There is a complete lack of evidence that any mass evacuation took place at Sandy Hook with just 3 photo's from one journalist showing only a few dozen children. These can be seen here:
[
link to lightbox.time.com]
In addition to the non-existent evacuation of 600 kids there is the strange anomaly that the few kids that were evacuated seemed to have all come out the front doors, this is shown by the photo's and there is a police transcript (which I can't find atm) saying there is a big bunch of kids being evacuated out the front doors.
BUT, the front doors is where Adam Lanza is reported to have shot his way in, it is also the area that he shot the principal and psychologist...
SO WHY WOULD YOU EVACUATE CHILDREN OUT THROUGH THE FRONT DOORS?There is blood, bullet casings, bodies, glass.... and the area is a crime scene and it should be preserved as good as possible, so why didn't they evacuate kids out the side doors?
Going through a different exit the kids would not have to avoid blood, glass and bullet casings, nor would they be traumatised by seeing dead bodies. It's not like this was a fire where the kids had to be evacuated through the most direct route.
All evacuation procedures have multiple exit points just in case one or more are blocked by fire etc, so why did they take the kids through an exit point they should have been avoiding for multiple reasons?
ANSWER: There was no shooting, no blood, no bodies, no bullets, no crime scene, so they just took the few child actors out the front door. Otherwise there is no way the kids would have been evacuated out the front doors, they would have been taken out the side exits.