|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
They faked it ! The Moon Landing !!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Screw it |
|
Post Content
|
The closest, supposedly reachable, celestial body and what do we have to show for it? Pictures of a brilliant backdrop with glorious stars from a completely new perspective, no. We get tons of videos and pictures absent a starry moon sky. Naked eye observations of such, no. According to Collins at the subsequent Apollo 11 press conference, he didn't even recall seeing them. Neil and Buzz followed suit.
We get video returned with invisible astronauts which give credence to those who suspect film fraud. Pictures returned with images depicting a simultaneous focus of foreground and background objects also point to trick photography. Cross hairs covered over in images also point to fraud.
Also suspect, shadows cast at different angles pointing to the use of stage lighting rather than a single source of light which would have been the sun.
In later missions, moon buggy images shown in several different locations absent leading and trailing tire track imprints point to fraud as well. This would be consistent with a crane placing the vehicles on a film stage though or a solidified concrete terrain. This, however, would not be consistent with a substance so easily imprinted with an astronaut boot. Also present on almost all unmolested versions of the Apollo mission photos is a vague terminating line consistent with stage props placed in front of a backdrop.
If it walks like a duck, swims like a duck, looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...my friends, what you have here is a duck.
Quoting: SC22 28817449 That sums it up quite well.  uhm oh uhm khm great achievement...khm uhm oh... stars? don't remember seen any  Psycho... please someone call Hitchcock
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
