| Users Online Now: 2,405 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,411,561 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,356,796 | Threads Today: 939 | Posts Today: 16,770 |
| 10:01 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,405 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,411,561 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,356,796 | Threads Today: 939 | Posts Today: 16,770 |
| 10:01 PM | ||
DA14 Was Shot - Was NASA Caught Red Handed 02-17-2013 | |
Krispy71
(OP) User ID: 34333335  Netherlands02/19/2013 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | gee Krispy.....didn't expect you to run with this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34471515 but while we're on the subject.....did you read the comment after this article .... [link to en.rian.ru] ....written by Arnold Vinette and "Prometheus"?  Arnolds facebook picture.... [link to www.facebook.com (secure)] a little background music..... Lol AC Canada, yep I am in for some surprises ghehe ... Those are pretty ...uhmmm... serious postings of those 2 guys beneath that article ... whoop whoop  :whoop:Just wondered if The Elites could have tried to "influence" the travelling-path of Earth in the past years, and will do the same in the next to come (to make sure they'll avoid a collision with this future-doom-asteroid ... In my opinion EQ like those in Chile, Sumatra and Japan (probably more) of which was said to have influenced the spin of Earth ... If one changes the spin you change the spot where you would have been in the future, you'll end up just BEFORE [with a slow down] or AFTER [with a speed up] this X-mark .... NASA said : -Using a United States Geological Survey estimate for how the fault responsible for the earthquake slipped, research scientist Richard Gross of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., applied a complex model to perform a preliminary theoretical calculation of how the Japan earthquake—the fifth largest since 1900—affected Earth's rotation. His calculations indicate that by changing the distribution of Earth's mass, the Japanese earthquake should have caused Earth to rotate a bit faster, shortening the length of the day by about 1.8 microseconds (a microsecond is one millionth of a second). The calculations also show the Japan quake should have shifted the position of Earth's figure axis (the axis about which Earth's mass is balanced) by about 17 centimeters (6.5 inches), towards 133 degrees east longitude. Earth's figure axis should not be confused with its north-south axis; they are offset by about 10 meters (about 33 feet). This shift in Earth's figure axis will cause Earth to wobble a bit differently as it rotates *Note : 133 degrees ... 1-33 = masonic master number ;) and 33 feet ...lol... NASA: -On a larger scale, the unbuckling (of tectonic plates) and shifting moved the planet’s mass, on average, closer to its center, and just as a figure skater who spins faster when drawing the arms closer, the Earth’s rotation speeds up. Richard S. Gross, a scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, calculated that the length of the day was shortened by 1.8 millionths of a second. -"Earth's rotation changes all the time as a result of not only earthquakes, but also the much larger effects of changes in atmospheric winds and oceanic currents," I know this ((changes in atmospheric winds and oceanic currents)) ticks in with Bezerk ...lol... How different sound the words of that song now !!!! The Elites always have to drop clues .... Tnx again AC Canada  |
| Krispy71
(OP) User ID: 34333335 Netherlands02/28/2013 05:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Gravitational Tractor “How would you change the course of an Earth-threatening asteroid? One possibility - a massive spacecraft that uses gravity as a towline - is illustrated in this artist’s vision of a gravitational tractor in action. In the hypothetical scenario worked out in 2005 by Edward Lu and Stanley Love at NASA’s Johnson Space Center, a 20 ton nuclear-electric spacecraft tows a 200 meter diameter asteroid by simply hovering near the asteroid. The spacecraft’s ion drive thrusters are canted away from the surface. Their slight but steady thrust would gradually and predictably alter the course of the tug and asteroid, coupled by their mutual gravitational attraction. While it sounds like the stuff of science fiction, ion drives do power existing spacecraft. One advantage of using a gravitational tractor is that it would work regardless of the asteroid’s structure. Given sufficient warning and time, a gravitational tractor could deflect the path of an asteroid known to be on a collision course enough to miss planet Earth.” [link to apod.nasa.gov] |
| Krispy71
(OP) User ID: 34333335 Netherlands03/09/2013 05:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What you all think about this new vid ? I'll share here what I told my friend Gary Walton (at FB) who posted this vid above on my page : Beeeeee-youuuuu-teeeee-ful muze-ik !!!!! .... BUT .... the more fragments I watched, the more I got convinced that "something" MADE it explode at a certain hight after which only a small fragment of the original monster was able to slam into impact !!!!! .... WHAT gave the BIG BLAST ??? ... Why blasted it THERE to proceed in a small fragment ? ... I wonder if it is normal to go that way always ? Quoting: Krispy at FBI know that the meteorite before it enters the [dampkring] is bigger, and it reduces size by burning up partially. I would expect a REACTION like an explosion if it would reach a different very cold/or very hot layer in the lower atmosphere, but ....the more it descends to earth the warmer the air gets ... THAT would not be a cauze for SUDDEN explosion ! ... So that leaves me riddled ... The only thing I would suspect is that TPTB/or ??? directed a special [NOT VISABLE TO THE NORMAL EYE] "beam" was directed to diminish this meteorite to a "not letal/not disastrous" size !!!! I WONDER WHAT IMAGES WOULD REVEAL WHEN VIEUWED IN SPECIAL SPECTRA !!!!! Could we define ultra-sound rays directed at it ... Get what I mean ??? xxx As a reply Gary posted 2 vids, one [the first] of which I started this thread with ... My reply: Yes Gary, I saw that vid of "Nasa caught ..." and yes I think it could be possible that THEY indeed tried to cut this meteorite into pieces in "outer space", but like the vid shows > that seemed to fail ... thus ... they needed plan B to diminish the REST of what left over after entering and break up in the upper atmosphere ... Imo THEY thought that it still was toooo big for letting it impact in the original size ... Quoting: Krispy at FBSeems to me that either TPTB were not ready [with their scenario's] orrrrrr that RUSSIA took control itself and blasted the bastard in pieces .... It is very very very likely that it would NOT have been an action of the USA to do that, coz with their biggest rival crippled in this impact, THEY the other rivaling worldpower-nation(s) would have had the opportunity and a window to TAKE OVER control !!!! So, the more I think about it, I think it were the Ruskies themselves who took action, in order NOT to be left crippled !!!! And WHO KNOWS : Maybe what we interpreted as a FAILED NASA MANOUVRE IN SPACE was in fact "A DELIBERATE SUCCESSFUL MANOUVRE" by those who wanted the trajectory of the meteorite to be DIVERTED to a DELIBERATE DESTINATION !!!!! What about that ??? Then gary posted : "Watch the second vid Krispy!" (here below) THE SECOND VID totally zooms in on the WRONG THING !!! The WHITE BALL it is pointing at first and later the triplets in the trees ARE JUST CHUNKS of the original meteorite, a chunk that broke loose just below it and the multiple after the big blast in the tree. NOT A UFO !!! Quoting: Krispy at FBBUT !!!! ---> In the first 3 snippets of video there IS something else that drew my interest !!! FIRST you see a BLACK ?projectile? PROCEEDS the bright light of the meteorite [COMING FROM THE LEFT..]!!! A SECOND PROJECTILE APPROACHES FROM THE RIGHT from in the upper part of the tree, and then MAKING A 180 degree TURN to the trunk of the tree !!!! I ASK YOU WHAT WAS "THAT" ... Those 2 PROJECTILES ?????  xxxKrispy Last Edited by Krispy71 on 03/09/2013 05:06 PM |
