May 15th ME TEL U NOW SHIN THIS PHIT OMGWTFBBQ

Source? Link?

Quick google search:

[link to www.nytimes.com]

I haven't followed this thread long enough to watch May 15 come & go over the years so Idk the types of stress this post will play on the mind for long term readers. However, none of the predictions actually came to pass from 2003-2010. Everything that has happened in relevance with the pope, george bush, mandela, thatcher, dolphins, ALL JUST IN THE FIRST 3 MONTHS OF THIS YEAR. I like how the entity refers to other dimensional beings sometimes being able to see us coming into their timeline before we get there, this is sort of similar to how humans claim to see ghosts, which aren't material objects, however maintain a human appearance. This is exactly what the entity describes, multi dimensional merging. Apparently some beings have adapted traits necessary to see time, or that's the best explanation I can give with my ability to think.

He refers to time being a line that goes in a circle, meaning constant repetition played over layers and layers of past time lines, (would these be active, neutral, how would you classify a time line that has come to pass, compared to a timeline that hasn't formed yet)If a being is able to see a timeline coming, would that mean that all timelines already exist, and time is only perception based off a beings adaptations? One line going in a circle. Linear, while circular, this is a concept alot of people don't get the importance of. Now i've worked myself into a clusterfuck.

Suppose we view the essence of "time" as a spring, which is what a single line repeatedly going in a circle will inevitably create. Time could then be compressed, if the right force is applied, what effect would this have on beings in the timeline, would it slow or speed up their perception of time? It could be compressed to a point where there were a million layers of time within a centimeter of space. This is the illusion of infinity. While at the same time it could be decompressed to a point where there were HUGE *SPACES* between time lines. This is the infinity of illusion. It means nothing & everything at the same time.

Ironic that I'm posting this...

I think acolyte's info' pointed to the information not being tied to a particular year, or that the year they originally tied it to may have been incorrectly arrived at due to the Mayan calendar innacuracies. (inaccuracies bases on 2012, when the new Chinese translations point to 2016)

In any regard, waiting and looking for these pointers that will then show the way to the year in question is what I think most long term readers of the MeTellU thread, and this thread are waiting on.

As for the interpretation of the circle you mention above - if you look at a 'slinky' (spiral) from above, you see a circle, when inactual fact you have a very long line, that could go on forever.

That also shows us that our perspectives are ruling how we determine many 'facts' or at least settle on an answer. The entity was very much suggesting that we need to change these perspectives in order to se the greater universe which has always been there - just not seen, or measured, because of our blinkered thinking.

Well, that's my perspective anyway...

Illusion of infinity, infinity of illusion, to me he is saying time has a point where it begins, ends, but continues on somehow, almost as if it layers on top of one another, viewing time like a slinky, in order for timelines to merge with one another they would have to be separate in some way wouldn't they? Unless you were to take the spring and bend it in half, (no different than the black hole paper fold example) but why would the slinky bend.. Goddamn this thread.

And believing in ghosts, throws alot of interesting perspectives into the realm about people claiming to have seen ghosts. Maybe time is a contant linear in multiple dimensions, and the timelines don't interact, but the dimensions do. Straying too far off topic and giving myself a headache, always good to get a refreshing reply from BHD, like the only one actively following this anymore lol.

Always good to chat with you Aliensbro. How come you dont show up as the OP?


----------

In relation to cross overs, if you look at a dna strand, its the cross overs, or the ladder rungs that make up the component.

Maybe in relation to the slinky analagy, what we percieve as time is actually the joining of two points on the spiral, just like the dna rungs. You need an A and a B.

Wierd cross overs might be long stretched out rungs, or where two spirals are touching?

I think with this topic, as with bezerk, you can really be 'out of bounds' or off topic! That's what makes them so damn interesting. Like the tractor beam on the death star....

I like the cross over analogy. Double helix is just 2 lines with crossovers. Maybe your onto something there. I don't show up as op anymore because for whatever reason I can't log in to my account anymore, so I monitor silently. But I read everything you guys post.

This and bezerk just throw my down a line of thought that always ends with a brick wall, i'm sure you know the feeling.

Well, I'm sure it is designed that way. Little bread crumbs here and there and a lot of speculation. Easy to go down the wrong path, but dang, its always an interesting one! I think that's what frustrated the original OP so much. It's kind a turned into something new/diferent/more.

I wasn't a GLPer when this surfaced and all of the accusations that acolyte hoaxed the thread were around, but i've seen a post where someone says that he hoaxed it, and acolyte actually replied right beneath him with "everyone already knows that". I wish I had saved the thread. Either way I follow this thread for the theories that come out of it. Fuck sudoku, exercise your mind with me tel u. Lol. I just wish I had a more clear and concrete view on whether OP legitly delivered it or hoaxed it. Suppose it doesn't really matter.. Shit you can't prove may as well be fiction anyway.

Did you read the Nexus magazine article on bezerk? It will give you an insight to how and why these things are written, and what acolyte's function is.

He's an easy target, and has copped a lot of abuse, but his threads are all up there in the top 20 threads ever on glp.

I think the Nexus article is available on line through the magazine's web page.

BTW, I agree with your statement about the information on the threads bending your mind a bit. Whether they were operations to mind fuck us, or, genuine slow release information packages, for public/civilian think tanks to work out what was going on, has almost become irrelevant.

Hey did you see this thread btw? If true, also gives some insight in to how things work. (maybe) Or just more mind fucks!! LOL..

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

We also found evidence during the peak of bezerk that US Navy Intelligence was playing around with bots etc. We found a tender document for a (50)+ persona programmable suite of bots, equipped to scan daily news, link it to their virtual country of origin etc. Freakey.

But you pick up a lot from the writing styles and the online persona and reactions. I always had the feeling that there were a buch of PCs somewhere, in a few rooms, with cubicles, and thick folders, detailing how one should act and react when playing a particular role on this or that site, one this or that thread. You could feel the different people attempting to play the same role.

Got my profile wrong. I'm a fence sitter apparently, who cant make tough decisions, and wont be a stayer.




EDIT - TX for picking up my spelling errors, and taking the time to let me know May I go to recess now?

Is this the Tassy connection?

The thread you linked to has been deleted... surprise, surprise... fancy giving us a quick synopsis?

Hmm. clean up? I value my ability to log on! sorry.

**hoovered**

Oh that one... I did know about it... The fact its gone says more than if it hadn't.

Bad Hair Day... Just a little correction - it should be spelled insight not incite - To incite is to arouse - usually incite a riot. Insight is an inner knowing ... You used the incorrect spelling twice so it wasn't a typo - sorry but as an ex teacher couldn't help myself...

Haha! thank you for the correction. I'm usually the one who cringes at such things, including capitalisation.

All good now.

Mind you... sometimes I do miss spell words or capitalise others to get a second point across!

On last night's c2c show Linda Moulten Howe spoke about the CHANI story.

Also - there is a chani forum for people wanting to know more.

On that note... 'till next time AliensBro

I've read the background n all that about the rubicon revealers and how acolyte came to be in possession of said documents, and if I remember correctly, why he started smoking? Lol. And your right it has become near irrelevant with all that this & bezerk have brought us. In my mind there's no doubt this is the year, if me tel u now has any merit it will be on the timeline from 2012-2016. Frankly I don't see many of the politicians on the list still being alive after that point for sure, mandela bout to croak anyday lol.

If someone wants to 'legitly deliver' something they don't role play as a grammatically-challenged incoherent 'entity' and then later admit that they 'messed up' when getting caught in the act. I have a problem with people being intentionally deceptive. I think you will find if a person had credible information and wanted to disseminate it to others, that person will do so in a straightforward and no bullshit manner. Not dress it up as some poorly disguised role playing 'entity' posting on a conspiracy forum just to garner increased attention. The whole thing stinks if you ask me.... There's lots of distractions posted on these types of sites and I believe many of them are intentional, other ones are just from attention-seekers.

That is a nice, but very unrealistic expectation to have. How is it working out for you? You must be disappointed in every single person on the planet on a daily basis.

Look at it any way you want, but the whole saga is consistent within its claimed context - ie a deniable reveal project from a group within the RAND think tank.

Maybe take a look at the message instead of the messenger, and see how it resonates with you.

Those of us still following all this do so, because we feel an interest or a resonance with what was said.

I contend that YOU also feel a resonance to it, but that it is challenging your current beliefs about things. Why else would you even bother to come here and naysay?

G'day Bloke.

I can't believe you dipshits are still buying into this thread when the OP came forth laughing calling you all idiots in admittance of hoaxing you..

Sure he did.