They faked it ! The Moon Landing !! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2658310 United States 03/17/2013 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183 Of course hoaxies don't see anything wrong with this. Their idea of a job is clerk at Wallmart's. The idea of knowing anything about the corporate descision-making process that changes the price structure or the layout of the aisles is completely alien.... OK, let's discuss this. The closest, supposedly reachable, celestial body which could yield mountains of information about outer space and NASA picks up, packs up, and decides to head to Mars instead. Really? Seems to me, corporately thinking of course, that the most cost effective study would be right here on our "reachable" moon. Huge craters that would yield many objects to study. These objects could then be continuously returned to earth for hands on physical analysis. Yet, where are all of these yields? Well, NASA prefers distant study and video....much more beneficial. Why do you continue with a red herring. There is absolutlely nothing that can be seen from the Moon that can be seen from Earth orbit. Apollo was not about astronomy. It was a cold war demonstration of power with the secondary goal of studying the Moon's GEOLOGY. Can you look up the word GEOLOGY and figure out what that means? It isn't astronomy. Are you retarded or something. Taking objects from craters on the moon and returning them for study is an act consistent with Geology numb skull. But, to understate the astrological possibilities from the moon mission is asinine. Both would be valuable studies on a true moon mission. Also moron, is isn't Astrological. God damn idiot. |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
User ID: 31033756 Netherlands 03/17/2013 06:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | HAHAHA YOU FAIL Here lemme fix that for you, " Is your keyboard missing any of these letters: 'g' 'o' 'o' 'g' 'l' 'e' Your keyboard has 2 g's and 2 o's? Curiouser and curiouser... Your dodging the point about the void in historical record regarding one Mr. Tom Kelly is duly noted. We can now add "If it isn't on the internet it doesn't exist" to the long list of claims SC22 will never actually bother to proof. Aaaand another one. Keep'm coming. I can use some cheering up. This one is particularly delicious. Thank you, thank you. The only things one needs to do astrology is a piece of paper, a pencil, and a wild imagination. No need to travel. Repeating your claim ad nauseam doesn't make it any less silly. Fuck off! This is GLP, not a coffee klatsch. Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |
SC22 User ID: 28817449 United States 03/17/2013 06:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: SC22 28817449 OK, let's discuss this. The closest, supposedly reachable, celestial body which could yield mountains of information about outer space and NASA picks up, packs up, and decides to head to Mars instead. Really? Seems to me, corporately thinking of course, that the most cost effective study would be right here on our "reachable" moon. Huge craters that would yield many objects to study. These objects could then be continuously returned to earth for hands on physical analysis. Yet, where are all of these yields? Well, NASA prefers distant study and video....much more beneficial. Why do you continue with a red herring. There is absolutlely nothing that can be seen from the Moon that can be seen from Earth orbit. Apollo was not about astronomy. It was a cold war demonstration of power with the secondary goal of studying the Moon's GEOLOGY. Can you look up the word GEOLOGY and figure out what that means? It isn't astronomy. Are you retarded or something. Taking objects from craters on the moon and returning them for study is an act consistent with Geology numb skull. But, to understate the astrological possibilities from the moon mission is asinine. Both would be valuable studies on a true moon mission. You said "mountains of information about outer space" Duh! not "mountains of information about the Moon". Maybe you should read what you write. Ok. Do you see those huge craters on the moon? Those lead most to believe that objects from "outer space" impacted the moon at some point. Fragments from those objects were most likely left behind during such times of impact. Those fragments would still be valuable to study if we were utilizing our resources wisely. Hence..."mountains of information about outer space." The problem isn't my writing but rather your reading comprehension level. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15645732 Australia 03/17/2013 06:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
nomuse (not logged in) User ID: 2380183 United States 03/17/2013 06:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Unlike most, I don't believe everything returned from a Google search. I know you'd like that, cause than I'd believe we landed a friggin man on the moon now wouldn't I. I went to NASA.gov and scrubbed through that site for any bit of information that was more than superficial in nature regarding the LM. Instead I found a maze of disorganized information. If I came here posting facts from an invalid source, you'd be all over that like white on rice. I politely asked for pointers to resources of the LM. Capable payloads, dimensions for cargo, yet, true to form, the NASA site is a maze of everything but things like this. This excuses you from being able to use search tools? First you say you don't trust information which is too easily available. Then you moan that the information you wanted wasn't easily available. It is out there. It just takes work to put it all together. You couldn't. Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD You haven't managed to find a single fact so far. I doubt you could find your behind without directions. Are you suggesting that the LM designs were substituted for toilet paper at the NASA headquarters? Wouldn't surprise me with all of the original moon footage that was lost and subsequently taped over. That's analogous to Thomas Jefferson accidentally writing over the Constitution. NASA can put a man on the moon, but can't safeguard the original footage of it. And after your cursory search, you decided it was all destroyed? But there is a deeper problem here. NASA didn't design the LM! NASA designed the MISSION. GRUMMAN designed the LM. NASA never owned the construction blueprints, and those were retained by the contractor. So not only are they not just waiting for a two-minute look-see, they also aren't all neatly stacked under the one acronym everyone seems to remember. OK. Thanks. Appreciate the sliver of information in your adhom sandwich. Perhaps, if you're so kind, you could point me towards a resource that has information about him prior the year 2000? Call me sceptical, but I find it suspicious that this guy appears in zero newspaper articles during that period of time when we defied a 0.0017 chance of landing a man on the moon in a lander he supposedly designed. Call me skeptical that you can source that figure. Oh, and how firm are you on "prior to 2000?" I can beat that by two years just by turning my head towards the DVD rack I have on the wall. |
nomuse (not logged in) User ID: 2380183 United States 03/17/2013 06:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183 Of course hoaxies don't see anything wrong with this. Their idea of a job is clerk at Wallmart's. The idea of knowing anything about the corporate descision-making process that changes the price structure or the layout of the aisles is completely alien.... OK, let's discuss this. The closest, supposedly reachable, celestial body which could yield mountains of information about outer space and NASA picks up, packs up, and decides to head to Mars instead. Really? Seems to me, corporately thinking of course, that the most cost effective study would be right here on our "reachable" moon. Huge craters that would yield many objects to study. These objects could then be continuously returned to earth for hands on physical analysis. Yet, where are all of these yields? Well, NASA prefers distant study and video....much more beneficial. My quoted material above has nothing to do with your reply. Oh, and hundreds of kilos of rock, soil samples, and cores. Not exactly "distant video," is it? Plus are you aware of just how many scientific instruments were left on the Moon, and how little of the telemetry stream was ever about video? |
thomowen20
User ID: 32944385 United States 03/17/2013 06:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is GLP, not a coffee klatsch. Quoting: Halcyon DayzTrue, this isn't a coffee klatsch. Here on GLP we have the report abuse button. In non-virtual settings, including coffee klatsches, one has the back room... Intuition is the inertial force of conscious thought. |
SC22 User ID: 28817449 United States 03/17/2013 06:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | We can now add "If it isn't on the internet it doesn't exist" to the long list of claims SC22 will never actually bother to proof. Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD Well according to you Mr. Dayz, all I need is a keyboard equipped with the letters "g", "o", "l", and "e". You insinuated that the Internet had all the answers. That's your insinuation and demonstration of self ignorance, not mine. |
Menow User ID: 36389814 United States 03/17/2013 06:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your dodging the point about the void in historical record regarding one Mr. Tom Kelly is duly noted. Man defies a .0017 set of odds by designing a craft supposedly landed on the moon and zippidy doo dah day finally writes a book about it 30+ years after the fact. Did I miss it or did you never cite a specific communication where there was a problem with the time-delay and speed of light thing? If I recall correctly, you cited a vid which showed an edited transmission, is that right? Did you just change topics when that was pointed out to you? That's what I would expect from you. |
nomuse (not logged in) User ID: 2380183 United States 03/17/2013 06:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why do you continue with a red herring. There is absolutlely nothing that can be seen from the Moon that can be seen from Earth orbit. Apollo was not about astronomy. It was a cold war demonstration of power with the secondary goal of studying the Moon's GEOLOGY. Can you look up the word GEOLOGY and figure out what that means? It isn't astronomy. Quoting: SC22 28817449 Are you retarded or something. Taking objects from craters on the moon and returning them for study is an act consistent with Geology numb skull. But, to understate the astrological possibilities from the moon mission is asinine. Both would be valuable studies on a true moon mission. Understanding the geology of the Moon can be done in a number of ways. At the moment we are looking at the whole Moon, with ever more sophisticated remote sensing. For instance, more detailed gravity maps. I don't care how many astronauts or rovers you send there, you aren't going to be able to generate an accurate and detailed map of the Moon's gravity! Understanding the astrology of the Moon, on the other hand, requires nothing but a protractor, some colored pens, and the ability to make up portentous-sounding bullshit. |
