"sad picture" - it REALLY is a sad picture ! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 01:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | near the bleachers and finish line, where the bomb was placed right next to the building, and the window blown out. why did the window blow "out" and not "in". [link to i.imgur.com] |
AncientDust
User ID: 527296 United States 04/21/2013 01:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 38066691 I hope someone answers you with better photos than the ones above... the 2 imgur photos above show Bombing location 1, by the finish line, with all the flags and scaffolding. This is where the now famous guy lost his legs and where Krystal passed away. I am also pretty sure this is also where the burn next to the building is- someone correct me if that is not right. It can be hard to tell because of the way the photo is taken. The little boy was the only death at bombing location number 2, further up from the finish line, that happened 12 seconds later. That location has the tree behind the barrier and there are no flags and the kids were standing on the barrier. that's consistent with what i said. thank you. No, this isn't right. The boy was suppose to have been at the finish line per 3 different news reports and quoting the father. This is what is confusing. At the second site, there is another little boy, but I don't think that is suppose to the be boy who lost his life. See where there is getting confusing? there is one photograph that is circulating that has the little boy's head circled, an arrow pointing to the backpack bomb, and showing the green postal box, and that location is in from of the Forum Restaurant (no flags), and not the "Finish Line Grandstand" location with flags. and the photo says the little boy in the photo died. ( But somehow, the girl in the shorts standing right next to the little boy not only lived but has no injuries as she is running away after the bombing? WTH? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 02:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No, this isn't right. The boy was suppose to have been at the finish line per 3 different news reports and quoting the father. This is what is confusing. At the second site, there is another little boy, but I don't think that is suppose to the be boy who lost his life. See where there is getting confusing? there is one photograph that is circulating that has the little boy's head circled, an arrow pointing to the backpack bomb, and showing the green postal box, and that location is in from of the Forum Restaurant (no flags), and not the "Finish Line Grandstand" location with flags. and the photo says the little boy in the photo died. ( But somehow, the girl in the shorts standing right next to the little boy not only lived but has no injuries as she is running away after the bombing? WTH? yes i distinctly remember reading an article which said: the little boy was killed, and that little girl (his sister) lost a leg, and their mother was injured also. (so, that article would be another source that supports the photo) |
Bilbo Baggins
User ID: 36054571 United States 04/21/2013 02:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they are manipulating the public, Quoting: Doomina right "in your face" with your emotions, and even GLPers fell for it on the "sad picture" thread. so this picture really is a sad picture - because that is its purpose. look in the red circle. the metal from the barrier is thinner in the circled area, and the girls are "translucent" if the bag is visible there ! the bomb exploded approx. 5 meters from the bag circled - more to the back, where the house is - there´s enough pictures showing the blackened ground ! this pic is only out there to manipulate you and your emotions - it is not showing "truth" ! use your brain. [link to www.washingtontimes.com] . [link to s1222.photobucket.com] check this stupid thing i just fucked with. there's some object that looks like it's cut, in half with photo editing, and the girls leg is passing right through the fucking fence... Edit* The only thing I did to that image was add 2 circles and wrote on it. Look at the image from the link... Last Edited by Deplorable_Pepe on 04/21/2013 02:14 AM |
AncientDust
User ID: 527296 United States 04/21/2013 02:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: whiteangel No, this isn't right. The boy was suppose to have been at the finish line per 3 different news reports and quoting the father. This is what is confusing. At the second site, there is another little boy, but I don't think that is suppose to the be boy who lost his life. See where there is getting confusing? there is one photograph that is circulating that has the little boy's head circled, an arrow pointing to the backpack bomb, and showing the green postal box, and that location is in from of the Forum Restaurant (no flags), and not the "Finish Line Grandstand" location with flags. and the photo says the little boy in the photo died. ( But somehow, the girl in the shorts standing right next to the little boy not only lived but has no injuries as she is running away after the bombing? WTH? yes i distinctly remember reading an article which said: the little boy was killed, and that little girl (his sister) lost a leg, and their mother was injured also. (so, that article would be another source that supports the photo) No, it is not a little girl standing next to him. And the girl HAS NO injuries! She looks fine. If she was right next to the little boy, how can that be? Wait, I'll find the photos. |
Listen_n
