They faked it ! The Moon Landing !! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34613724 United States 03/08/2013 12:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34613724 United States 03/08/2013 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Regardless of if they actually got to the moon or not, Quoting: ehecatl why should common people of the nation be forced to pay for it? It was all about propaganda first, and not about science. The more lies the public swallows, the more likely they are to accept future lies. It's a conditioning tool as well as a financial enslavement. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35762718 Croatia 03/08/2013 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
wing-ed
(OP) User ID: 34875711 United States 03/08/2013 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's been 50 years and no one else has been able to duplicate the moon landing , that should be added to the evidence of it never happening !! I do believe that the Black program that this was designed to cover has been successful !! Holy, holy,holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come.Praise the one who gives you peace beyond all understanding Yes that scripture still sounds good ! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33331142 Canada 03/08/2013 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1482838 United States 03/08/2013 12:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ya think them mirrors would reflect bright spots back to earth when the shine shines on the moon Exactly. You'd think there would be brighter mirror glints off the moonlit surface. But, there aren't, of course. Never breed. Too late! HA! Yes, no reason to think a mirror on the moon, if there was one or two, would reflect light at a brighter intensity than the moon surface. They would indeed, if they were there, which they are not and is demonstrably another lie by NASA. Not perhaps with the naked eye. But, most assuredly, with telescopes these brighter glints would be discernable if they were present. Or even any shiny metal like the gold foil of the modules. These too would be greater reflective surfaces, which do not show up because they are not there. |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
User ID: 31033756 Netherlands 03/08/2013 12:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The most important question to date: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34613724 If the space suits could protect astronauts from the gamma radiation belts, why are they not be used to inspect or clean Fukushima There are no gamma radiation belts. Only the Soviets ever tried. They had, uhm.., difficulties. It would only be evidence if you could proof beyond reasonable doubt that the ONLY POSSIBLE REASON no government authorised such ridiculous expenditures is that they know it is not possible to go to the Moon. And added to? There ain't any yet. People not bothering to dissect your lying video lie by lie doesn't mean they are not lies. If you can't be bother to present the evidence yourself, so we know you know what you are talking about, what would be the point? I do believe that the Black program that this was designed to cover has been successful !! Quoting: wing-ed What you believe is immaterial. Truth can only be determined by a critical and unbiased examination of the evidence. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27459048 Netherlands 03/08/2013 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fact that the original recording of the NASA moon landing could not be found already proofs that they never went to the moon. Quoting: Dutch Moran 27459048 Define "original recording". What data exactly is mising? The moonlanding? Never heard of Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17, have you? At that time you have given us a piece of moon rock. Quoting: Dutch Moran 27459048 Proof it. Nobody got moonrocks in 1969. Not even presidents and kings. Not even Kosygin. So why would Middendorf give one to a private citizen and only to him? On the same day he met the queen? The whole silly story doesn't add up. Well, hear the king himself speak. You're pretty lost. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35718276 United Kingdom 03/08/2013 01:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
User ID: 31033756 Netherlands 03/08/2013 01:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, no reason to think a mirror on the moon, if there was one or two, would reflect light at a brighter intensity than the moon surface. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1482838 You don't believe in retroflectors? Retroflective materials are used extensively on traffic signs here. I see them every day. They would indeed, if they were there, which they are not and is demonstrably another lie by NASA. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1482838 What? Not perhaps with the naked eye. But, most assuredly, with telescopes these brighter glints would be discernable if they were present. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1482838 You understand that retroflectors reflect most light directly back to where it came from? The Sun, the retroflector and the observer on Earth would only line-up during a lunar eclipse. Or even any shiny metal like the gold foil of the modules. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1482838 These too would be greater reflective surfaces, which do not show up because they are not there. I hope you are just poeing. The reflective surfaces you are talking about are small (the descend stage is about 6 metres across at its widest) and more than a lightsecond away. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27459048 Netherlands 03/08/2013 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The most important question to date: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34613724 If the space suits could protect astronauts from the gamma radiation belts, why are they not be used to inspect or clean Fukushima There are no gamma radiation belts. Only the Soviets ever tried. They had, uhm.., difficulties. It would only be evidence if you could proof beyond reasonable doubt that the ONLY POSSIBLE REASON no government authorised such ridiculous expenditures is that they know it is not possible to go to the Moon. And added to? There ain't any yet. People not bothering to dissect your lying video lie by lie doesn't mean they are not lies. If you can't be bother to present the evidence yourself, so we know you know what you are talking about, what would be the point? I do believe that the Black program that this was designed to cover has been successful !! Quoting: wing-ed What you believe is immaterial. Truth can only be determined by a critical and unbiased examination of the evidence. What you believe is immaterial. Truth can only be determined by a critical and unbiased examination of the evidence. book. Are YOU that dumb!? I understand that we are forced to believe you... You are pretty lost. You are pretty lost. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14191002 United States 03/08/2013 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1482838 United States 03/08/2013 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes, no reason to think a mirror on the moon, if there was one or two, would reflect light at a brighter intensity than the moon surface. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1482838 You don't believe in retroflectors? Retroflective materials are used extensively on traffic signs here. I see them every day. They would indeed, if they were there, which they are not and is demonstrably another lie by NASA. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1482838 What? Not perhaps with the naked eye. But, most assuredly, with telescopes these brighter glints would be discernable if they were present. