Any hard evidence for chemtrails yet?

I think it was in third grade that I learned about cloud formation, but I'd read it on my own before that. Clouds are condensed water vapor, contrails are mainly hot water vapor which rapidly cools... Not that hard to figure out.

Hey all, haven't been on much lately. I was just wondering if anybody has taken a direct sample from a "chemtrail" yet and seen what it's really made of, or if the whole thing is still a bunch of speculative BS that ignores Occam's Razor. Thanks!

Why do you use Netanyahoo's silhouette for your av?

still with the disinfo. lol Failure to understand we know what they are here for.

Hey all, haven't been on much lately. I was just wondering if anybody has taken a direct sample from a "chemtrail" yet and seen what it's really made of, or if the whole thing is still a bunch of speculative BS that ignores Occam's Razor. Thanks!

Um, none of that looks like "chemtrails." So, what are those links supposed to be evidence of?

Just because a sockpuppet obsessed chemtard calls what I post "disinfo", doesn't mean it's so.

And just because a chemtard believes he/she "knows" something...doesn't mean he/she isn't just paranoid and confused.

You chemtards have failed to prove a single trailing the sky is anything more than a contrail. And you will continue to fail. I'm sure you're used to being a failure by now...if not, I'm sure you'll get used to it. What choice do you have?!

1) Go check out their web site.
2) Click "Employee Login" or whatever it says.
3) Read the disclaimer.
4) Enjoy your complementary tracking device!

:chempark: There are plenty of reports on the internet, but you of course pretend otherwise.

[link to www.geoengineeringwatch.org]

Patents.

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

[link to geoengineeringwatch.nature4less.com]

I can go on.....

The way I see it, the issue has been hijacked by those who categorically deny that any form of spraying exists, it does exist but not every contrail is or ever will be a chem trail.

It reminds me of people who push the crisis actor agenda, take over the debate and obfuscate with bullshit to hide the truth.

You're lying. There are NO reports of DIRECT SAMPLES.

Your retort is hilarious . Just acknowledging what you are.

Duh, the script give you away. LOL

[link to www.geoengineeringwatch.org]

Patents.

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

[link to patft.uspto.gov]

[link to geoengineeringwatch.nature4less.com]

I can go on.....

The way I see it, the issue has been hijacked by those who categorically deny that any form of spraying exists, it does exist but not every contrail is or ever will be a chem trail.

It reminds me of people who push the crisis actor agenda, take over the debate and obfuscate with bullshit to hide the truth.

There are plenty of reports on the internet, but you of course pretend otherwise.

The basic assumption of chemtrail belief is that jet engine exhaust (water vapor and particulates) can't form clouds (water vapor condensed around particulates).

No it isn't.

This is a plain, basic example of a strawman argument. I can't believe a logical person such as yourself would sink to such a tactic.

history repeats ya?

[link to enenews.com]


Humans Used for Radiation Experiments: A Shameful Chapter in US History

[...] The military even dumped radiation from planes and spread it across wide areas around and downwind of Oak Ridge, Tenn., Los Alamos, NM, and Dugway, Utah.[/color] This “systematic radiation warfare program,” conducted between 1944 and 1961, was kept secret for decades.[/b]

[link to www.geoengineeringwatch.org]

Where?

You mean this?

[link to www.geoengineeringwatch.org]

Contrails lol... ok sure.

No it isn't.

This is a plain, basic example of a strawman argument. I can't believe a logical person such as yourself would sink to such a tactic.

Really? Then what is the basis of chemtrail belief?

What does that have to do with proving that trails in the sky are anything other than normal contrails?