User ID: 1580156 United States 04/21/2013 02:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they are manipulating the public, Quoting: Doomina right "in your face" with your emotions, and even GLPers fell for it on the "sad picture" thread. so this picture really is a sad picture - because that is its purpose. look in the red circle. the metal from the barrier is thinner in the circled area, and the girls are "translucent" if the bag is visible there ! the bomb exploded approx. 5 meters from the bag circled - more to the back, where the house is - there´s enough pictures showing the blackened ground ! this pic is only out there to manipulate you and your emotions - it is not showing "truth" ! use your brain. [link to www.washingtontimes.com] . check this shit out Watch the guys hip right before it's over the "gore"....it's a FLAG blowing away. LOL It took me a few times watching it to see it. Tripped me out at first too. Last Edited by Listen_n on 04/21/2013 02:23 AM If we don't listen we will never hear the truth |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 02:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | they are manipulating the public, Quoting: Doomina right "in your face" with your emotions, and even GLPers fell for it on the "sad picture" thread. so this picture really is a sad picture - because that is its purpose. look in the red circle. the metal from the barrier is thinner in the circled area, and the girls are "translucent" if the bag is visible there ! the bomb exploded approx. 5 meters from the bag circled - more to the back, where the house is - there´s enough pictures showing the blackened ground ! this pic is only out there to manipulate you and your emotions - it is not showing "truth" ! use your brain. [link to www.washingtontimes.com] . [link to s1222.photobucket.com] check this stupid thing i just fucked with. there's some object that looks like it's cut, in half with photo editing, and the girls leg is passing right through the fucking fence... Edit* The only thing I did to that image was add 2 circles and wrote on it. Look at the image from the link... well you are half right. first, the girls leg in NOT going through the fucking fence. that is only her knee barely fitting through (and it was probably just a comfortable position for her) as for the "cut thing": i vaguely remember seeing a version of this photo where the kid-bomber's brother was walking in front of him right where that so-called "cut area" is. so you may be on to something BUT I'M NOT CERTAIN. |
AncientDust
User ID: 527296 United States 04/21/2013 02:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OK, so in the firt image, look by the fence, not the little girl but the one on the other side in shorts and sunglasses. Look at her socks and shoes and her shorts. She is right next to the little boy who lost his life. [link to i.imgur.com] Then look in the middle of the road in this one. It's the same girl, I am sure of it! But how can that be? [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] |
Louve
User ID: 38596003 United States 04/21/2013 02:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The shadow in the "Sad picture" is also off. In other photos, you can see that it was a pretty bright day out and the sun was at the runner's backs as they ran towards the finish line. In this photo though, there is only a nice, rectangular photo under the crowd of watchers. The gap between the two girls (where you can see the bag) also appears to be off. Further up, their shoulders are almost touching, same with their feet, yet there's a fairly wide gap near their knees. Somewhere near their waists, it appears that the photo has been altered...in my opinion. Last Edited by Louve on 04/21/2013 02:35 AM "Standing on a hill in my mountain of dreams, Telling myself it's not as hard, hard, hard as it seems." "see, that's there we differ. you can learn a lot more in the journey than in the destination." ~eekers "Benghazi. We remembered you". ~JypsieWind |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 02:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OK, so in the firt image, look by the fence, not the little girl but the one on the other side in shorts and sunglasses. Quoting: AncientDust Look at her socks and shoes and her shorts. She is right next to the little boy who lost his life. [link to i.imgur.com] Then look in the middle of the road in this one. It's the same girl, I am sure of it! But how can that be? [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] i know which girl: the girl with the bare leg (in blue). and that is only he knee cap sticking through the gap in the fence (we've all done that before, ourselves) as for the girl running (in blue) yes that very well may be the same girl. and it looks like she is running like a scared jackrabbit, so when the bomb exploded she obviously was very very lucky and didn't get hit by any shrapnel. anything else? |
Listen_n
User ID: 1580156 United States 04/21/2013 02:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OK, so in the firt image, look by the fence, not the little girl but the one on the other side in shorts and sunglasses. Quoting: AncientDust Look at her socks and shoes and her shorts. She is right next to the little boy who lost his life. [link to i.imgur.com] Then look in the middle of the road in this one. It's the same girl, I am sure of it! But how can that be? [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] Oh good catch! Yeah, that's definitely the same girl. You can see the white on the side of her shorts when she's running too. Just barely. Same sunglasses and face structure. She was running after the bomb went off right? Doesn't look like she was in the RACE tho wearing that sweatshirt. Last Edited by Listen_n on 04/21/2013 02:39 AM If we don't listen we will never hear the truth |
AncientDust
User ID: 527296 United States 04/21/2013 02:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OK, so in the firt image, look by the fence, not the little girl but the one on the other side in shorts and sunglasses. Quoting: AncientDust Look at her socks and shoes and her shorts. She is right next to the little boy who lost his life. [link to i.imgur.com] Then look in the middle of the road in this one. It's the same girl, I am sure of it! But how can that be? [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] i know which girl: the girl with the bare leg (in blue). and that is only he knee cap sticking through the gap in the fence (we've all done that before, ourselves) as for the girl running (in blue) yes that very well may be the same girl. and it looks like she is running like a scared jackrabbit, so when the bomb exploded she obviously was very very lucky and didn't get hit by any shrapnel. anything else? BS! She is closer to the "backpack" than the kid? She should be in bad shape if he is dead and his sister lost her leg? Why isn't she hurt? |
AncientDust
User ID: 527296 United States 04/21/2013 02:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OK, so in the firt image, look by the fence, not the little girl but the one on the other side in shorts and sunglasses. Quoting: AncientDust Look at her socks and shoes and her shorts. She is right next to the little boy who lost his life. [link to i.imgur.com] Then look in the middle of the road in this one. It's the same girl, I am sure of it! But how can that be? [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] Oh good catch! Yeah, that's definitely the same girl. You can see the white on the side of her shorts when she's running too. Just barely. Same sunglasses and face structure. Someone else brought this up in the backpack thread and it really doesn't add up. She is closest to the "backpack". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 02:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OK, so in the firt image, look by the fence, not the little girl but the one on the other side in shorts and sunglasses. Quoting: AncientDust Look at her socks and shoes and her shorts. She is right next to the little boy who lost his life. [link to i.imgur.com] Then look in the middle of the road in this one. It's the same girl, I am sure of it! But how can that be? [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] i know which girl: the girl with the bare leg (in blue). and that is only he knee cap sticking through the gap in the fence (we've all done that before, ourselves) as for the girl running (in blue) yes that very well may be the same girl. and it looks like she is running like a scared jackrabbit, so when the bomb exploded she obviously was very very lucky and didn't get hit by any shrapnel. anything else? BS! She is closer to the "backpack" than the kid? She should be in bad shape if he is dead and his sister lost her leg? Why isn't she hurt? well, look again. it sure as hell looks to me like she was just very, very, very lucky, and that's why she is running like a scared jackrabbit :) |
Listen_n
User ID: 1580156 United States 04/21/2013 02:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Every time I look at that picture I can't seem to make out a back pack. I see it as being in front of the girl standing close to the other chic. Whatever it is. I see the girl with the knee against the fence. The girl next to her has on Nikes. The girl next to HER has on Nikes too and that appears to be her left leg. With the way she's facing and basically pressed up closer to the other Nike chic, it would seem her right leg would be closing that other space...if that makes sense. If we don't listen we will never hear the truth |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 02:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | OK, so in the firt image, look by the fence, not the little girl but the one on the other side in shorts and sunglasses. Quoting: AncientDust Look at her socks and shoes and her shorts. She is right next to the little boy who lost his life. [link to i.imgur.com] Then look in the middle of the road in this one. It's the same girl, I am sure of it! But how can that be? [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] i know which girl: the girl with the bare leg (in blue). and that is only he knee cap sticking through the gap in the fence (we've all done that before, ourselves) as for the girl running (in blue) yes that very well may be the same girl. and it looks like she is running like a scared jackrabbit, so when the bomb exploded she obviously was very very lucky and didn't get hit by any shrapnel. anything else? BS! She is closer to the "backpack" than the kid? She should be in bad shape if he is dead and his sister lost her leg? Why isn't she hurt? well, look again. it sure as hell looks to me like she was just very, very, very lucky, and that's why she is running like a scared jackrabbit :) but, i just looked again. and it is more evident that that gal with her knee through the fence is those 2 kids mother. and the article i read said the boy was killed, the girl lost a leg, and the mother was injured. so, the jackrabbit girl would not be the same one, in that case. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 02:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | well, it's there.. it is right behind the girl to the left of the girl with her knee through the fence, down where the ground should be. it is black with white stripes. and i guess everyone says that is the backpack because evidently it has been established that that is the spot where the bomb went off. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 02:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AncientDust
User ID: 527296 United States 04/21/2013 02:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 38488245 i know which girl: the girl with the bare leg (in blue). and that is only he knee cap sticking through the gap in the fence (we've all done that before, ourselves) as for the girl running (in blue) yes that very well may be the same girl. and it looks like she is running like a scared jackrabbit, so when the bomb exploded she obviously was very very lucky and didn't get hit by any shrapnel. anything else? BS! She is closer to the "backpack" than the kid? She should be in bad shape if he is dead and his sister lost her leg? Why isn't she hurt? well, look again. it sure as hell looks to me like she was just very, very, very lucky, and that's why she is running like a scared jackrabbit :) but, i just looked again. and it is more evident that that gal with her knee through the fence is those 2 kids mother. and the article i read said the boy was killed, the girl lost a leg, and the mother was injured. so, the jackrabbit girl would not be the same one, in that case. It's the same girl, same sunglasses, same shoes, same shorts! I can't imagine she would have started running until AFTER the bomb went off? Something is wrong with the whole story! It wasn't that brothers pack or that woman would be hurt, bad! She is standing at ground zero! |
AncientDust
