origins.
Poster Handle Heretic_333
Post Content
"When you seek a path to any new truth, you must
expect to find it blocked by ‘expert opinion.’
Albert Guérard"

It was once said the Earth was flat. Then it was found to be round. how can you say science is invalid?

"4 pertinent
distinctions in appearance of these bipedal
hair covered creatures."

Way to turn it's into a religious thing...

Also, I count you saying "I" and Me" over fifty times. Way to be self deluded.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22623897


Science is invalid because it has a "guilty until proven innocent" aspect. It will be taught that the world is
no doubt flat, until someone can prove otherwise.

The world will be taught that the world is flat.
Flat being 100% truth, because nothing else can
take it's place.

Science labeling a fact "subject to change"
is damn near sacrilegious.
 Quoting: Heretic_333


All facts in science are subject to change. It is society's understanding and application of those facts that causes the problem. Blame education, normalisation and acculturation, not science.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22456367


Blame the normalcy bias, I understand, but understand
this... Things must be explained with concrete terrestrial
terms and evidence. Science has hamstrung itself.

Science (overtime) has painted itself into the
corner, saying things can only be true once
proven so
.

There are 2 constants in scientific progression...
Theories and Facts. Scientists risk all of their
well being into declaring something a fact.
The moment that fact is proven false or is changed...
That scientist loses his credibility, status, and
overall reputation.

So money making scientists nip that problem in the bud
and declare any opposing theories as IMPOSSIBLE.

EVEN THOUGH, it is IMPOSSIBLE for the fact to be
complete!

Making progression move at the slow arduous climb
many alternative researchers despise today.
I am not saying we should declare any idea as true
until proven false, I am saying FACTS are constantly
being updated, so why not label facts as "what we
know so far" rather than "this is all you need to know"

Do you see what I mean? It makes scientific progression
costly and time consuming.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP