Webcam Abortions, Big Money at Stake and Lives at Risk | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 17845378 United States 02/18/2013 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You can be busy destroying unborn babies six days a week because, heck, in the unlikely case you don’t have enough “patients” locally, you can reach out all over the state. Those “underserved” rural areas [the ones with no home-grown abortionist or too far out of the way to have one fly in or whose “volume” is too low] can have abortion rates as high as a college town like Austin. What a deal! As they always do, proponents of webcam abortions want to describe abortions as just another “medical service” that ought to viewed—and distributed—no differently than any other. Thus the very last lines: “The bottom line: In the U.S., 10 million people in underserved areas see doctors via telemedicine.[Pro-Life] Activists want to restrict its use for abortion service.” So, to the abortion industry, webcam abortions are a subset of telemedicine and if you no objections to using telemedicine for legitimate medicine, you ought not to be bothered by having it employed to One other point in Deprez’s story, which is typical. Pro-lifers patiently point out that RU486 abortions not only kill unborn babies they are dangerous for women. According to an FDA document released in 2011, there have been at least 19 women who died after attempting to abort with RU-486, at least 2,200 suffering significant enough “adverse events” to be reported, and at least 612 women requiring Most proponents simply ignore this. They prefer to argue that the complications rate is essentially the same whether the abortionist “prescribed abortion drugs in person” or women “were given the treatment after a teleconference,” to quote Deprez. They go further to cite a study published in The American Journal of Public Health which looked at “Changes in Service Delivery Patterns After Introduction of Telemedicine Provision of Medical Abortion in Iowa.” For the moment ignore that the usual pro-abortionists were in charge of the study. The study concluded, “Recent legislation to ban telemedicine abortion may adversely affect public health by preventing women from accessing abortion earlier in pregnancy, when it is safer.” |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 17845378 United States 02/18/2013 01:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 17845378 United States 02/18/2013 01:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |