NEIL ARMSTRONG LIED!...regarding WHEN he coined his first man on the moon remarks

...And what else did Neil and the other Apollo astronauts lie about? And for what purpose?

Another article about it...

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]

To sum up, Neil Armstrong claimed that he thought up his first-man-on-the-moon remarks spontaneously while on the moon.

It turns out, he had prepared those remarks months in advance of the Apollo 11 mission, according to his brother, Dean, in an interview with the BBC.

Why did Neil Armstrong lie?

As in a court of law, when you can prove someone has knowingly lied once, it puts in doubt all else they've said. Just ask Mark Fuhrman.

If he said he prepared the remarks months in advance, then how does that stack in the process compared with saying he thought about it spontaneously while on the moon?

It is not really an outright lie, but more of something on the order of "poetic license." For that matter he could have written several different things to say and selected the one we know historically while he was on the moon.

The real problem is the flimsy gold scotch gift wrapping tape on the alleged moon lander and other things.

You know America never went to the moon, right?

I already know what i'm going to say when i step foot on mars.

Now i'm a liar.

Maybe Stanley Kubrick knows if we went to the moon or not

Only thing is these days he's not saying a whole heck of a lot

You're only a liar if you DO eventually go to Mars as the first man to set foot there, and then, after the fact, claim you thought up your remarks spontaneously while on the surface of the Red Planet.

He "said" quite a bit in "The Shining". See "Kubrick's Odyssey".

;)

Oh, there's so much more than that. :)

I was being facetious

Great Documentary though

This Just In: People Lie

My mistake. I didn't pick up on that. :) Ya, I liked it, too. I didn't realize that what I'd posted was just a trailer for it. I guess you can't view it on YouTube. Not sure. But it's for sale at sacred-mysteries.com.

What's interesting is that there are several parts of "The Shining" where movie director Stanley Kubrick deviates from the book written by Stephen King. And there's no good, rational, apparent reason for doing so, except...(Jay Weidner explains why in "Kubrick's Odyssey"). Very compelling. Two examples of this that immediately come to mind are: 1) the room number that people are NOT supposed to EVER go in. Kubrick changed the room number from the room's number in King's book. The number of the room in the movie coincides with the distance in miles from the earth to the moon. 2) the twins who the little boy keeps seeing. In King's book, there was just ONE kid. In the movie, Kubrick had TWINS, aka "Gemini" -- the pre-Apollo mission that orbited the moon, prior to the Apollo missions. This is just a taste of what's included in the rest of the documentary. You won't be disappointed.

Where's fucking Astroshill and his almost homoerotic love and defense of Neil Armstrong? I demand to know!

WHY did Neil Armstrong lie about when he thought up his first-man-on-the-moon remarks?

"Ground control to HALCYON DAYZ. Come in HALCYON DAYZ..."

If you reside in the UK you can watch the documentary here: [link to www.bbc.co.uk]


Present!


So people would stop bugging him?


Are you for real?

Is there any human on the planet capable of communication who has never lied?
Do you even understand the difference between a white lie and perjury?
If everybody who ever got caught in a lie couldn't testify they might as well remove the witness-chair from the courtrooms.

Anyhoo, are you under some sort of delusion that the historicity of Apollo depends on the words of a handful of men?


Oh yes!
Let's have us some fun.

Give it your best.



LOL.

It's called Aluminized Kapton, and the only problem here is you not knowing what it is for.



Aren't documentaries supposed to document reality rather than the musings of the maker.



Everybody but OP, that is.
OP never even lied to his mum about who took the cookies from the jar.

Darryl Cunningham Investigates The Moon Hoax [link to darryl-cunningham.blogspot.com]
Moon Base Clavius, for all your debunking needs [link to www.xmission.com]

Without "musings" as you call them, where would we be? If Galileo hadn't mused? If Da Vinci hadn't mused? Isn't a question the first step in a scientific process? We haven't reached the age of the robot...yet.

As far as lying, why would Neil Armstrong tell a world-wide audience via a media interview, that he came up with one of the most famous sayings in the history of mankind while he was on the moon, rather than, as his brother Dean revealed, on earth, months earlier? Why wouldn't he have simply told the truth? Why distort reality? Wouldn't he want an accurate record of what really happened for posterity? And if he lied about that, what else did he lie about?

But you're a mind reader, and via telepathy, Neil Armstrong revealed to you that he lied so "people would stop bugging me". Hmmmm...let's consider that for a moment. How would saying that stop people from bugging him? Derailment on the logic train.

As I said before, the O.J. Simpson case was lost because Detective Mark Fuhrman told one lie: that he'd never used the "n" word before. When it was proved he had, his entire testimony was compromised. We are discussing the honesty of NASA (that includes the astronauts, obviously) with regard to their account of the alleged Apollo moon missions. When the commander of the first mission to land on the moon and the first man to walk on the moon lies about the circumstances upon which one of the most famous quotes uttered by man was constructed and for which he will be forever known, it bears further scrutiny.

The "Moon Race" -- Who ever heard of a race where the loser never crosses the finish line?

It's exactly this kind of crap that allows TPTB to freely discard everything that we say. Thanks for being part of the problem.

joe rogan says that that cunt neil armweak was a lying drunk

[link to www.youtube.com]

To the self-loving and ignorant people:
[link to www.youtube.com]

Care to elaborate? Be specific.

I first met Neil in 1977 and we stayed casual friends until he died. The last contact I had with him was an unanswered Email I sent him while he was in the hospital after his heart operation. One of the first questions I asked Neil in 1977 was, "How many other things had he thought of to say when he first set foot on the moon?" and his exact words were, "That's it. There were no others." You can speculate that this meant he only thought of it when he landed on the moon but knowing Neil as the most thoughtful and precise engineer EVER, he would not have approached this question of what to say on the spur of the moment, but would have prepared it months in advance.

And if you knew him, you would know that he didn't lie. If there was a discrepancy between what he said on two different occasions, it was, to him, a meaningless thing.

He was, in reality, just what he appeared to be...an extraordinary man of great courage and humility and worthy of the respect he received from the world.

He did, indeed, seem like a humble, decent man, and in my opinion, his alleged Apollo mission was not the height of his many accomplishments.

exactly where is that fucktard? Hes just a fucking shill after all