Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,196 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,509,344
Pageviews Today: 2,509,259Threads Today: 1,003Posts Today: 17,886
11:24 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists

 
PhennommennonnModerator
Forum Administrator

08/16/2013 08:48 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists, etc. We are told that this will strengthen protection for journalists. In reality, it could open the door for government persecution due to purposefully placed ambiguous language. This is certainly by design, as it is repeated in almost every law passed by Congress and signed by the President.

S. 987 (Free Flow of Information Act) defines what a media provider is and who a journalist is, and is not. However, Senator Feinstein is not satisfied with the language and wants it further restricted. According to a report, Feinstein says, “I’m concerned this would provide special privilege to those who are not reporters at all.” She is referring to bloggers and the likes of Edward Snowden, NSA whistle-blower. Feinstein went on to suggest that the term journalist only apply to those who report for mainstream media sources, and do so as a primary source of income. H. 1962, the House version of the bill, already includes such stipulation:

The term ‘‘covered person’’ means a person who, for financial gain or livelihood, is engaged in journalism and includes a supervisor, employer, parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of such covered person.

This meaning, if you aren’t being paid- then you don’t get protection under the new law.
Feinstein’s amendment, which is scheduled to be introduced will seek to restrict who is protected under the law. The Electronic Frontier Foundation reports that the amendment will require journalists to meet one of the following criteria:

working as a “salaried employee, independent contractor, or agent of an entity that disseminates news or information;”
either (a) meeting the prior definition “for any continuous three-month period within the two years prior to the relevant date” or (b) having “substantially contributed, as an author, editor, photographer, or producer, to a significant number of articles, stories, programs, or publications by an entity . . . within two years prior to the relevant date;” or
working as a student journalist “participating in a journalistic publication at an institution of higher education.” (emphases added)

read the rest here
[link to www.blacklistednews.com]
political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
PhennommennonnModerator  (OP)
Forum Administrator

08/16/2013 08:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
fuckage at its best.

lather rinse repeat.
political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 45032469
United States
08/16/2013 08:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

byekitty
PhennommennonnModerator  (OP)
Forum Administrator

08/16/2013 08:54 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

byekitty
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45032469


no-shitsylvania - has that ever stopped them??

look what the pres is gonna do...bypass CONgress to pass the climate change tax

[link to www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com]
political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
ar-15 nut

User ID: 44044090
United States
08/16/2013 08:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
[link to www.youtube.com]
We are a REPUBLIC.If we can keep it MORAN!
A pissed off American Veteran!
PhennommennonnModerator  (OP)
Forum Administrator

08/16/2013 09:00 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
im wondering how something like this effects GLP

i mean 'they' tried with that attributer bullshit - thus failed but....

theyll stop at nothing til they full control over the net & all communications

[link to www.youtube.com]

political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
PhennommennonnModerator  (OP)
Forum Administrator

08/16/2013 09:10 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
if youre not a real journalist unless you can show that you work for the MSM and do it as a primary source of income....
then youre not a real potus unless you can show a real birth certificate and can prove your eligibility under the constitution.

said.
political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 45238358
United States
08/16/2013 09:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
Can the states govern themselves, should the states govern themselves? Do as I say and not as I do. Got cha'.
PhennommennonnModerator  (OP)
Forum Administrator

08/16/2013 09:54 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
Can the states govern themselves, should the states govern themselves? Do as I say and not as I do. Got cha'.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45238358


not as long as they receive & continue to receive fed money
political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
InTheHood

User ID: 30806647
United States
08/16/2013 09:55 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
IMO: They are trying to drive the independents (online) out of business. I say if the independents on line receive any compensation (donation to website) then they should claim they are "paid" journalists. They are also trying to drive anyone spreading "news" that isn't coming from "bought and paid for news" off line by refusing them equivalent treatment.

Umm, maybe they are losing control of their propaganda machine? They sorta give their hand away every time they come up with these new and improved proposed laws/regs.
PhennommennonnModerator  (OP)
Forum Administrator

08/16/2013 09:56 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
IMO: They are trying to drive the independents (online) out of business. I say if the independents on line receive any compensation (donation to website) then they should claim they are "paid" journalists. They are also trying to drive anyone spreading "news" that isn't coming from "bought and paid for news" off line by refusing them equivalent treatment.

Umm, maybe they are losing control of their propaganda machine? They sorta give their hand away every time they come up with these new and improved proposed laws/regs.
 Quoting: InTheHood


that and control communications
political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1408596
United States
08/16/2013 10:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
fuckage at its best.

lather rinse repeat.
 Quoting: Phennommennonn


You are so cool
rolleyes
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1050874
United States
08/16/2013 10:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
All news reports must be approved by the
propoganda
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 45233404
Germany
08/16/2013 10:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
wait

there weren't any as of now? WTF
Vision Thing

User ID: 45133039
United States
08/16/2013 10:40 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
Are journalists going to be required to register with the federal government and get a license to practice?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1895888
North Macedonia
08/16/2013 10:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
you americans dont know what comunisam is...

you are communists now, no free press, more laws then a madafaka, and the most imortant if you argue you will be jailed.

that my american friends is communisam trust me i grew up in one.
PhennommennonnModerator  (OP)
Forum Administrator

08/16/2013 10:53 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
Are journalists going to be required to register with the federal government and get a license to practice?
 Quoting: Vision Thing


after 911 they started a buncha bullshit that freelance journalists & bloggers could no longer just get press passes.

cities would deny them

you have to be sponsored by a 'legit' medis source like msm newspaper or tv station.

my cities police dept controls that.

my old press pass isnt any good here.
political correctness is a doctrine.... fostered by a delusional, illogical minority...... and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media; which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.
Lady Jane SmithModerator
Forum Administrator

User ID: 44046686
United States
08/16/2013 10:58 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
They clearly want to shut up all bloggers & forums.

Desperately looking for any means to intimidate us into silence.
Fate whispers to the warrior

"You cannot withstand the storm"

the warrior whispers back

"I am the storm"

INTJ-A

Killer Bunny
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23766478
United States
08/16/2013 10:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
The past is our future:

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 44971872
United States
08/16/2013 11:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
V.I.P.
VERY
IMPORTANT
POST !!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29859448
Canada
08/16/2013 11:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
Feinstein and her lot are fucking Corpo-Fascist. Who are dumb fucks that voted her in?

She is a traitor.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1399610
United States
08/16/2013 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
Shut it all down.

Stop playing the game and that how you win. Don't lift a finger or even acknowledge them.
-GLP-Christian-

User ID: 39993991
Sweden
08/16/2013 11:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
That's a BS law.
Get saved wretch: [link to biblebelievers.com]
Everything you need to know about islam: [link to prophetofdoom.net]
The Jihad Triangle: [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

FRANCE IS TEH GHEY!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32069520
United States
08/16/2013 11:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
:obamaBS33:
PIR

User ID: 33479868
United States
08/16/2013 11:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
This will silence all bloggers and internet alternative news reporters.

I could see this coming.

The...end.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 43848440
United States
08/16/2013 11:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists, etc. We are told that this will strengthen protection for journalists. In reality, it could open the door for government persecution due to purposefully placed ambiguous language. This is certainly by design, as it is repeated in almost every law passed by Congress and signed by the President.

S. 987 (Free Flow of Information Act) defines what a media provider is and who a journalist is, and is not. However, Senator Feinstein is not satisfied with the language and wants it further restricted. According to a report, Feinstein says, “I’m concerned this would provide special privilege to those who are not reporters at all.” She is referring to bloggers and the likes of Edward Snowden, NSA whistle-blower. Feinstein went on to suggest that the term journalist only apply to those who report for mainstream media sources, and do so as a primary source of income. H. 1962, the House version of the bill, already includes such stipulation:

The term ‘‘covered person’’ means a person who, for financial gain or livelihood, is engaged in journalism and includes a supervisor, employer, parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of such covered person.

This meaning, if you aren’t being paid- then you don’t get protection under the new law.
Feinstein’s amendment, which is scheduled to be introduced will seek to restrict who is protected under the law. The Electronic Frontier Foundation reports that the amendment will require journalists to meet one of the following criteria:

working as a “salaried employee, independent contractor, or agent of an entity that disseminates news or information;”
either (a) meeting the prior definition “for any continuous three-month period within the two years prior to the relevant date” or (b) having “substantially contributed, as an author, editor, photographer, or producer, to a significant number of articles, stories, programs, or publications by an entity . . . within two years prior to the relevant date;” or
working as a student journalist “participating in a journalistic publication at an institution of higher education.” (emphases added)

read the rest here
[link to www.blacklistednews.com]
 Quoting: Phennommennonn


no act of congress has power to overturn the 1st Amendment. In law there is a hierarchy...the US Constitution is the highest law, and no congressional act has power to supersede the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. The ONLY way to change the 1st Amendment is by ratification by WE THE PEOPLE who have to vote the change in....congress knows this....no way free speech can be infringed upon by an Act of congress.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 43848440
United States
08/16/2013 11:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists, etc. We are told that this will strengthen protection for journalists. In reality, it could open the door for government persecution due to purposefully placed ambiguous language. This is certainly by design, as it is repeated in almost every law passed by Congress and signed by the President.

S. 987 (Free Flow of Information Act) defines what a media provider is and who a journalist is, and is not. However, Senator Feinstein is not satisfied with the language and wants it further restricted. According to a report, Feinstein says, “I’m concerned this would provide special privilege to those who are not reporters at all.” She is referring to bloggers and the likes of Edward Snowden, NSA whistle-blower. Feinstein went on to suggest that the term journalist only apply to those who report for mainstream media sources, and do so as a primary source of income. H. 1962, the House version of the bill, already includes such stipulation:

The term ‘‘covered person’’ means a person who, for financial gain or livelihood, is engaged in journalism and includes a supervisor, employer, parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of such covered person.

This meaning, if you aren’t being paid- then you don’t get protection under the new law.
Feinstein’s amendment, which is scheduled to be introduced will seek to restrict who is protected under the law. The Electronic Frontier Foundation reports that the amendment will require journalists to meet one of the following criteria:

working as a “salaried employee, independent contractor, or agent of an entity that disseminates news or information;”
either (a) meeting the prior definition “for any continuous three-month period within the two years prior to the relevant date” or (b) having “substantially contributed, as an author, editor, photographer, or producer, to a significant number of articles, stories, programs, or publications by an entity . . . within two years prior to the relevant date;” or
working as a student journalist “participating in a journalistic publication at an institution of higher education.” (emphases added)

read the rest here
[link to www.blacklistednews.com]
 Quoting: Phennommennonn


no act of congress has power to overturn the 1st Amendment. In law there is a hierarchy...the US Constitution is the highest law, and no congressional act has power to supersede the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. The ONLY way to change the 1st Amendment is by ratification by WE THE PEOPLE who have to vote the change in....congress knows this....no way free speech can be infringed upon by an Act of congress.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6321404
United States
08/16/2013 12:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
It is to ensure that the people's news is of the highest news sources. Without these protections in this information age, society can be led astray by people who have no stake in the profession of journalism. These bloggers have no responsibility for what they say, and who makes a better target for these anarchists than government itself?

Don't forget that we must also shut down the comedians, who's first skill is in deception, when they mock our great tradition of government. There are rodeo clowns on every street who think it's funny to undermine the importance and the honor of the public servant.

It's important for us to keep a good public image about our government. After all, who will build the roads?
waterlily

User ID: 43877463
United States
08/16/2013 12:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
They clearly want to shut up all bloggers & forums.

Desperately looking for any means to intimidate us into silence.
 Quoting: Lady Jane Smith


In China what they recently did to silence people, or at least those who were not so brave, was to require real name sign up for blog sites and online forums.

No more anonymity.

Here, people just sign up with false names, but they require more ID in China.

If you want to know what the future may hold for us, look to China.

OTOH, in some areas China is way behind us.
*********** WaterLily ***********
" Do I dare
Disturb the universe?"
-- T. S. Elliot, Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock

*************************************
“We are as ignorant of the meaning of the dragon as we are of the meaning of the universe.”
-- Jorge Luis Borges
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Pompey made his preparations for the war at the end of the winter, entered upon it at the commencement of spring,
and finished it in the middle of the summer."
-- Cicero, De Imperio Cn. Pompei
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 41130302
Canada
08/16/2013 12:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
no act of congress has power to overturn the 1st Amendment. In law there is a hierarchy...the US Constitution is the highest law, and no congressional act has power to supersede the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. The ONLY way to change the 1st Amendment is by ratification by WE THE PEOPLE who have to vote the change in....congress knows this....no way free speech can be infringed upon by an Act of congress.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43848440


You say that like you believe it, and yet here we are with these outrageous dictatorship laws/rules that are appearing right in front of you. Keep denying it, it just might make it go away.
natasha77

User ID: 35682194
United States
08/16/2013 12:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DC will now try and pass a law that will put parameters on media, journalism, journalists
Extreme fuckage.

Omfg
SPEAK UP. SILENCE IS DEADLY!

I am currently experiencing life at several WTFs per hour.





GLP