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1482838 You understand that retroflectors reflect most light directly back to where it came from? The Sun, the retroflector and the observer on Earth would only line-up during a lunar eclipse. Or even any shiny metal like the gold foil of the modules. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1482838 These too would be greater reflective surfaces, which do not show up because they are not there. I hope you are just poeing. The reflective surfaces you are talking about are small (the descend stage is about 6 metres across at its widest) and more than a lightsecond away. :classic-facepalm: The first line you quote was sarcasm on my part. Nothing you wrote refutes the fact that if there are reflective surfaces like mirrors and gold foil on the moon that they would show up as glints of light brighter than the ambient reflectivity of the moon's surface. There are not. Because there are no mirrors nor gold foil on the moon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35781524 United Kingdom 03/08/2013 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | NASA faked images and film because they didn't have the technology to satisfy the gullible tax payers who were paying for a pointless cold war exercise. The lie has begun to find them out, but there is no way back. In my opinion, there is little doubt that man did step on the moon, it's just a case of what actually happened as opposed to what they showed us. We will never know for sure. Digital imagery can now fake anything. By the time people are able to take a look for themselves (which will NEVER happen) they would be able to recreate everything - if it was still that important. By the time history catches up, no one will give a f*** anyway. History is full of lies, extortions and misrepresentations. Most inquiring academic know this, they also know that it is pointless trying to set the record straight, they just go with "the line" for an easy life and a tidy salary. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34613724 United States 03/08/2013 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The most important question to date: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34613724 If the space suits could protect astronauts from the gamma radiation belts, why are they not be used to inspect or clean Fukushima There are no gamma radiation belts. Only the Soviets ever tried. They had, uhm.., difficulties. It would only be evidence if you could proof beyond reasonable doubt that the ONLY POSSIBLE REASON no government authorised such ridiculous expenditures is that they know it is not possible to go to the Moon. And added to? There ain't any yet. People not bothering to dissect your lying video lie by lie doesn't mean they are not lies. If you can't be bother to present the evidence yourself, so we know you know what you are talking about, what would be the point? I do believe that the Black program that this was designed to cover has been successful !! Quoting: wing-ed What you believe is immaterial. Truth can only be determined by a critical and unbiased examination of the evidence. So you dismiss the van Allen belt because of the word gamma? It is still a radiation belt. That NASA admitted their suits can ot withstand radiation |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35762718 Croatia 03/08/2013 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Now take a look at this "proof" NASA is waving in front of sheeple all the time [link to upload.wikimedia.org] if that is not hilarious I don't know what it is? |
Kil User ID: 31534752 Canada 03/08/2013 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 658249 Netherlands 03/08/2013 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 945712 Canada 03/08/2013 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35654787 United States 03/08/2013 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thread title should be Moon Landing'S There's been 6 and 12 people actually on the Moon. To date,of the Thousands of people involved not one has ever come forward with any claim of a hoax,Not even the Russians who would have certainly discredited our moon missions,if they could. Moontards are so stupid.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1580336 United States 03/08/2013 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They think that the US would let two astronauts possibly die on the surface in front of 300 million people watching. Let's face it the chances of an accident were huge. Do you really think that the USG is that stupid? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35653930 Ireland 03/08/2013 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35762718 Croatia 03/08/2013 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The thread title should be Moon Landing'S Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35654787 There's been 6 and 12 people actually on the Moon. To date,of the Thousands of people involved not one has ever come forward with any claim of a hoax,Not even the Russians who would have certainly discredited our moon missions,if they could. Moontards are so stupid.. u mean 12 moonkeys, right? |
NoSilence
User ID: 35780738 Mexico 03/08/2013 01:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1580336 United States 03/08/2013 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The mirrors would be useless anyway as they are really very small. A laser beam spreads to about 1500 meters over 240000 mile trip to the moon. So therefore the mirrors would be useless. Simple science and facts are what is needed not shill propagandists who believe everything they are told. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35762718 Croatia 03/08/2013 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | but they were first on the moon, yeah sure They had numerous accidents and dead astronauts during Appolo scam and even years later with two huge disasters of Shuttle with how many dead .....? OMG But they went to another space object 50 years ago with only one "accident" with (oh coincidence) Appolo 13 |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35654787 United States 03/08/2013 01:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The people who think we went to the moon are really coming off poorly here. They insult but don't explain. The accept what they are told without questioning anything. They think that the government wouldn't lie to them or steal their money. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1580336 They think that the US would let two astronauts possibly die on the surface in front of 300 million people watching. Let's face it the chances of an accident were huge. Do you really think that the USG is that stupid? The subject has been absolutely worn out. As a moontard you should be offering more than a YouTube video. You expect too much. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14191002 United States 03/08/2013 01:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MHz
User ID: 34243878 Canada 03/08/2013 01:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The only people who faked it on a regular basis are your mother and your girlfriends/wife/ex-wife. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33331142 You are speaking about your own past in all likelihood. Well I'm taking my fake truck to the fake store to buy some fake stuff with my fake money, later. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 945712 We'll see how long that fake happy attitude lasts. I'm going to go with 1/2 leaving as soon as you see the price-tags. Last Edited by MHz on 03/08/2013 01:53 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31189143 Canada 03/08/2013 02:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |