Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,101 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,234,597
Pageviews Today: 1,685,558Threads Today: 431Posts Today: 7,105
01:28 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)

 
~
User ID: 8443185
United States
10/23/2012 02:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
[link to www.rawstory.com]
...Appearing on CBS the next morning, Ryan told host Norah O’Donnell that he couldn’t make sense out of the “horses and bayonets” line.

“To compare modern American battleships with bayonets, I just don’t understand that comparison,” the Wisconsin Republican said. “Look, we have to have a strong Navy to keep peace and prosperity.”

“If all these defense cuts go through, our Navy will be small than it was before World War I,” Ryan continued. “That’s not acceptable. And, yes, the ocean hasn’t shrunk.”

In an interview on ABC, Vice President Joe Biden explained to host George Stephanopoulos that the president had told “the truth, that one aircraft carrier is probably more powerful than the entire United States Navy was back then.”

“Our Navy is superior to every other navy in the world combined,” the vice president pointed out. “In one aircraft carrier, we have more air power than almost every nation in the world has in their air force.”

Biden said that he “felt a little badly” for Romney because he showed “it’s clear he is not ready to be the commander in chief of the United States military. He demonstrated a lack of sophistication about what is going on in the world.”

1rof1

No... but ships are bigger and faster. They have this thing called "radar" now that lets you see long distances with missiles and guns that can shoot from farther away!
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8443185
United States
10/23/2012 03:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19058378
United States
10/23/2012 03:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
Mitty is right, we need at least 100 more carriers in our navy. Likely another 5,000 planes in our air force as well. we need to be able to be everywhere in world at once to be spread freedom to 3rd world nations everywhere. we are last hope.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 8443185
United States
10/23/2012 03:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)

"I just don't understand that comparison."

putin

THE STUPID IT BURNS!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19058378
United States
10/23/2012 03:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4469103
United States
10/23/2012 03:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


You guys are taking it to literal.. It wasn't about the horses and bayonets it was about the capabilities. We have advanced technology that allows us to to more with less. I'm not saying I agree with having less, but just pointing out what my interpretation of that part of the debate was.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22089462
Netherlands
10/23/2012 03:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


Hmmmmmm not sure if serious or not :|.

Also what I heard was that he solely said less bayonets. Can you please back up the claim that that statement is incorrect?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19058378
United States
10/23/2012 03:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


Hmmmmmm not sure if serious or not :|.

Also what I heard was that he solely said less bayonets. Can you please back up the claim that that statement is incorrect?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22089462


Whats not to understand? Our 1916 military would destory current one. We would get overwhlemed by the numbers. it would be massacre.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23182389
United States
10/23/2012 03:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
[link to www.breitbart.com]

Obama fail.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23182389
United States
10/23/2012 03:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


Umm... no.

[link to www.mittromney.com]


If you're talking about WW2, then yes.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8464481
United States
10/23/2012 03:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


Hmmmmmm not sure if serious or not :|.

Also what I heard was that he solely said less bayonets. Can you please back up the claim that that statement is incorrect?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22089462


Whats not to understand? Our 1916 military would destory current one. We would get overwhlemed by the numbers. it would be massacre.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


Yeah....ok....you know, those bayonets and misfiring piece of shit rifles would totally fuck us up!!!!! LIKE ZOMG!!!!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
RETARD ALERT!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4469103
United States
10/23/2012 03:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
Whats not to understand? Our 1916 military would destory current one. We would get overwhlemed by the numbers. it would be massacre.


Put down the crack pipe...that's not even close to being true.
HangZen
User ID: 1510250
United States
10/23/2012 03:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I'm confused.

Are we factoring in the Russian ships that the DNC used in their propaganda video?

Obama-tards all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8464481
United States
10/23/2012 03:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I'm confused.


 Quoting: HangZen 1510250


Yes you are.
Bless your soul.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19058378
United States
10/23/2012 03:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
Whats not to understand? Our 1916 military would destory current one. We would get overwhlemed by the numbers. it would be massacre.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4469103


Put down the crack pipe...that's not even close to being true.


Umm it true, Romney stated more ships = better navy. In 1916 we had many ship, now..not so many, just big ones but that mean they slow. Perhaps if we allowed coast gaurd to fight we could beat 1916 navy.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22089462
Netherlands
10/23/2012 03:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


Hmmmmmm not sure if serious or not :|.

Also what I heard was that he solely said less bayonets. Can you please back up the claim that that statement is incorrect?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22089462


Whats not to understand? Our 1916 military would destory current one. We would get overwhlemed by the numbers. it would be massacre.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

7 KM range and top speeds ranging at 20 knots.

A single fucking carrier can take out 50+ of them (by then I guess the planes run out of ammo) without even ever getting in their fire range....

A single destroyer can probably take out a dozen of them before running out of ammo (and also never getting in their fire range).
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8464481
United States
10/23/2012 03:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
Whats not to understand? Our 1916 military would destory current one. We would get overwhlemed by the numbers. it would be massacre.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4469103


Put down the crack pipe...that's not even close to being true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


Umm it true, Romney stated more ships = better navy. In 1916 we had many ship, now..not so many, just big ones but that mean they slow. Perhaps if we allowed coast gaurd to fight we could beat 1916 navy.


WIN!
This seriously had me LMF@ooooooo!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20676524
United States
10/23/2012 03:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
It's a bit sad how stupidfied the Zomneyfied are.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19058378
United States
10/23/2012 03:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


Hmmmmmm not sure if serious or not :|.

Also what I heard was that he solely said less bayonets. Can you please back up the claim that that statement is incorrect?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22089462


Whats not to understand? Our 1916 military would destory current one. We would get overwhlemed by the numbers. it would be massacre.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

7 KM range and top speeds ranging at 20 knots.

A single fucking carrier can take out 50+ of them (by then I guess the planes run out of ammo) without even ever getting in their fire range....

A single destroyer can probably take out a dozen of them before running out of ammo (and also never getting in their fire range).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22089462


Boy from Netherland tryin to educate me on military? Do you even have row boat in Nerthland?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24824113
United States
10/23/2012 03:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
Let me explain it for you, Mr. Ryan.

President Obama had nothing of real substance to say, so he was being petulant. I have a 4 year old who acts like this also. It's hard for us adults to understand, I know. The best thing to do would be to take his golf clubs and stand him in the corner.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24824113
United States
10/23/2012 03:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


Hmmmmmm not sure if serious or not :|.

Also what I heard was that he solely said less bayonets. Can you please back up the claim that that statement is incorrect?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22089462


Whats not to understand? Our 1916 military would destory current one. We would get overwhlemed by the numbers. it would be massacre.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


[link to en.wikipedia.org]

7 KM range and top speeds ranging at 20 knots.

A single fucking carrier can take out 50+ of them (by then I guess the planes run out of ammo) without even ever getting in their fire range....

A single destroyer can probably take out a dozen of them before running out of ammo (and also never getting in their fire range).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22089462

Good. Give me 15,000 of each.

Next!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 808852
United States
10/23/2012 03:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
Let me explain it for you, Mr. Ryan.

President Obama had nothing of real substance to say, so he was being petulant. I have a 4 year old who acts like this also. It's hard for us adults to understand, I know. The best thing to do would be to take his golf clubs and stand him in the corner.
 Quoting: LunaticFringe



^^^^ THIS! ^^^^^

So true!


cheers
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25681237
United States
10/23/2012 04:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
People PULEASE let this die. OB1 (Obama) is trying to tell you that the NAVAL SPACE COMMAND is all that you are going to need. And he's going to prove it to YOU SOON!! Bring in the logic probe.


end of line.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13158115
United States
10/23/2012 04:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I'm confused.

Are we factoring in the Russian ships that the DNC used in their propaganda video?

Obama-tards all.
 Quoting: HangZen 1510250


dems should just STFU about the mil
ANNONYMOUS
User ID: 8415236
United States
10/23/2012 04:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


Hmmmmmm not sure if serious or not :|.

Also what I heard was that he solely said less bayonets. Can you please back up the claim that that statement is incorrect?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22089462


Whats not to understand? Our 1916 military would destory current one. We would get overwhlemed by the numbers. it would be massacre.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


5a

Wow, you must have cornered the market on STUPIDITY! One carrier strike force would be able to destroy the entire 1916 Navy period! Sorry, no prize for you MORON!
071676

User ID: 19545845
United States
10/23/2012 04:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


You guys are taking it to literal.. It wasn't about the horses and bayonets it was about the capabilities. We have advanced technology that allows us to to more with less. I'm not saying I agree with having less, but just pointing out what my interpretation of that part of the debate was.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4469103


Yeah, just pop off one little EMP bomb and all of our glorious technology is worthless.
chrion777

User ID: 8258047
United States
10/23/2012 04:53 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


So what about what Obama said, that technology has evolved and that we have air craft carriers that carry an entire fleat and submarines so we don't need as many battleships.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24824113
United States
10/23/2012 04:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


You guys are taking it to literal.. It wasn't about the horses and bayonets it was about the capabilities. We have advanced technology that allows us to to more with less. I'm not saying I agree with having less, but just pointing out what my interpretation of that part of the debate was.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4469103


Yeah, just pop off one little EMP bomb and all of our glorious technology is worthless.
 Quoting: 071676


The funny thing is that the horses and bayonets (and the weapons they are attached to) will still work.


Go figure.
Nam Marine
User ID: 24695931
United States
10/23/2012 04:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
It "means", Obama is the Moron you thought he was !ohappy
071676

User ID: 19545845
United States
10/23/2012 05:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
I dont understand it either. Obamy doesnt realize that bayonet still widely used in military. Bottom line is our 1916 navy would defeat our current navy because they have more ship..it that simple, we would be outnumbered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19058378


You guys are taking it to literal.. It wasn't about the horses and bayonets it was about the capabilities. We have advanced technology that allows us to to more with less. I'm not saying I agree with having less, but just pointing out what my interpretation of that part of the debate was.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4469103


Yeah, just pop off one little EMP bomb and all of our glorious technology is worthless.
 Quoting: 071676


The funny thing is that the horses and bayonets (and the weapons they are attached) to will still work.


Go figure.
 Quoting: LunaticFringe


That was my point. Get rid of all of the technology and what you have left is "Horses and Bayonets".
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 815606
Canada
10/23/2012 05:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Paul Ryan: ‘I just don’t understand’ what ‘horses and bayonets’ means (video)
You guys are taking it to literal.. It wasn't about the horses and bayonets it was about the capabilities. We have advanced technology that allows us to to more with less. I'm not saying I agree with having less, but just pointing out what my interpretation of that part of the debate was.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4469103


No Barry was being a smart ass but a stupid one that that because 300,000 marines would disagree about the bayonets and special forces in Afghanistan would disagree about the horses. I might add that Border Patrol uses horses too.





GLP