summary about strange coincidences and unanswered questions regarding the Boston Bombings | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31827706 United States 04/21/2013 06:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is the woman who was standing right next to the kid who was killed not even have an injury when she was closer the 19 years olds backpack then the kid? Quoting: AncientDust [link to i.imgur.com] Woman in the road in this shot. [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] How can you verify that was the girl? The one with the tufts sweatshirt on? It took me a min to figure out which was the girl in each pic. So the one standing next to the boy, then the one running hair pulled back, tufts sweatshirt? Looks like hair is down in one pic and up in the other. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24547360 United States 04/21/2013 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No. 25 The missing man who was carjacked. Why did they not kill him? Why did they tell him about themselves? Why were they at MIT? Why did the FBI have to ask the public to identify the suspects when it apparently had been contacted at least two times to investigate the older brother? Who killed the older brother's friend? How did the family have so much money to keep flying back and forth to Central Asia? Why does the blown up backpack not match the backpack that we can see carried by the brothers? What's up with the Saudi dude? Were FBI officials carrying detonation cord from his apartment in that DailyMail photo? Was there or wasn't there a drill going on that day? Did the Saudi dude know either of the brothers? Were tracking dogs used? Why or why not? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38518890 United States 04/21/2013 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why did this other poster in another thread (see thread linked below) who lives 20 minutes north of Boston hear what was obviously an explosion last Monday TWO HOURS before the twin blasts that went off at the finish line of the Boston Marathon? Thread: Lockdown in Boston Similar to WMD Response Plans Was this the "controlled explosion" that was part of the mass casualty drill that was being conducted in the Boston area that day? If so, why is the government now denying that such a drill was in progress that day? If not, what the heck was this "early" explosion? It should not have been the explosion at the JFK Library because that one supoosedly went off almost simultaneously with the first blast that occurred at the Marathon. No matter what the answers are to the above questions, it is clear that there were at keast FOUR (not 3) explosions the day of the marathon bombings. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16482644 Australia 04/21/2013 06:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is the woman who was standing right next to the kid who was killed not even have an injury when she was closer the 19 years olds backpack then the kid? Quoting: AncientDust [link to i.imgur.com] Woman in the road in this shot. [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] How can you verify that was the girl? The one with the tufts sweatshirt on? It took me a min to figure out which was the girl in each pic. So the one standing next to the boy, then the one running hair pulled back, tufts sweatshirt? Looks like hair is down in one pic and up in the other. Look at the mans feet second from her right.. how does that happen? bent knees both and feet off the ground. I cant make a sense of it at all other than to say this photo is suspect. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38632858 United Kingdom 04/21/2013 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Firsr we were told they robbed a 7/11. Only after the store manager said it wasnt them that the cops came clean about it. Cops said they highjacked a mercedes and they told the driver they were the bombers. Now only after a garage mechanic told the media that the brothers owned a mercedes the media have come out and said one brother was in the merc and the other was in a different stolen car |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32822335 United States 04/21/2013 06:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is the woman who was standing right next to the kid who was killed not even have an injury when she was closer the 19 years olds backpack then the kid? Quoting: AncientDust [link to i.imgur.com] Woman in the road in this shot. [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] GOOD FIND!! IT IS her! The clincher is not the bare legs. It IS the SOCKS. Cool... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2492634 United Kingdom 04/21/2013 06:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How can you verify that was the girl? The one with the tufts sweatshirt on? It took me a min to figure out which was the girl in each pic. So the one standing next to the boy, then the one running hair pulled back, tufts sweatshirt? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31827706 Looks like hair is down in one pic and up in the other. She stands out way to much in the second picture compared to the people behind her. She has identical clothing - blue hoodie, black shorts with the white logo on the left leg, blue and white hooped socks and white shoes with the black stripe pointing towards the toe, sun glasses and the same build. Her hair is bouncing has she jogs away from the scene. In the first image the top of the F and T from the word TUFTS can be seen above her left arm and the C from the word LACIOSSE can be seen behind the railing she is leaning on. What ever happened, she appears to have made an extremely lucky decision to move away from the area. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16482644 Australia 04/21/2013 06:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is the woman who was standing right next to the kid who was killed not even have an injury when she was closer the 19 years olds backpack then the kid? Quoting: AncientDust [link to i.imgur.com] Woman in the road in this shot. [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] GOOD FIND!! IT IS her! The clincher is not the bare legs. It IS the SOCKS. Cool... she seems to have white shorts on in the first photo, did she change them? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32822335 United States 04/21/2013 06:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is the woman who was standing right next to the kid who was killed not even have an injury when she was closer the 19 years olds backpack then the kid? Quoting: AncientDust [link to i.imgur.com] Woman in the road in this shot. [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] How can you verify that was the girl? The one with the tufts sweatshirt on? It took me a min to figure out which was the girl in each pic. So the one standing next to the boy, then the one running hair pulled back, tufts sweatshirt? Looks like hair is down in one pic and up in the other. It's the SOCKS, dummy. If you LACK observational talent or intelligence, just stay on the sidelines, will you? |
anok User ID: 20972388 Ireland 04/21/2013 07:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is the woman who was standing right next to the kid who was killed not even have an injury when she was closer the 19 years olds backpack then the kid? Quoting: AncientDust [link to i.imgur.com] Woman in the road in this shot. [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] GOOD FIND!! IT IS her! The clincher is not the bare legs. It IS the SOCKS. Cool... she seems to have white shorts on in the first photo, did she change them? not white shorts -navy with a white stripe around the sides-you can see it in the second photo if you look closely |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38632858 United Kingdom 04/21/2013 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is the woman who was standing right next to the kid who was killed not even have an injury when she was closer the 19 years olds backpack then the kid? Quoting: AncientDust [link to i.imgur.com] Woman in the road in this shot. [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] GOOD FIND!! IT IS her! The clincher is not the bare legs. It IS the SOCKS. Cool... she seems to have white shorts on in the first photo, did she change them? You colour blind? Both pictures are blue/black shorts white trim on the side |
anok User ID: 20972388 Ireland 04/21/2013 07:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2492634 United Kingdom 04/21/2013 07:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | she seems to have white shorts on in the first photo, did she change them? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16482644 She has black shorts that have a white stripe down the left side. The white stripe curves slightly inward at the very bottom of the shorts which is clearly visible in the first image. If you zoom into the second image you can also see that the white stripe while hidden from direct view is also curving inward at the very bottom. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32822335 United States 04/21/2013 07:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is the woman who was standing right next to the kid who was killed not even have an injury when she was closer the 19 years olds backpack then the kid? Quoting: AncientDust [link to i.imgur.com] Woman in the road in this shot. [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] GOOD FIND!! IT IS her! The clincher is not the bare legs. It IS the SOCKS. Cool... she seems to have white shorts on in the first photo, did she change them? I see no white shorts, the pic is too fuzzy. I see an untanned thigh. |
anok User ID: 20972388 Ireland 04/21/2013 07:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16482644 Australia 04/21/2013 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why is the woman who was standing right next to the kid who was killed not even have an injury when she was closer the 19 years olds backpack then the kid? Quoting: AncientDust [link to i.imgur.com] Woman in the road in this shot. [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] GOOD FIND!! IT IS her! The clincher is not the bare legs. It IS the SOCKS. Cool... she seems to have white shorts on in the first photo, did she change them? You colour blind? Both pictures are blue/black shorts white trim on the side are u a shill? clearly, there is a wide white band on her left thigh in the first photo not visible on the second. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32822335 United States 04/21/2013 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | she seems to have white shorts on in the first photo, did she change them? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16482644 She has black shorts that have a white stripe down the left side. The white stripe curves slightly inward at the very bottom of the shorts which is clearly visible in the first image. If you zoom into the second image you can also see that the white stripe while hidden from direct view is also curving inward at the very bottom. Good explanation; makes perfect sense. Anyway, the socks are way too unique TOGETHER with all the OTHER matching parts for not to be the SAME girl. (Occam's razor) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38632858 United Kingdom 04/21/2013 07:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32822335 GOOD FIND!! IT IS her! The clincher is not the bare legs. It IS the SOCKS. Cool... she seems to have white shorts on in the first photo, did she change them? You colour blind? Both pictures are blue/black shorts white trim on the side are u a shill? clearly, there is a wide white band on her left thigh in the first photo not visible on the second. Thought so. You are colour blind. The white strip is easily seen on the second pic. Zoom in, idiot |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16482644 Australia 04/21/2013 07:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16482644 Australia 04/21/2013 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38632858 United Kingdom 04/21/2013 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh I was looking for that site! She does say exactly that at approximately minute 1:30 allI can say is WOW! lmao. So it was the cops that ran him over not the brother Why do they need to lie about it? No big deal if they said they did it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12204182 United States 04/21/2013 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don't forget about the cell phone service disruption after the explosions. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 38627127 I know some people who live in Boston and we told them their cell phones aren't gonna work. And they were like why? Some people just live under a rock they probably didn't even know shit was going on. My neighbors never act like anything is happening is this world. Wake the fuck up people! Nothing will wake up some people in Boston and Massachusetts. Everyone around here was like I can't believe this is going on right now. Well it fucking is, get use to it too. There are more of these people out there. |
anok User ID: 20972388 Ireland 04/21/2013 07:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | regarding this girl running i reckon these were either her friends or the other girls standing with her at the scene,especially the girl on the screens left. could explain how fit she looks and her top. [link to www.laxmagazine.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2492634 United Kingdom 04/21/2013 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | good try shills but common sense must prevail over levitating feet. back to the same ole photoshop tricks Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16482644 Sorry I am not sure who you are directing this to or what point you are trying to make but someone appearing to be levitating in a photo capture of an event like this can be explained by the person being caught in mid jump when trying to locate someone they are with who has been lost somewhere further back in the mass effort to get away from the blast. I think its a reasonable explanation compared to it being a photoshop trick. Similar with the woman in the under armour hoodie directly in front of the white cap suspect who also appears to be hovering. It is scientifically proven that when running a lot of people have both feet of the ground when in mid stride. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31864454 United States 04/21/2013 07:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32822335 United States 04/21/2013 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | architectural My thoughts exactly. I have some experience in the architectural commercial glass business. There is another anomaly; there is a pic where pieces and large shards of glass are on the sidewalk. Two problems with this: 1. For over 40 years (may be longer) tempered glass is mandatory within three feet (last 15 years upped to 5') of walking areas - both interior and exterior. (Temp'd glass breaks into tiny pieces). Here comes the rub: Why that galss on the sidewalk is OBVIOUSLY annealed (plate) glass? 2. Why is the glass outside on the sidewalk rather than inside? The blast's airpressure would have pushed that glasspane inside. There is a technical explanation for negative air pressure (pulling the glass), but that implies a VERY LOW LEVEL airpressure explosion, nothing more than high speed windgust, traveling in front of the glass (parallel) in the 70-100mph range. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16482644 Australia 04/21/2013 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | good try shills but common sense must prevail over levitating feet. back to the same ole photoshop tricks Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16482644 Sorry I am not sure who you are directing this to or what point you are trying to make but someone appearing to be levitating in a photo capture of an event like this can be explained by the person being caught in mid jump when trying to locate someone they are with who has been lost somewhere further back in the mass effort to get away from the blast. I think its a reasonable explanation compared to it being a photoshop trick. Similar with the woman in the under armour hoodie directly in front of the white cap suspect who also appears to be hovering. It is scientifically proven that when running a lot of people have both feet of the ground when in mid stride. i'm not going to argue about it, he's got no reason to jump with a fairly clear view around him, and if he did, an effort has been made and suceeded in making all those faces unrecognizable apart from the foreground persons, which i'm sure was the aim of this photograph. You have a nice day. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32822335 United States 04/21/2013 07:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
anok User ID: 20972388 Ireland 04/21/2013 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
test User ID: 34946760 France 04/21/2013 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Okay Maybe a Big Deal, [link to graphics8.nytimes.com] the girl not injury in front of bomb is to me very similar to Katherine Russell (girlfriend of the older bro) 1st she's sexy as fuck 2nd Same legs color/tone: [link to sandrarose.com] 3nd Maybe same shade: [link to i.dailymail.co.uk] 4nd Same nose: [link to i.dailymail.co.uk] 5nd(look similar to the scene here, third from right on the back row) [link to i.dailymail.co.uk] 6nd( logo on the sweatshirt, is from a near university pretty usual/normal) 7nd Guess what? she's leave the state: [link to www.dailymail.co.uk] nice actor? |