Menow User ID: 36389814 United States 03/17/2013 06:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183 Of course hoaxies don't see anything wrong with this. Their idea of a job is clerk at Wallmart's. The idea of knowing anything about the corporate descision-making process that changes the price structure or the layout of the aisles is completely alien.... OK, let's discuss this. The closest, supposedly reachable, celestial body which could yield mountains of information about outer space and NASA picks up, packs up, and decides to head to Mars instead. Really? Seems to me, corporately thinking of course, that the most cost effective study would be right here on our "reachable" moon. Huge craters that would yield many objects to study. These objects could then be continuously returned to earth for hands on physical analysis. Yet, where are all of these yields? Well, NASA prefers distant study and video....much more beneficial. Why do you continue with a red herring. There is absolutlely nothing that can be seen from the Moon that can be seen from Earth orbit. Apollo was not about astronomy. It was a cold war demonstration of power with the secondary goal of studying the Moon's GEOLOGY. Can you look up the word GEOLOGY and figure out what that means? It isn't astronomy. Are you retarded or something. Taking objects from craters on the moon and returning them for study is an act consistent with Geology numb skull. But, to understate the astrological possibilities from the moon mission is asinine. Both would be valuable studies on a true moon mission. AGAIN I challenge you to provide data on how equipment which could have been hauled to the moon on Apollo would have provided superior images to those from existing high-elevation Earth scopes. |
SC22 User ID: 28817449 United States 03/17/2013 06:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your dodging the point about the void in historical record regarding one Mr. Tom Kelly is duly noted. Man defies a .0017 set of odds by designing a craft supposedly landed on the moon and zippidy doo dah day finally writes a book about it 30+ years after the fact. Did I miss it or did you never cite a specific communication where there was a problem with the time-delay and speed of light thing? If I recall correctly, you cited a vid which showed an edited transmission, is that right? Did you just change topics when that was pointed out to you? That's what I would expect from you. The very first mission. The Eagle has landed. One small step for man, one giant radio wave leap past the speed of light! |
SC22 User ID: 28817449 United States 03/17/2013 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: SC22 28817449 OK, let's discuss this. The closest, supposedly reachable, celestial body which could yield mountains of information about outer space and NASA picks up, packs up, and decides to head to Mars instead. Really? Seems to me, corporately thinking of course, that the most cost effective study would be right here on our "reachable" moon. Huge craters that would yield many objects to study. These objects could then be continuously returned to earth for hands on physical analysis. Yet, where are all of these yields? Well, NASA prefers distant study and video....much more beneficial. Why do you continue with a red herring. There is absolutlely nothing that can be seen from the Moon that can be seen from Earth orbit. Apollo was not about astronomy. It was a cold war demonstration of power with the secondary goal of studying the Moon's GEOLOGY. Can you look up the word GEOLOGY and figure out what that means? It isn't astronomy. Are you retarded or something. Taking objects from craters on the moon and returning them for study is an act consistent with Geology numb skull. But, to understate the astrological possibilities from the moon mission is asinine. Both would be valuable studies on a true moon mission. AGAIN I challenge you to provide data on how equipment which could have been hauled to the moon on Apollo would have provided superior images to those from existing high-elevation Earth scopes. High elevation= still in the atmosphere of earth. Do you believe the atmosphere has no effect on sky viewing? |
SC22 User ID: 28817449 United States 03/17/2013 06:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183 Of course hoaxies don't see anything wrong with this. Their idea of a job is clerk at Wallmart's. The idea of knowing anything about the corporate descision-making process that changes the price structure or the layout of the aisles is completely alien.... OK, let's discuss this. The closest, supposedly reachable, celestial body which could yield mountains of information about outer space and NASA picks up, packs up, and decides to head to Mars instead. Really? Seems to me, corporately thinking of course, that the most cost effective study would be right here on our "reachable" moon. Huge craters that would yield many objects to study. These objects could then be continuously returned to earth for hands on physical analysis. Yet, where are all of these yields? Well, NASA prefers distant study and video....much more beneficial. My quoted material above has nothing to do with your reply. Oh, but it does. You alluded to the corporate expertise of NASA. If NASA were in charge of buying my groceries they wouldn't buy from the store right down the street. No, they'd opt to go to the next country over for the same groceries and spend more $ doing it. They'd pay some mechanics to build a car, shoot a video of somebody grocery shopping, and leave me starving at home all the while claiming how well they fed me. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2658310 United States 03/17/2013 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2658310 Why do you continue with a red herring. There is absolutlely nothing that can be seen from the Moon that can be seen from Earth orbit. Apollo was not about astronomy. It was a cold war demonstration of power with the secondary goal of studying the Moon's GEOLOGY. Can you look up the word GEOLOGY and figure out what that means? It isn't astronomy. Are you retarded or something. Taking objects from craters on the moon and returning them for study is an act consistent with Geology numb skull. But, to understate the astrological possibilities from the moon mission is asinine. Both would be valuable studies on a true moon mission. You said "mountains of information about outer space" Duh! not "mountains of information about the Moon". Maybe you should read what you write. Ok. Do you see those huge craters on the moon? Those lead most to believe that objects from "outer space" impacted the moon at some point. Fragments from those objects were most likely left behind during such times of impact. Those fragments would still be valuable to study if we were utilizing our resources wisely. Hence..."mountains of information about outer space." The problem isn't my writing but rather your reading comprehension level. Nope. Your still a moron. Fragments from the Moon have been found on Earth from those impacts. But I have said while you were babbling about all the stars that you can see from the Moon that you can't see from Earth, that the primary reason was GEOLOGY. So again, all you present is red herrings. |
thomowen20
User ID: 32944385 United States 03/17/2013 07:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: SC22 28817449 Are you retarded or something. Taking objects from craters on the moon and returning them for study is an act consistent with Geology numb skull. But, to understate the astrological possibilities from the moon mission is asinine. Both would be valuable studies on a true moon mission. You said "mountains of information about outer space" Duh! not "mountains of information about the Moon". Maybe you should read what you write. Ok. Do you see those huge craters on the moon? Those lead most to believe that objects from "outer space" impacted the moon at some point. Fragments from those objects were most likely left behind during such times of impact. Those fragments would still be valuable to study if we were utilizing our resources wisely. Hence..."mountains of information about outer space." The problem isn't my writing but rather your reading comprehension level. Nope. Your still a moron. Fragments from the Moon have been found on Earth from those impacts. But I have said while you were babbling about all the stars that you can see from the Moon that you can't see from Earth, that the primary reason was GEOLOGY. So again, all you present is red herrings. Replies the fellow who gets "your" and "you're" mixed up. Still, I won't call either one of you morons, just argumentative, insulting and typical. Intuition is the inertial force of conscious thought. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2658310 United States 03/17/2013 07:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your dodging the point about the void in historical record regarding one Mr. Tom Kelly is duly noted. Man defies a .0017 set of odds by designing a craft supposedly landed on the moon and zippidy doo dah day finally writes a book about it 30+ years after the fact. Did I miss it or did you never cite a specific communication where there was a problem with the time-delay and speed of light thing? If I recall correctly, you cited a vid which showed an edited transmission, is that right? Did you just change topics when that was pointed out to you? That's what I would expect from you. The very first mission. The Eagle has landed. One small step for man, one giant radio wave leap past the speed of light! Red herring. This has been explained to you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2658310 United States 03/17/2013 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2658310 You said "mountains of information about outer space" Duh! not "mountains of information about the Moon". Maybe you should read what you write. Ok. Do you see those huge craters on the moon? Those lead most to believe that objects from "outer space" impacted the moon at some point. Fragments from those objects were most likely left behind during such times of impact. Those fragments would still be valuable to study if we were utilizing our resources wisely. Hence..."mountains of information about outer space." The problem isn't my writing but rather your reading comprehension level. Nope. Your still a moron. Fragments from the Moon have been found on Earth from those impacts. But I have said while you were babbling about all the stars that you can see from the Moon that you can't see from Earth, that the primary reason was GEOLOGY. So again, all you present is red herrings. Replies the fellow who gets "your" and "you're" mixed up. Still, I won't call either one of you morons, just argumentative, insulting and typical. Ah, the typo Nazi. Shall we go and find all YOUR typos? |
nomuse (not logged in) User ID: 2380183 United States 03/17/2013 07:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh, but it does. You alluded to the corporate expertise of NASA. If NASA were in charge of buying my groceries they wouldn't buy from the store right down the street. No, they'd opt to go to the next country over for the same groceries and spend more $ doing it. They'd pay some mechanics to build a car, shoot a video of somebody grocery shopping, and leave me starving at home all the while claiming how well they fed me. Quoting: SC22 28817449 Read my post again. It wasn't very organized -- got a head cold and not enough coffee. But I think it is clear the decision-making process under discussion is that of the individual engineer, not that of his employers. Whether NASA is idiotic enough to attempt to compartmentalize without telling anyone they are being compartmentalized (good luck with that!), they are still dealing with individual workers who know more about their specialties then "NASA" does (or why else would they be hired?) and who are enthusiastic and curious and interested in the challenge. The kind of person you ask to design a lightweight rover is NOT the kind of person you say to, "You don't need to know the load-carrying capacity of the LM, or the planned duration of the EVA your rover will be used on." Referring back to Hal's post, these are people who aren't making a widget that they don't understand, these are people who are making a part that can work in space. That fulfills not just some checklist made by NASA, but physics. |
Weasel_Turbine
User ID: 35829559 United States 03/17/2013 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your dodging the point about the void in historical record regarding one Mr. Tom Kelly is duly noted. Man defies a .0017 set of odds by designing a craft supposedly landed on the moon and zippidy doo dah day finally writes a book about it 30+ years after the fact. Did I miss it or did you never cite a specific communication where there was a problem with the time-delay and speed of light thing? If I recall correctly, you cited a vid which showed an edited transmission, is that right? Did you just change topics when that was pointed out to you? That's what I would expect from you. The very first mission. The Eagle has landed. One small step for man, one giant radio wave leap past the speed of light! You didn't prove that assertion before and you still haven't now. Found any unedited audio to try to back up your assertion yet? Why not? If you have to insist that you've won an Internet argument, you've probably lost badly. - Danth's Law |
Menow User ID: 12288415 United States 03/17/2013 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2658310 Why do you continue with a red herring. There is absolutlely nothing that can be seen from the Moon that can be seen from Earth orbit. Apollo was not about astronomy. It was a cold war demonstration of power with the secondary goal of studying the Moon's GEOLOGY. Can you look up the word GEOLOGY and figure out what that means? It isn't astronomy. Are you retarded or something. Taking objects from craters on the moon and returning them for study is an act consistent with Geology numb skull. But, to understate the astrological possibilities from the moon mission is asinine. Both would be valuable studies on a true moon mission. AGAIN I challenge you to provide data on how equipment which could have been hauled to the moon on Apollo would have provided superior images to those from existing high-elevation Earth scopes. High elevation= still in the atmosphere of earth. Do you believe the atmosphere has no effect on sky viewing? This is not an answer to my question. Do you think the size of a scope has no effect on sky viewing? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2658310 United States 03/17/2013 09:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: SC22 28817449 Are you retarded or something. Taking objects from craters on the moon and returning them for study is an act consistent with Geology numb skull. But, to understate the astrological possibilities from the moon mission is asinine. Both would be valuable studies on a true moon mission. AGAIN I challenge you to provide data on how equipment which could have been hauled to the moon on Apollo would have provided superior images to those from existing high-elevation Earth scopes. High elevation= still in the atmosphere of earth. Do you believe the atmosphere has no effect on sky viewing? This is not an answer to my question. Do you think the size of a scope has no effect on sky viewing? Large ground based telescopes with adaptive optics provide almost as good as Hubble at much less the cost. It has been proven that orbiting telescopes work. The cost of putting a telescope on the Moon would far exceed the cost of building another Hubble and placing it into Earth orbit. There is no scientific gain of a telescope on the Moon over one in Earth orbit. Logistically, it would be far harder from the Moon. |
RoXY
