Zimmerman should be charged with INVOLUNTARY manslaughter

he should be charged with NOTHING.....!!!!!!

THUGS all of them---- shame on those who even arested him.

Let the morons riot-- thats all they know

I'm sure we have discussed every angle of the situation here.


Stop pooping on a heaping pile of shit

he confronted him? what did zimmerman say when he confronted him? since you know alot... very clear the trey boy liked to fight with text that didnt get into the court. i think zimmerman only watched his neighborhood and trey seen him and started whipping his a$$ and got shot.. thats it..

There are plenty of white thugs and creeps. Should blacks start confronting and shooting them over suspicion alone?

Either way this case is enough (for me personally) to go out depending on the verdict.

I know there are millions out there who's going to use this case as a catalyst.

what I don't understand is , why he couldnt hold him at gun point till the cops arrived , I mean how hard could that be , unless treyvon wasn't listening to reason and just kept coming at him , even still you just walk away while keeping your gun trained on him and tell him don't try anything or I will shoot. but I find it hard to believe he was forced to shoot him in the chest.

They said they have scientific proof the gunshot to martin and the "spread" on his shirt, that the gun was approximately 4-5 inches from chest. Cooperates with the idea that martin had him pretty well pinned down.

He shouldn't be charged with shit.

It took them 46 fucking days to arrest him only because the media and obama turned it into a race thing.

He didn't break any laws.

Had he broken a law he would have been arrested much sooner.

This is for the media circus and Obama's "son"

It's bullshit.

They are fucking up a man's life for politics. It's disgusting.

ok a/c 454 that's news to me, so he was left with no option, but to shoot him or be beatin to death , case closed self defence.

either way...he'll be tossing salads by the end of the month.

Here's just the first google link I came up with. [link to kdvr.com]

I'm sure if you search you'll find more.

But yea, this is going to be my catalyst to start fcken some shit up. :)

Zimmerman is a piece of shit in my book , the guy looks slow witted and even slower on his feet, why the stupid bastard couldn't pull his gun before getting tackled down is beyond me , he should have never been allowed to be a watchman for the complex. he,s is just one of those slow motion dudes . the kind that take 20 mins to make a sandwich

Always waiting on someone else to do something though. First hit/first shot and all that stupid jazz.

I bet treyvons parents could sue the apt owners insurance , having slow witted deputy dog type morons walking around with loaded pistols, who will invite themselves an asswhoopin for being nosey and unable to mind their own buissness.

He should get a medal.

so slow he put TM 6 feet under

is it just me or does Zimmerman look dumber than dog shit ???

I'm of the opinion that Zimmerman took steps before the incident that he otherwise would NOT have had he not been armed. He probably would NOT have confronted a young black male 4" taller than himself had he not been armed. The fact that he had a firearm gave him courage, courage that most likely led to the altercation that resulted in Martin's death. But it really all comes down to who initiated the first blow. Martin had a right to proceed as he pleased and Zimmerman also had a right to verbally confront Martin. If Zimmerman, as possessor of the firearm was the physical aggressor, he should be guilty of involuntary manslaughter at MINIMUM. If Martin was the physical aggressor, then Zimmerman should be found not guilty of any charge.

Fail.

Watching for supicious activity in a high crime area near your own home is not reckless. Calling the police and calmly answering their questions and arranging to meet with them in a few minutes is not reckless. Following someone briefly and then losing track of where they are while you are on the phone with the police is not reckless either.

This is how it used to be done, you were automatically charged with a crime anytime a shooting happened.

example; If a person came through your front door and your children were sleeping up stairs you legally had to run out the back door leave the kids and call the police from a location you retreated to, or if someone rear-ended you and your kids were in the back seat of the car and the person who hit you pulls a knife you legally had to run away from the fight, you had a “duty to retreat”.


In Ohio in the early 80’s a man went to jail for life for protecting his children, court said he could have retreated from the fight and the burglar had not threatened his sleeping children in the house only him and because he could have gotten away rather than defend himself he was guilty. That case started a chain reaction that lead to all the laws to be changed to “no duty to retreat”

Even more important with this Ohio case, because he was found guilty of a crime the family of the attacker was allowed to come back and file suit in civil court and take everything his family owned. So a guy breaks in your house shoots at you misses you wrestle the gun away and kill him saving your family you go to jail for life and the guys family who broke in gets everything you own.

Remember with the trial, Zimmerman does not have to prove he was threatened he only has to prove he “felt” threatened and it becomes justifiable, the reason for this is a guy points his finger at you from his coat pocket like a gun, you think he has a gun and you shoot him, you “believed” your life to be in danger and are not guilty and with the laws the way they are now you cannot be sued in court for civil damages by the attackers family. This is why it is not manslaughter, he “believed” he was in danger, he did not acutely have to be in danger for it to be justifiable.

I’ll yell if I remember the exact Ohio case…tip of my tongue, it was a very famous case everyone knew he should not go to jail but letter of the law said he was guilty at the time and this is why they changed the letter of the law.

He should be charged.

I totally "get you" however - Zimmerman went back to his vehicle and Trayvon followed him back and when Zimmerman turned around to Confront Trayvon, TM punched Zimmerman in the nose! He lost his "rights" from that point on! :)

Just sayin'

~ Haarpy

You have to realize this was in a GATED community. These people gate themselves as they fear robbery or personal attacks either due to being old and frail or past history of living in areas where harm occurred. You do NOT stroll about a gated community at night in a hoody or at night PERIOD.You skip going to buy candy not going with a gated member IN A CAR. I lived in a gated community and a school teacher neighbor was hijacked at gunpoint by the blacks up from Katrina in B'hm and wound up in ICU when they threw her out of the car after stabbing her in the chest leaving her for dead. When they came up we started getting robbed as they skipped the gates and came in through the trees and could get away on the interstate closeby that side. We called on anyone not known to us walking about after the nice teacher who was pregnant got carjacked and almost killed. Many went to gated communities with guards and community watch after the Katrina unload occurred. We didn't want to shoot the thugs as we considered we lived intownhouses too close together children might get hit but the police and help was way too slow. It seemed like they had it planned with blacks calling in bogus things downtown when they were going to hit the gated communities the police thought.

But if Zimmerman started the fight knowing that he had a gun in his pocket in case he was losing the fight, he is possibly guilty of involuntary manslaughter. You cannot start a fight with someone when you have a gun in your pocket and then claim you believed you were in danger if the other guy starts kicking your ass.

wow CHRIT well put , you should be a lawyer youz guys are very helpful , in taking time to splain these little details I wish I had a higher IQ but I guess I will have to make due with the 72 god gave me.

This is what I've been trying to say along when it comes to this case but nobody wants to hear the truth...


At the end of the day Zimmerman has to take responsibility for his actions...because of his bad judgement and lack of foresight he intentionally provoked a situation were he needed to defend himself and in the long run got an innocent person killed


Trayvvon was killed for minding his own business and I don't see how anybody can't see anything wrong with that..



If you don't then that means either your a racist, have no sense of morality whatsoever or just a person who doesn't know what it is to take responsibility for your own actions...


If Zimmerman walks away from this its going to start a horrible precedent...It's just going to show people that you can kill anybody over suspicion alone and that shit is straight up crazy ...

by next month he'll settle for a bottle of mouthwash.

Yet from everything so far presented, there is no proof of anything other than self defense.

How would you like it if the onus on proof was on your side instead and that in most cases, you could not be allowed to defend yourself as you would likely get 15 or more years for Involuntary Manslaughter?

Nice world to hand over to your children eh?

No, cops should be charged.

He called them FIRST and they didn't even show up until it was all over.

Where we're they? None of this would have happened if they dropped the donuts and flew out there.