Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,198 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 511,737
Pageviews Today: 898,400Threads Today: 433Posts Today: 6,723
10:12 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man

 
Xerces
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 14245097
United States
09/23/2013 12:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
This isn't a bible thumping thread. Scroll down if you want to skip the verses and go to the scientific portion.

In the bible we are told that adam was created first, or man.

Gen 2:7
And the LORD God formed man (H120) of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Strong's H120 (man)
Transliteration: 'adam
man, mankind
man, human being
man, mankind (much more frequently intended sense in OT)
Adam, first man
city in Jordan valley
[link to www.blueletterbible.org]

We are then told that a "rib" was taken from man.

Gen 2:21
And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs (H6763), and closed up the flesh instead thereof;

Gen 2:22
And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.

Strongs for "took":
[link to www.blueletterbible.org]


Strong's H6763 (rib)
Transliteration: tsela`
side, rib, beam
rib (of man)
rib (of hill, ridge, etc)
side-chambers or cells (of temple structure)
rib, plank, board (of cedar or fir)
leaves (of door)
side (of ark)
[link to www.blueletterbible.org]

In the actual Strong's paper copy (specifically for Gen 2:21-22 it defines a rib as beams (as if the ribs of a building). Note also the fact that it refers to the side, chambers, and cells.

It is also interesting to note that H6763 mostly corresponds to chambers and construction in other bible verses. The word itself is feminine and may correlate with the original construction of humans.

The literal translation though does not make sense, as with nearly all of the bible. The bible contains many metaphorical analogies and deeper mysteries.

Seeing how a majority of the bible can be applied to DNA (links at bottom of post), it appears that this yet another case of a deeper meaning in the creation of man.

When we are conceived, a sperm carrying either an X or Y chromosome fertilizes the woman's egg which only consists an X chromosome. Upon fertilization the normal result is either an XX or XY combination.

There are other mutations but they are rare and must always contain an X chromosome.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The first 5-6 weeks of embryonic development is contributed to the X chromosome alone. A woman is fully developed only through the X chromosome as they possess only XX.

For a man however, the Y chromosome AFTER 5-6 weeks activates and one of the genes on the Y chromosome inhibits certain features of the X chromosome and develops the physical traits a man possess.

So we all develop initially as woman.




Chromosomes which house our DNA are the building blocks of life that we are constructed from. DNA is the blueprint of our being.

The man is missing a "rib", side, or cell. For this to be true, the cell must have been divided. Men are the only ones with the XY chromosome so it is apparently obvious that man truly had the rib taken him.

In order to have TAKEN a rib, something must have been there to begin with. It is impossible for humans to exist with a YY chromosomal setup, as the X is required for development and is the origin of our creation.

The only plausible explanation is that man was created from woman who possessed XX. The rib was divided from the X, leaving XY. It only makes sense that the woman was created first.

The side of the cell chamber…

chromosnip
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic."
-Dresden James

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
-Arthur Schopenhauer
Xerces  (OP)

User ID: 14245097
United States
09/23/2013 01:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
Bible related genetics:

Thread: The Secret Meaning of ‘Kingdom of God Within You’... Now Revealed - It’s Cell Biology!

Thread: The Tabernacle in the Wilderness is a Picture of an Ovum
"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic."
-Dresden James

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
-Arthur Schopenhauer
Truthseeker007

User ID: 32257929
United States
09/23/2013 02:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
Historically, there were beings on this planet that were
humanoid in nature. The species known as Neanderthal man was an evolutionary being that had developed on the planet, but it is also so that extraterrestrial beings came to the planet and modified, genetically engineered modern human beings.

The modern human being was not necessarily one brought from the stars, but rather one who was genetically altered to suit the needs of those extraterrestrial beings, those known as the Anunnaki.

They did create human beings, and therefore one could
say that human beings originated through the genetic
work of those aliens, but this has little to do with the
spiritual core that inhabits each human being.

The Neanderthal man and woman had their own spiritual core and those humans that were then modified so that modern mankind could be produced had this spiritual core as well, a continuance of spiritual consciousness having a physical life through a physical body. In some ways it does not matter whether it was a single natural evolutionary development that evolved the Neanderthal man and other types also that were in existence on the planet at that time, or whether it was accelerated through genetic manipulation to produce a more advanced human form for Spirit to occupy.

Ultimately, it still can be understood that Divine Consciousness was behind all, and that it was therefore part of a great plan to create a human form that is now known as modern mankind: modern man and modern woman. The process by which this was achieved is secondary to the intent of Divine Spirit.

Last Edited by Truthseeker007 on 09/23/2013 02:27 AM
Uncle Mikey

User ID: 2217240
United States
09/23/2013 12:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
What if...

rebis
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1579960
United States
09/23/2013 12:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
What type of man?

There are many.

Just as their are the infinite in women.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32069520
United States
09/23/2013 12:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
:AlienDNA33:

[link to www.lloydpye.com]
Uncle Mikey

User ID: 2217240
United States
09/23/2013 01:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
Speaking of ribs.

@8:00...

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1445080
Canada
09/23/2013 01:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
The bible is not a credible source. You are just trying, after the fact, to make modern discovery fit with the words of bronze superstition.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32069520
United States
09/23/2013 02:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
The bible is not a credible source. You are just trying, after the fact, to make modern discovery fit with the words of bronze superstition.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1445080


:cart33:

Like global warming, sun scare, saturated fat scare, etc by libtard scientists are credible.

cupofjoe
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1445080
Canada
09/23/2013 02:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
The bible is not a credible source. You are just trying, after the fact, to make modern discovery fit with the words of bronze superstition.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1445080


:cart33:

Like global warming, sun scare, saturated fat scare, etc by libtard scientists are credible.

cupofjoe
 Quoting: AlcoholicRunner


Foolish person. You know full well that those are not the subject matter. Are you one of those silly superstitious people who feels the need to protect the forgone conclusions inculcated into you by some shaman/priest/minister, with with specious irrelevance, off topic interjections and ad hominem attacks?
Xerces  (OP)

User ID: 14245097
United States
09/24/2013 10:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Who Was Made First? - Origin of Man
What if...

rebis
 Quoting: Uncle Mikey


Well essentially that is what it was before...but there wasn't a penis. Even in that video I posted you can see that the body has to undergo changes to compensate for the Y gene and everything originates from X initially.

The Y rib was taken from the X, and that means that originally it was XX.

In order to create the male parts, the body has to transform the ovaries into testicles and then seal up the hole leftover with what would be the labia forming the scrotum.

This is why for all men...if you look under your balls where your taint is...that originally was the development of a vagina. There is an obvious line where the tissues fused together. The body has to go out of it's way with the Y gene to seal that hole up.


"A truth's initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker, a raving lunatic."
-Dresden James

"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
-Arthur Schopenhauer





GLP