UNCUT interview with Georgia mom of baby who was shot. 100% LYING!

You know how aggravating and TIRING it is to take care of a 13 month old all day and night? You don't get to sleep all day. Insurance on her two kids? Really? I'm just curious...how many people in her financial position really go out and get insurance on their kids? Many?

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Interview begins with her going on and on about her own flesh wound then remembers she's on camera and starts conjuring up fake sobs (no tears).
Never says "my son" or "Antonio", distances herself by saying "my baby". Makes him sound more like an object than a person.
Speaks of one singular boy, has to be prompted by media to talk about second person, a "little boy".
Initially she reported the second boy as being 5-10 years old, then when they pick up a 14 year old she quickly corrects her age estimate.
Describes shooter as "very curly hair", as if most African American men have straight hair.
Says second person was a little boy hiding behind teen shooter, implies she didn't get a great look at him, yet when a random teen is picked up, she's positive that's him.
Mentions the shooter's generic curly hair but can't remember that the 2nd supposed suspect actually has hair that is memorable?
At 5 minutes talks about how she needs to run away.
Indicates that everyone is out to get her and wants her family left alone.
Says that the murder of her first son may be connected with her baby shooting.
Talks about her two car accidents "paying out".
Now her own daughter says she is waiting for insurance check for baby.
Never mentions her own daughter.
Own daughter thinks she's full of shit.
Wondering if she got an insurance payout for her oldest son, as her finances are starting to appear dependent on insurance payouts.
Jokes and giggles several times during interview.
The witness is left with a grazed ear and nonthreatening leg wound while the sleeping baby is shot in the face.
Other neighbors all describe the neighborhood as very safe and quiet, yet Sherry says she's afraid of the neighborhood.
Talks about her oldest son being a victim when in fact her oldest son assaulted another kid with a knife and he fought back in self defense.
Claims in interviews that the shooter was scared off by her screams but apparently he wasn't phased by all the sounds of gunfire he was making.
Her most recent interview shows she's dyed her hair and doesn't even seem sure about the shooter, just happy to latch onto whoever they have picked up. In previous interviews called them little boys, now calls them men. Describes the baby as "walking around, waking me up", sounds like she collects disability, sleeps and is waiting for her next payout.
Already talking about having another baby, several times.
Not a single tear shed.
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Mom's story questioned by daughter after baby killed:
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
She immediately packed up his stuff to donate.
She is moving.
She is waiting for the insurance to pay out.

I think she knows one or both of the boys from the neighborhood and knew with their troublemaking that no one would question her accusations.
She keeps submitting to interviews to get people to believe her and instead she incriminates herself more each time.
How is anyone seriously buying this story?
I don't think the reporters or even her own family do.

except there was an eye witness nother older woman that had called 911 and said they shot the baby. nice try white guilt libtard . Way to defend the baby killers

As I said I did not read the details of this matter. So tell me what was the reason the person wanted to shoot a baby? I hear the word robbery. Not being funny at all but they were robbing a baby or mother, or what the hell is their "story".

I think she did it. The cops have yet to disclose what evidence, if any, they have found on the boys. They did residue tests on the Mother and Father and there was nothing. Did they do residue test on the boys? Further, the Mother being shot and in close range when the baby was shot would have had powder residue on her, yet there was none. The baby was shot somewhere else and already dead as she pushed him down the street. I just don't buy into this story. Further, who puts life ins on a baby. The purpose of life insurance is so that there is something to support the family should the bread winner(s) die.

I think she did it. The cops have yet to disclose what evidence, if any, they have found on the boys. They did residue tests on the Mother and Father and there was nothing. Did they do residue test on the boys? Further, the Mother being shot and in close range when the baby was shot would have had powder residue on her, yet there was none. The baby was shot somewhere else and already dead as she pushed him down the street. I just don't buy into this story. Further, who puts life ins on a baby. The purpose of life insurance is so that there is something to support the family should the bread winner(s) die.

the lie is that youre an idiot.

Check out this weird 911 call. What's wrong with it?

Something is really fishy about the whole thing.
Found another full interview where she goes on and on about unnecessary details. She's been giving interviews from the very first few hours and packing up his stuff, getting ready to move. They found a gun, guess we'll see pretty soon. Sounds like a circus of "witnesses" came forward once there was a reward, all of them blaming each other for taking part. It's a weird, strange story where pretty much everyone involved seems to be lying about something or other.
Even if she didn't do it, she LOVES the attention, LOVES it.
[link to www.washingtonpost.com]