User ID: 527296 United States 04/21/2013 02:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 02:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: AncientDust BS! She is closer to the "backpack" than the kid? She should be in bad shape if he is dead and his sister lost her leg? Why isn't she hurt? well, look again. it sure as hell looks to me like she was just very, very, very lucky, and that's why she is running like a scared jackrabbit :) but, i just looked again. and it is more evident that that gal with her knee through the fence is those 2 kids mother. and the article i read said the boy was killed, the girl lost a leg, and the mother was injured. so, the jackrabbit girl would not be the same one, in that case. It's the same girl, same sunglasses, same shoes, same shorts! I can't imagine she would have started running until AFTER the bomb went off? she sure as hell would have taken off running if she was in shock and not injured. but, if what you are saying is correct, then where is the 2 kids' mother? and if the jackrabbit girl is the same, and the article says the mother was injured, then as you say: then, yes, there is some kind of conspiracy going on. |
AncientDust
User ID: 527296 United States 04/21/2013 03:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 38488245 well, look again. it sure as hell looks to me like she was just very, very, very lucky, and that's why she is running like a scared jackrabbit :) but, i just looked again. and it is more evident that that gal with her knee through the fence is those 2 kids mother. and the article i read said the boy was killed, the girl lost a leg, and the mother was injured. so, the jackrabbit girl would not be the same one, in that case. It's the same girl, same sunglasses, same shoes, same shorts! I can't imagine she would have started running until AFTER the bomb went off? she sure as hell would have taken off running if she was in shock and not injured. but, if what you are saying is correct, then where is the 2 kids' mother? and if the jackrabbit girl is the same, and the article says the mother was injured, then as you say: then, yes, there is some kind of conspiracy going on. If that backpack blew up moments after that photo, that girl would HAVE to be hurt. I won't assume she is the kids mother, as just because she is standing next to the kids means nothing. It could be there was only room left at the barrier for good viewing for the kids, and the Mom is farther behind them. There is just no way if THAT backpack blew that this girl RIGHT NEXT to it wouldn't be injured. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 03:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | DAMN IT! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 38488245 the girl with her knee through the fence: just to that girl's left there is a girl, and behind THAT girl is the backpack Simmer down. I see the pack, but it can't be the one that exploided or the girl in the shorts would be messed up. well, the article i read said that the 2 kids' mother was injured (that might mean "mess up"?). and i think that the girl with her knee through the fence is the kids mother. now, there are also 2 girls to the "knee girl's" left: and they may or may not have gotten whacked. |
Farrrrrout
User ID: 38591021 Australia 04/21/2013 03:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | DAMN IT! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 38488245 the girl with her knee through the fence: just to that girl's left there is a girl, and behind THAT girl is the backpack Simmer down. I see the pack, but it can't be the one that exploided or the girl in the shorts would be messed up. well, the article i read said that the 2 kids' mother was injured (that might mean "mess up"?). and i think that the girl with her knee through the fence is the kids mother. now, there are also 2 girls to the "knee girl's" left: and they may or may not have gotten whacked. No way that is the kids mother, she's too young, i'd say mid teens(ish) around 15-18 yoa. Farrrrrout - Creator of the "Dicksqisitive" moniker. THE CORPORATION THANKS YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 03:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | DAMN IT! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 38488245 the girl with her knee through the fence: just to that girl's left there is a girl, and behind THAT girl is the backpack Simmer down. I see the pack, but it can't be the one that exploided or the girl in the shorts would be messed up. well, the article i read said that the 2 kids' mother was injured (that might mean "mess up"?). and i think that the girl with her knee through the fence is the kids mother. now, there are also 2 girls to the "knee girl's" left: and they may or may not have gotten whacked. No way that is the kids mother, she's too young, i'd say mid teens(ish) around 15-18 yoa. o.k. perhaps. but where else is the kids' mother? what mother is going to leave her kids alone in a crowd of thousands. but, if that's not their mother then all of you and that other guy's speculations might be correct. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38488245 United States 04/21/2013 03:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
AncientDust
User ID: 527296 United States 04/21/2013 09:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | DAMN IT! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 38488245 the girl with her knee through the fence: just to that girl's left there is a girl, and behind THAT girl is the backpack Simmer down. I see the pack, but it can't be the one that exploided or the girl in the shorts would be messed up. well, the article i read said that the 2 kids' mother was injured (that might mean "mess up"?). and i think that the girl with her knee through the fence is the kids mother. now, there are also 2 girls to the "knee girl's" left: and they may or may not have gotten whacked. No way that is the kids mother, she's too young, i'd say mid teens(ish) around 15-18 yoa. Whether she is the kids mother or not is irrelevant. What is imortant is that she is unhurt, when they would have us believe she is standing right next to the pack moments before it was suppose to have blown up and killed that kid. Proof that it couldn't have happened that way. |
AncientDust
User ID: 527296 United States 04/21/2013 09:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Doomina
(OP) User ID: 38536001 Germany 04/21/2013 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Doomina
(OP) User ID: 38536001 Germany 04/21/2013 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |