Women absorb and carry living DNA and cells from every male they have sexual intercouse with

man seeing this topic i wouldn't fuck a single women anymore

fucking disgusting

so your kids have some genetic material of whoever your wife slept with in her life

man seeing this topic i wouldn't fuck a single women anymore

fucking disgusting

so your kids have some genetic material of whoever your wife slept with in her life

yer not supposed to fuck single women

you're only supposed to fuck your wife

the marriage bed is where the intimate union belongs

if only women would stick to this rule, and they would trust in monogamy, no sex before marriage

where would this civilization end my dear dude, dudette

if women wouldn't be so easy, the mend wouldn't be such assholes and man whores imo, because they wouldn't get the chance to be one in the first place if they'd be loyal, strict and with some personal rules

you have the pussy, you have the power, you get to decide

hope you got my point

the men wouldn't be such assholes and man whores imo, because they wouldn't get the chance to be one in the first place if they'd (the women) be loyal, strict and with some personal rules

it's on both

if all dudes were like me there would be no hos
thots, skanks, etc.

however, the worthless society we live in now
shuns, ridicules and hurls nasty abuse at dudes like me
~> ewww there must be something wrong with you if you aren't interested in meaningless, worthless, impersonal, shallow, hollow, fucking

I don't participate flippantly,
That union is the most sacred and precious intimate act a man and woman can share
and should not be mishandled in a worthless act of selfish indulgence
which is all that Chad, Vlad, Brad, and Tyrone are looking fo

No matter how much you try to ignore it, you cannot hide this above stated fact. This informs so much about Caucasians, their behavior, their treatment of dogs, and their abysmal treatment of other humans. As this thread shows, sex and who you have sex with MATTER. They're VERY IMPORTANT in fact. If you have sex with a man, his seed is in you for life. The same is true if you have sex with a dog. This is why Caucasians are so animalistic, evil and selfish. They lost their humanity thousands of years ago when they overrode their pheromonic system to engage in carnal lust with animals.

To hide this history, they treat ALL SEX as dirty when its just their bad choices that are dirty. So they pretend to be "puritans" and "better not curse there sonny boy!" So you don't realize the FILTH THEY COME FROM! If having sex with a dog affects you for the rest of your life and your children, as this thread proves, then having sex with dogs will eventually affect your entire race. ~10% of Caucasian filthy CLOWNS *ADMIT* to sleeping with their pets. These are the dumbasses that are so far gone that they don't care who knows it. Eventually, over thousands of years, centuries even, that 10% will churn out to the rest of the population.

Just like the vast majority of Caucasians have Neanderthal DNA, even though only a minority of Caucasians ever slept with them. Its the same thing with dogs. GROSS!

So if this is true, would any of this stuff show up on ancestry.com

Now realize that Caucasian women have been ingesting the dna and sex cells of canines for thousands of years, and you understand why Caucasians are so "close and comfortable" with those animals....

I don't think there are any dog breeds listed on ancestry.com, so for Caucasian women, you would only be getting 10-20% of the truth.

What is the animal of choice for arabian women?

Threadhas taken na dark turn

New genomic data suggests that when Europeans emerged from the last ice age they were close to becoming extinct.

In some cases, small bands of potentially as few as 20 to 30 people could have been moving over very large areas, over the whole of Europe as a single territory, according to Professor Ron Pinhasi, principal investigator on the EU-funded ADNABIOARC project.

This demographic model is based on new evidence that suggests populations were much smaller than is generally thought to be a stable size for healthy reproduction, usually around 500 people. Such small groupings may have led to reduced fitness and even extinctions.

‘As an archaeologist and anthropologist, I was quite shocked to see how limited, how small the population numbers were. You know, shockingly small,’ said Prof. Pinhasi, based at University College Dublin, Ireland.

‘I think that what happened, it’s on a catastrophic level of demography for a long time in human evolution,’ he said.

The impacts of this are significant for understanding the origins of many Europeans today, as it is forcing researchers to reconsider models of human expansion and colonisation of the continent, as well as our genetic ancestry.

By analysing the genomes of human remains, the researchers are able to gather demographic data and clues to potential population sizes.

Prof. Pinhasi’s team has found that the genomes sequenced from hunter-gatherers from Hungary and Switzerland between 14 000 to 7 500 years ago are very close to specimens from Denmark or Sweden from the same period.

These findings suggest that genetic diversity between inhabitants of most of western and central Europe after the ice age was very limited, indicating a major demographic bottleneck triggered by human isolation and extinction during the ice age.

‘You see a real reduction in population numbers and diversity, so you see the few lineages that probably split or separated before the ice age, and then stayed isolated during the ice age,’ he said. ‘Some time after the ice age, they kind of re-emerge, or disperse, and get together, as we see new contributions to European lineages from Asia and in particular the Near East.’

Population bottlenecks occur when a population's size is reduced for at least one generation. Because genetic drift acts more quickly to reduce genetic variation in small populations, undergoing a bottleneck can reduce a population's genetic variation by a lot, even if the bottleneck doesn't last for very many generations. This is illustrated by the bags of marbles shown below, where, in generation 2, an unusually small draw creates a bottleneck.

Loss of genetic variation as a result of a population bottleneck

Reduced genetic variation means that the population may not be able to adapt to new selection pressures, such as climatic change or a shift in available resources, because the genetic variation that selection would act on may have already drifted out of the population.

man seeing this topic i wouldn't fuck a single women anymore

fucking disgusting

so your kids have some genetic material of whoever your wife slept with in her life

In this study they provide a description of male Mc in the female human brain and specific brain regions. The study was originally trying to determine if women who have been pregnant with a son might be more predisposed to certain neurological diseases since these certain diseases occur more frequently in males.

"Collectively with data showing the presence of male DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid [32], our results indicate that fetal DNA and likely cells can cross the human blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reside in the brain. Changes in BBB permeability occur during pregnancy [33] and may therefore provide a unique opportunity for the establishment of Mc in the brain. Also unique to our study are the findings that male Mc in the human female brain is relatively frequent (positive in 63% of subjects) and distributed in multiple brain regions, and is potentially persistent across the human lifespan (the oldest female in whom male DNA was detected in the brain was 94 years)."

Through the study they blindly and politically assume that all male Mc DNA found hosting in the female brain was from a male pregnancy. Funny how even our brightest scientists can live in denial.

BUT, when they autopsied the brains of women who had never even been pregnant they STILL found male DNA prevalent in the female brain.

They did their best to hide the evidence. They buried it in numerous sub studies but I sifted through it all and found the damning statement, the one they tried to avoid. The statement that every single article written about this extremely important study completely censored and left out.

What are they so afraid of??

"CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women."

Its so convenient how they flat out ignore the MOST OBVIOUS source of microchimerism male DNA hosting inside the female body. And the periodicals just deleted it alltogether. The scum bags.

This has very important ramifications for women. Especially promiscuous women who practice unprotected sexual intercourse. Every male you absorb spermatazoa from becomes a living part of you FOR LIFE. The women autopsied in this study were elderly. Some had carried the living male DNA for well over 50 years!

This will certainly piss the feminists off. But it explains so much about women, life, and relationships.

Sperm is alive. It is living cells. When it is injected into you it swims and attaches and burrows into your flesh. If its in your mouth it swims and climbs into your nasal passages, inner ear, and behind your eyes. Then digs in. It enters your blood stream and collects in your brain and spine. Like something out of a scifi movie.

I love how the agenda has convinced young ladies to be promiscuous. They knowingly are sabotaging generations of young women. Of COURSE they are.

The male DNA can also pass into and become part of a fetus from an entirely different male. So if your woman has a long track record, then your kids are likely carrying DNA from her past hookups.

Is this why the ancient Sumerian Gods specifically said to not have premarital sex? Is this why they forbid homosexuality?

We have only begun to understand the power and ramifications of this.
Links below:

[link to www.plosone.org]

[link to www.plosone.org]

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

Page 100 bitches, we’re gaining on us navy sunk a frog sub in the gulfo thread!!

In this study they provide a description of male Mc in the female human brain and specific brain regions. The study was originally trying to determine if women who have been pregnant with a son might be more predisposed to certain neurological diseases since these certain diseases occur more frequently in males.

"Collectively with data showing the presence of male DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid [32], our results indicate that fetal DNA and likely cells can cross the human blood-brain barrier (BBB) and reside in the brain. Changes in BBB permeability occur during pregnancy [33] and may therefore provide a unique opportunity for the establishment of Mc in the brain. Also unique to our study are the findings that male Mc in the human female brain is relatively frequent (positive in 63% of subjects) and distributed in multiple brain regions, and is potentially persistent across the human lifespan (the oldest female in whom male DNA was detected in the brain was 94 years)."

Through the study they blindly and politically assume that all male Mc DNA found hosting in the female brain was from a male pregnancy. Funny how even our brightest scientists can live in denial.

BUT, when they autopsied the brains of women who had never even been pregnant they STILL found male DNA prevalent in the female brain.

They did their best to hide the evidence. They buried it in numerous sub studies but I sifted through it all and found the damning statement, the one they tried to avoid. The statement that every single article written about this extremely important study completely censored and left out.

What are they so afraid of??

"CONCLUSIONS: Male microchimerism was not infrequent in women without sons. Besides known pregnancies, other possible sources of male microchimerism include unrecognized spontaneous abortion, vanished male twin, an older brother transferred by the maternal circulation, or SEXUAL INTERCOURSE. Male microchimerism was significantly more frequent and levels were higher in women with induced abortion than in women with other pregnancy histories. Further studies are needed to determine specific origins of male microchimerism in women."

Its so convenient how they flat out ignore the MOST OBVIOUS source of microchimerism male DNA hosting inside the female body. And the periodicals just deleted it alltogether. The scum bags.

This has very important ramifications for women. Especially promiscuous women who practice unprotected sexual intercourse. Every male you absorb spermatazoa from becomes a living part of you FOR LIFE. The women autopsied in this study were elderly. Some had carried the living male DNA for well over 50 years!

This will certainly piss the feminists off. But it explains so much about women, life, and relationships.

Sperm is alive. It is living cells. When it is injected into you it swims and attaches and burrows into your flesh. If its in your mouth it swims and climbs into your nasal passages, inner ear, and behind your eyes. Then digs in. It enters your blood stream and collects in your brain and spine. Like something out of a scifi movie.

I love how the agenda has convinced young ladies to be promiscuous. They knowingly are sabotaging generations of young women. Of COURSE they are.

The male DNA can also pass into and become part of a fetus from an entirely different male. So if your woman has a long track record, then your kids are likely carrying DNA from her past hookups.

Is this why the ancient Sumerian Gods specifically said to not have premarital sex? Is this why they forbid homosexuality?

We have only begun to understand the power and ramifications of this.
Links below:

[link to www.plosone.org]

[link to www.plosone.org]

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov]

the men wouldn't be such assholes and man whores imo, because they wouldn't get the chance to be one in the first place if they'd (the women) be loyal, strict and with some personal rules