They faked it ! The Moon Landing !!

So people who say the moon landing was fake also believe we went to the moon with technology hidden from us.

There is thrid and fourth party verification that what the astronauts left on the moon are still there.

So now the claim is that the entire moon is a hologram.

Grow up!!!

We're in an era where Concorde is already in a museum.

Left is right
Up is down
Good is bad

Moon landing in 1969 was a hoax.

The USG is infinitely more stupid than that.
Didn't bother them with Columbia and Challenger. Hell, they put a dang teacher on one and had all the little school kiddies watching that one.
But, I spose those never happened either, right?

NASA is not capable to even service ISS anymore and send their astronauts up there, neither cargo

but they were first on the moon, yeah sure

NASA is certainly capable, they did it for years. This was a political decision based on funding, not technical capability.

Nice try.

IF the moon landing happened why don't we have any telescope pictures of the landing site?

EXCELLENT VIDEO OP!

They totally faked the entire thing.. The furthest those aholes got into space is the International Space Station.

and robot landers cannot do this?

Why messing around with quotes?

a political decision based on funding, not technical capability.

do you even understand how stupid does it sound this? NOT A TECHNICAL CAPABILITY?!? OMG

So, please remind me how many poor astronauts died during Shuttle era?
Please remind us all as a honour to these people.

Just a reminder, they were flying to the NEO and back from it!

Spring 2001 Fox airs the moon hoax program on TV.
Fall 2001 9-11 attack


See a pattern here?

Saying that NASA is incapable (technically) of servicing ISS, and then inferring that they were not capable of going to the moon is inaccurate. NASA serviced ISS for many years, and stopped manned missions to ISS for political and budgetary reasons.

Too many astronauts dies during shuttle era, aand too many before that in Apollo. and saying that people died going to NEO does not logically follow that going to the moon was impossible.

I always hear this argument:

"Russia would have said something if we faked it"

Why? That would bring their own space program into question. The Russian government was also benefiting just like the US! Also, the Russian and US governments were never against each other, that's only a show they put on. They are all friends. The illusion of being enemies made both governments incredibly wealthy!

Thanks for proving my point. They couldn't get the space shuttle into low Earth orbit without killing 7 people. But you think they sent 12 people to the moon 6 times without a hiccup? They orbited and landed on the moon in the only six soft landings in the history of space travel. They could never do it before and they could never do it after. But landing six times with untested technology on an alien world with no tech problems. Sure they did. Sure.

Check "Dawes limit" which shows how big the aperture of a telescope needs to be to resolve such a small angle (the apparent size of the lunar module at the distance of the moon).

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The government's hiring of shills must be on the down side. They can't seem to write complete sentences or possess coherent arguments. It started with Sandy Hook. I think that they lowered the IQ qualifications of the shill hiring. Sort of like the same thing they are doing with Police hirings.

Too much politic in your posts dude.

So, you don't know (or don't care) who and how many died in Shuttles?

Do you even understand what NEO means, or how FAR is it from the MOON?!?

So, if NASA is not capable or can't or have no interest, no "political" will, why do they PAY to Russians to send their men and women up there to ISS.

Why so "superior" space agency leaves old "enemies" to do their jobs, up there in NEO?

I know why, but it's not political.

There is a not-so-secret war waged inside America's multiple times infiltrated,modified and corrupt governing body?

They could point the Hubble and it would see the landing sites.

They got many people into low Earth orbit before the 7 died on Challenger.

Nope. Dawes limit applies to Hubble as well. And Hubble is not that much closer to the moon than the terrestial based telescopes.

Thank you!! The hoaxers deal in nothing but illogic and hyperbole. to wit:
"they couldn't get the space shuttle into low earth orbit without killing 7 people". As logical as saying that the US has no airplanes because we are incapable of driving cars without 50,000 people per year being killed.

"But landing six times with untested technology on an alien world with no tech problems". The technology was tested and there were tech problems.

They just make up stories as they go.

lol


So they took the stuff they left with them in the craft they didnt show,to claim it proves a diffrent method of travel is just silly.
And no im not claiming the moons a hologram thats your silly addition.

there is no sound in a vacume

They couldn't get it into orbit 135 times without killing 14 people.
Nobody ever said space travel isn't dangerous.

The STS had the disadvantage of having been designed as a multi-purpose vehicle.
The causes of the Shuttle disasters would not have killed an Apollo crew.


"Without a hiccup" is a hoaxie fantasy.
Things went wrong on all missions.


There have been plenty of soft landings in the history of space travel.


Nobody tried before.
Nobody tried since.


"untested technology"
"with no tech problems"
Those things could only be claimed by someone utterly and totally ignorant of Project Apollo.

Hoaxies just don't seem to understand that EVIDENCE not only has to be factual, but that those facts actually have to be TRUE.



Your logical fallacy: argument from incredulity.



There are no Earth-based telescopes big enough.
The only telescopes big enough AND close enough are those on the LRO.
We DO have pictures of those.


Your logical fallacy: bare assertion.

Hoaxies are the masters of the unsubstantiated claim.



I dismissed a factually incorrect statement.
Only charged particles can be captured by magnetic fields.
Someone who doesn't know the difference between charged particle radiation and electromagnetic radiation should not use radiation as an "argument".


The suits weren't worn during the crossing of the VARBS.
They were worn on the surface of the Moon.
Which isn't even near the VARBs


That is a meaningless statement.
All matter attenuates radiation.
The question is HOW MUCH?



So you believe that just believing something makes it true?
Never mind the evidence?
Hoaxies never even know the evidence.
Only the lies invented by the hoax promoters.


You are not forced to do anything.
Nobody cares what you believe.

But rational adults expect you to provide EVIDENCE for your claims.


Methinks the lad projects too much...

You are lost in a quagmire of ignorance and superstition.
And you will remain lost until you acquire the necessary intellectual tools for ascertaining truth.



And they would.
For an observer close enough, or having a telescope big enough.
Nobody is close enough, or has a telescope big enough.


You will need to proof your assertion.
How close does one need to be to see these reflections without a telescope?
How big a telescope does an Earthbound observer need to have to see these reflections.
With out proper answers to these questions you are just begging the question.

The answers are:
- Closer than Earth ever gets.
- Bigger than any telescope in existence.

Why do you continue to waste your energy on this? So much wasted time, on both sides... and for what?

Ok, we went, so fucking what? Not like it helped us achieve anything, we're still on Earth, no where near going anywhere.

Ok, we faked is, so fucking what? What are you going to do about it? Yeah... same thing you did about all the rest of these gov. hoaxes, nothing... because it's engineered this way, you're the cog they all bet on... and you are doing your job perfectly.

Instead of putting your energy into something that actually has potential to change anything, you waste it here, with 50 year old non-sense.

Choice is yours, but shit is getting really tiring.

You are just playing into their game. Staying occupied with stupid nitpicking that doesn't matter anymore... they rely on this. They hope for it and you are serving it on a silver platter, silver mined from your own life energy.

"Oh but I want to wake people up" Ok... then what the fuck are you doing here? This is the choir, you're not going to wake up anyone here anymore than they already are or will ever be. So what's the point? If your first internal answer was to waste time, then you are doing exactly what they want.

Congratulations.