Moon totally on it's side right now

The most annoyingest poster on GLP. Sheesh.

But to each his own. All i'm saying is that a picture is not proof of anything, whether the argument was for me or against me. You can believe it illustrates proof, but you cannot prove it unedited. So I see no reason why anyone would wish to use these unreliable sources as a basis for factual information.

Lol forget this thread Thread: Lets FLOOD FB & TWITTER WITH THE SANDY HOOK HOAX VID ALL DAY do something that matters

Last Edited by aliensbro on 01/18/2013 03:24 PM

The fact that it's old IS THE POINT!

Oh, I see, you think the rocket was only on the pad for launch day. Man you're stupid.

Astro can you prove it wasn't? Why are you so quick to call people stupid? How the fuck do you know how long that rocket was there? You can not have this knowledge.. You were not there. You would be reading someone else's opinion if you claimed to have gained this knowledge. You are so far beyond naive it's ridiculous

Make that 2 idiots who think the rocket was only on the pad for launch day. Good god you people really don't know anything about NASA at all, yet you think you're in a position to judge whether they're credible as a source or not.

...1 person in 5 days your support is dwindling

I've no clue how long they were there, the only difference is that I have the knowledge to realize that I DONT KNOW. You keep citing information you couldn't possibly prove and then front it as if you read it from nasas asshole

ASTRO WAS PRESENT WHEN APOLLO LAUNCHED TO CATALOG THAT THERE WAS INDEED A MOON VISIBLE IN THE ABOVE PHOTO, AND THAT IT WAS INDEED A CHESCHIRE MOON. THIS CAN NOT BE DISPROVEN, SO DO NOT TRY.

[link to www.stellarium.org]

Set it to the location and the date and look at the Moon.

nope, no such moon there. [link to www.hq.nasa.gov]

That famous 10 x 8 B/W Glossy NASA Photograph
NASA No. 108-KSC-71P-74
appeared just as postcard, for the market, obviously.
An outstanding night view of the mighty Apollo 14 Saturn V (Spacecraft 110/Lunar Module 8/Saturn 509) with a crescent Moon almost directly overhead.

Is it any wonder how some are still so obsessed with these few words: mighty Apollo Moon?

40+ years later!

Mighty meaning it resembles aluminum foil, and even there it says that it is a crescent moon and not a cheschire.

Holy fucking shit dude, learn how to do even a small bit of research. If you don't know how long it took the crawler to deliver the Saturn V to the launch pad or how long they did that in advance of a launch, learn how to look it up.

LMFAO! You are such an idiot! Someone else's opinion my ass. Learn what a fact is, dumbass. I grew up by the launchpads, I watched rockets and shuttles come and go. They don't drive those things up there day of launch (Falcon 9 will be a rare exception eventually, but even now it is still tested on the pad days before launch). It's not a matter of "opinion," idiot, thousands of people lived in the communities around the launch pads, they SAW THE ROCKET ON THE PAD LONG BEFORE LAUNCH! Apollo 14 rollout occurred on November 9th, 1970:
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]
Oh right, you don't believe anything NASA says no matter what, even if thousands of people all around the area fucking saw it. Fine, learn how to do some fucking research and check the newspaper archives yourself if you don't believe me:
[link to news.google.com]
Top left corner of the page, Nov. 9, 1970.
Boom.

No wonder you're such an idiot, you think I'm "naive." You're an irreversable example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

You people are so fucking stupid! Rollout for Apollo 14 occurred in NOVEMBER 1970! MONTHS BEFORE LAUNCH! IT EVEN MENTIONS THAT FACT ON YOUR OWN FUCKING LINK!
"Al Shepard leads his crew across the swing arm after inspecting the Command Module during rollout. 9 November 1970. Scan by J.L. Pickering."
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]

You asked for one, now eat my taint as promised.

LEARN HOW TO DO SOME FUCKING RESEARCH YOU IDIOT!
[link to news.google.com]
November 9th, 1970! And no, you don't realize that you don't know, or you wouldn't have latched onto the ASSumption that it was only on the pad for launch day and therefore there couldn't possibly be a picture showing the moon next to it like that. You clearly did not realize just how little you know or you wouldn't have latched onto ASSumption like that.

Last Edited by Astromut on 01/18/2013 04:00 PM

Are we even having the same argument? cause your like really excited for having made no advancement in your argument whatsoever. No one ever claimed it was brought in the day of, you claimed it wasn't. Now prove it. Or shut the fuck up. Isn't that how your logic was earlier? Prove it wrong or i'm right? You keep tooting your own horn after you make a post like the post had anything in it relevant to your argument. You already got hung up to dry astro just stop. Your starting to make yourself look stupid

Show me where I stated it was on the launch pad for one day, you can't because I didn't say that. I said prove it wasn't there for one day, can you? No. K your arguments as valid as mine. Do you see how ignorant you are astro? It's like talkin to a fuckin christian, almost worse, if that's possible.

Not so.

1/18/2013 Hey Astro, nice work in education the retards, not that they'll pay any attention to facts and figures. -Defj@m
1/17/2013 Putting tards in their place again and again
1/16/2013 A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. - boxer
1/15/2013 You'll go hoarse trying to educate the unintelligent. They are beyond hope. ~ Fatalw1shes

DON'T CALL OTHERS STUPID, MORON!

is this the photo you waving here
KSC-70PC-649 ( 168k )
Al Shepard leads his crew across the swing arm after inspecting the Command Module during rollout. 9 November 1970. Scan by J.L. Pickering.
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]
or this
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]
perhaps this one
[link to www.hq.nasa.gov]

And now based on the fact you can't actually gain support here, you start providing evidence of times when you have had support.. What's your angle? You got no support for anything you said in this thread except from Geo, and all he said was that he finds nasa images credible. I don't know how any sane man can make that statement but to each his own.

I didn't say what you said, I said you latched onto the assumption, and you did.

Yes, I did.
[link to news.google.com]
Ellensburg Daily Record, Mon., Nov. 9, 1970. Thousands of people from all around, including my hometown, saw it. You're calling regular people, not just NASA, liars with no reason to lie. You're fucking insane.

Those are all from the last few days.

The facts and evidence I posted support what I said, and the people leaving me karma are probably doing it because of this thread, so thank you.

What is the difference between claiming something and "latching onto the assumption?" What is this a fucking obama interview lmfao. It's called posing a hypothetical to show you the ignorance of your ways, which you are still blind to see. No i'm aware. Believing people without proof is fucking insane, and that's apparently all your into. Stupidity is expecting someone to have your best interests at mind. What did they see astro? The fucking shuttle on the pad? No shit. NOW PROVE IT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE? PROVE THOSE PEOPLE WERE THERE. Your arguments are no more valid than any other without proof, even though you claim to have seen it in your hometown. It would be ignorant to accept any of the things you have said here because you have not provided one shred of PROOF "NOT EVIDENCE LIKABLE TO YOUR POSITION" UNDENIABLE INTANGIBLE PROOF. You can't and won't even attempt it.

The only reason I disagree with that is because I haven't gotten any red, so people clearly aren't takin sides. Probably just popped in to read the pointless argument that accomplished nothing for either party.

You are so stupid it hurts, I have a headache now because of your stupidity. The image list was your link dumbass, and more than one photo's description explicitly tells you when rollout happened... months before launch! Newspaper archives confirm it as well. Anyone who lives near the pads knows that they don't roll rockets out the day before launch, they can be seen on the pads for days and weeks before launch, sometimes even longer. That is standard operating procedure, so for you to assume it was only on the pad starting at the dates they attempted a launch shows your extreme ignorance of spaceflight and NASA.