|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
They faked it ! The Moon Landing !!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Menow |
|
Post Content
|
...
Of course hoaxies don't see anything wrong with this. Their idea of a job is clerk at Wallmart's. The idea of knowing anything about the corporate descision-making process that changes the price structure or the layout of the aisles is completely alien....
Quoting: nomuse (not logged in) 2380183 OK, let's discuss this. The closest, supposedly reachable, celestial body which could yield mountains of information about outer space and NASA picks up, packs up, and decides to head to Mars instead. Really? Seems to me, corporately thinking of course, that the most cost effective study would be right here on our "reachable" moon. Huge craters that would yield many objects to study. These objects could then be continuously returned to earth for hands on physical analysis. Yet, where are all of these yields? Well, NASA prefers distant study and video....much more beneficial. Why do you continue with a red herring. There is absolutlely nothing that can be seen from the Moon that can be seen from Earth orbit. Apollo was not about astronomy. It was a cold war demonstration of power with the secondary goal of studying the Moon's GEOLOGY. Can you look up the word GEOLOGY and figure out what that means? It isn't astronomy. Are you retarded or something. Taking objects from craters on the moon and returning them for study is an act consistent with Geology numb skull. But, to understate the astrological possibilities from the moon mission is asinine. Both would be valuable studies on a true moon mission. AGAIN I challenge you to provide data on how equipment which could have been hauled to the moon on Apollo would have provided superior images to those from existing high-elevation Earth scopes.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