User ID: 33855101 Netherlands 03/17/2013 10:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wernher von Braun In honor of Wernher von Braun. If it wasn't for this sympathetic full blown Nazi - SS officer, we wouldn't have discussed the Moon hoax on GLP. Hail Von Braun!!! [link to www.youtube.com] Fabulous tracks (1988-2013) [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Pure Happiness Thread: FEEL GOOD !!! # FOUR (4) - & more - MINUTES of PURE HAPPINESS !!! # (Videos) Good Food Thread: MONSANTO # (GMO) FOOD 4 THOUGHT - Know What You Eat # (Ongoing Videos & Articles) Watch This! Thread: WATCH THIS !!! # An Ongoing, Carefully Selected Collection of MUST SEE VIDEOS Big Brother Thread: BIG BROTHER in the age of INTERNET # (Ongoing - Links, Articles & Videos) Economy Thread: THE ECONOMY & YOU # (Daily Updated Videos & Articles) UFOs Thread: UFO PHOTOS (1200+) # World UFO Photo Gallery + Ongoing Links, Articles & Videos The Better You Look, The More You See... Educate Yourself! |
RoXY
User ID: 33855101 Netherlands 03/17/2013 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The NASA Nazis Operation Paperclip was the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) program used to recruit the scientists of Nazi Germany for employment by the United States in the aftermath of World War II (1939/45). [link to www.youtube.com] The True History and Purpose of NASA Now, you and I know that those nazi scientists who stood at the cradle of the 'giant step for mankind', knew nothing about the tens of thousands slave laborers who were working at Peenemunde - they were just jolly, peace loving nerds with an interest in rocket science... [link to www.youtube.com] Fabulous tracks (1988-2013) [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Pure Happiness Thread: FEEL GOOD !!! # FOUR (4) - & more - MINUTES of PURE HAPPINESS !!! # (Videos) Good Food Thread: MONSANTO # (GMO) FOOD 4 THOUGHT - Know What You Eat # (Ongoing Videos & Articles) Watch This! Thread: WATCH THIS !!! # An Ongoing, Carefully Selected Collection of MUST SEE VIDEOS Big Brother Thread: BIG BROTHER in the age of INTERNET # (Ongoing - Links, Articles & Videos) Economy Thread: THE ECONOMY & YOU # (Daily Updated Videos & Articles) UFOs Thread: UFO PHOTOS (1200+) # World UFO Photo Gallery + Ongoing Links, Articles & Videos The Better You Look, The More You See... Educate Yourself! |
nomuse (not logged in) User ID: 2380183 United States 03/17/2013 11:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your sense of the sense people have of history is suspect. None of that is news. Not then, not now. Nor is it whitewashed. I mean, hell! You can't study anything about the early history of rocketry without learning about the V2. Terror weapon, used indiscriminately on the civilian population of London, built by slave labor. Next you will be telling us that innocent people died during the Korean War. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2658310 United States 03/18/2013 03:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wernher von Braun Quoting: RoXY In honor of Wernher von Braun. If it wasn't for this sympathetic full blown Nazi - SS officer, we wouldn't have discussed the Moon hoax on GLP. Hail Von Braun!!! [link to www.youtube.com] Reductio ad Hitlerum, also argumentum ad Hitlerum, is a term coined by conservative philosopher Leo Strauss in 1951. According to Strauss, the Reductio ad Hitlerum is an informal fallacy that consists of trying to refute an opponent's view by comparing it to a view that would be held by Adolf Hitler or the Nazi Party. According to Strauss, Reductio ad Hitlerum is a form of ad hominem or ad misericordiam, a fallacy of irrelevance, in which a conclusion is suggested based solely on something's or someone's origin rather than its current meaning. The suggested rationale is one of guilt by association. Its name is a variation on the term reductio ad absurdum. Reductio ad Hitlerum is sometimes called playing the Nazi card, According to its critics and proponents, it is a tactic often used to derail arguments, because such comparisons tend to distract and anger the opponent. In short, you lose. |
Halcyon Dayz, FCD
User ID: 31033756 Netherlands 03/18/2013 07:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is GLP, not a coffee klatsch. Quoting: Halcyon DayzTrue, this isn't a coffee klatsch. Here on GLP we have the report abuse button. Than use it already. See how much patience the mods have with asshead tone trolls. We can now add "If it isn't on the internet it doesn't exist" to the long list of claims SC22 will never actually bother to proof. Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD Well according to you Mr. Dayz, all I need is a keyboard equipped with the letters "g", "o", "l", and "e". You insinuated that the Internet had all the answers. I did what now? It should be able to provide you a clue on where to find stuff. I swear, hoaxies must have some sort of filter that only allows them to find hoax-monger sites. The very first mission. The Eagle has landed. One small step for man, one giant radio wave leap past the speed of light! Quoting: SC22 28817449 Back to the top of your script again already? You weren't able to proof this silly ASSertion the first time you made it. In fact, you havent been able to proof anything you claimed. Doesn't that get frustrating? Doesn't it tell you you should have done your research, and plenty of it, BEFORE spouting your slanderous claims? Wernher von Braun Quoting: RoXY In honor of Wernher von Braun. If it wasn't for this sympathetic full blown Nazi - SS officer, we wouldn't have discussed the Moon hoax on GLP. Hail Von Braun!!! [link to www.youtube.com] Love Tom Lehrer. So, are YOU going to explain why Nazis can't build rocketships? Because the notion that the laws of physics change depending on ones political ideology is rather bewildering. How is this not a Godwin? Reaching for the sky makes you taller. Hi! My name is Halcyon Dayz and I'm addicted to morans. |