There is no one in charge.

Sounds right to me, I see things in that kind of way as well. Good thread!

I have often said that the true conspiracy is to hide the fact that no one knows what the hell is really going on.

X

535

Got some more knowledge for me?

we live in a computer simulation

and one control its all

and one controls it all

well fuck u

That is because they won't let the winner be in charge.

:makesandwich:

the only winners are cheaters - which isnt winning.

The ones who never win are the accusers.

Forgot something.

and the ones that cheat are the ones that cheat

I'm in charge of myself. Master of self.

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Were it so easy, you know that isn't the truth.

i dont know what anyone is talking about or who anyone is

youre assuming its easy to tell them apart

oh now thats a burn!
i love the smell of napalm in the afternoon!
claps with enthusiasm!

In Charge -

'Electric charge is the physical property of matter that causes it to experience a force when placed in an electromagnetic field. Electric charge is the physical property of matter that causes it to experience a force when placed in an electromagnetic field.'

We lizard people run everything!

We gave you fukin Netflix!


Just accept your fate, human.

doesnt matter whos in charge,its who wins.if the game is to cheat then cheating is fair.
even the greatest cheaters can be brought low.
its that one trip or one thread pulled.the perfect sentence mailed to just the right person.the spark.then it all goes sideways.
it worked on 911.
it doesnt even have to be aimed at chaos.its the butterfly effect that cascades into a form of your choosing.precognitive view of an acts consequences.it only takes one act.
at its perfection.
usually requires more than one act though to make a difference with an outcome of your definition of the win.

No one in charge??? …give me a break.

There will be many accountable for this mess they have created.

…and the word "untouchable" will be a thing of our past!!


Cheers, Uncle hexy

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

....."double-goer") is a non-biologically related look-alike or double






[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]


The W and Z bosons are together known as the weak or more generally as the intermediate vector bosons.



[link to webcache.googleusercontent.com]





Possible new particle hints that universe may not be left-handed


By Michael Slezak

Mirroring the universe (Image:
/
.
n particular, W bosons, which carry the weak nuclear force, are supposed to come only in left-handed varieties. The debris from smashing protons at the LHC has revealed evidence of unexpected right-handed bosons.

After finding the Higgs boson in 2012, the collider shut down for upgrades, allowing collisions to resume at higher energies earlier this year. At two of the LHC’s experiments, the latest results appear to contain four novel signals. Together, they could hint at a W-boson-like particle, the W’, with a mass of about 2 teraelectronvolts. If confirmed, it would be the first boson discovered since the Higgs.

The find could reveal how to extend the successful but frustratingly incomplete standard model of particle physics, in ways that could explain the nature of dark matter and why there is so little antimatter in the universe.

The strongest signal is an excess of particles seen by the ATLAS experiment (arxiv.org/abs/1506.00962), at a statistical significance of 3.4 sigma. This falls short of the 5 sigma regarded as proof of existence (see “Particle-spotting at the LHC“), but physicists are intrigued because three other unexpected signals at the independent CMS experiment could point to the same thing.

“




The big question is whether there might be some connection between these,” says Bogdan Dobrescu at Fermilab in Chicago. In a paper posted online last month, Dobrescu and Zhen Liu, also at Fermilab, showed how the signals could fit naturally into modified versions of left-right symmetric models (arxiv.org/abs/1507.01923). They restore left-right symmetry by introducing a suite of exotic particles, of which this possible W’ particle is one.

Another way to fit the right-handed W’ into a bigger theory was proposed last week by Bhupal Dev at the University of Manchester, UK, and Rabindra Mohapatra at the University of Maryland. They invoke just a few novel particles, then restore left-right symmetry by giving just one of them special properties (arxiv.org/abs/1508.02277).

Some theorists have proposed that these exotic particles instead hint that the Higgs boson is not fundamental particle. Instead, it could be a composite, and some of its constituents would account for the observed signals.

“In my opinion, the most plausible explanation is in the context of composite Higgs models,” says Adam Falkowski at CERN. “If this scenario is true, that would mean there are new symmetries and new forces just around the corner.”

“If the Higgs is really a composite particle, that would mean new forces just around the corner”

The next step is for the existence of the right-handed W’ boson to be confirmed or ruled out.


[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]




In physics, a charge may refer to one of many different quantities, such as the electric charge in electromagnetism or the color charge in quantum chromodynamics. Charges correspond to the time-invariant generators of a symmetry group, and specifically, to the generators that commute with the Hamiltonian. Charges are often denoted by the letter Q, and so the invariance of the charge corresponds to the vanishing commutator [ Q , H ] = 0 {\displaystyle [Q,H]=0} , where H is the Hamiltonian. Thus, charges are associated with conserved quantum numbers; these are the eigenvalues q of the generator Q.
.
.

The thing that "flows" in the current is the "charge",

Something is in charge.

Well.....


What is the 'one-electron universe theory' in layman terms?

Eric Platt, PhD in Mathematics, Studies Mathematical Physics
Answered Apr 3, 2017 ·

An electron has a negative unit charge, and its antiparticle the positron has a positive unit charge. They have the same mass as well as other properties.

In quantum field theory an antiparticle can be thought of as the original particle but going backwards in time. A positive charge being repelled by another positive charge is the same as attraction as a negative charge when you reverse time.

The ‘one-electron’ theory has been discredited though. As Senia mentioned we see a lot of electrons in the universe, but not so many positrons.

I would also add that in field theories you have closed loops. A photon can become a particle-antiparticle pair, and then recombine back into a photon. On the scale of the universe that particle and antiparticle had no effect. However on it’s own scale it is in a sense true. Instead of thinking of it as 2 particles, you can think of it as one particle bouncing back and forth in time between the two photons.

Answers Below

In layman's terms, what is the 'one electron universe theory'?
[link to www.quora.com (secure)]

Senia Sheydvasser, B.A. in Physics
Answered Apr 3, 2017 ·

Positrons are particles much like electrons—they have the same mass and other properties, but they have opposite electric charge. A huge triumph of early quantum theory (1920s and 1930s) was the prediction and subsequent discovery of the positron.

It was noted around this time that, mathematically, one could think of a positron as an electron that was traveling back in time. This led to a very interesting hypothesis, apparently first stated in 1940 by John Wheeler: there is only one electron/positron in the universe!

Wheeler’s idea was that there was only one electron, which was zipping around the universe forwards and backwards in time—when it is traveling forward in time, we perceive it as an electron. When it is traveling backwards, we perceive it as a positron. The points at which it switches from one to the other we perceive as an electron/positron pair that either mutually annihilate or spontaneously come into existence (which is what happens with matter/anti-matter pairs like the electron and the positron).

This became known the one-electron universe postulate. This postulate has an incredibly nice consequence: it explains why all electrons/positrons in the universe have the same physical properties—there is just one of them. Unfortunately, it has one major problem: given this postulate, one would expect that the amount of electrons and positrons in the universe should be roughly equal. But that is not at all what we observe—positrons are rare, while electrons are plentiful. So, while it is a very interesting idea, it is probably not correct.






....or is it probably a correct idea?


'I' and 'I-I' - A Reader's Query

[link to davidgodman.org]

....If the 'I-I' or aham sphurana experience occurs immediately before realisation, and not after it, is there any evidence to show that Bhagavan himself went through such an experience on the day of his own realisation? I think there is, although it is somewhat flimsy. I will begin by quoting one other verse that Bhagavan wrote:



Therefore on diving deep upon the quest

'Who am 'I' and from whence?'

thoughts disappear

And consciousness of Self then flashes forth

As the 'I-I' within the cavity

Of every seeker's Heart…(19)