Two Witnesses of Revelation 11.3 and the Branch

What you wrote is not what my Lord spoke
into me

my Lord speaks to me often in remote areas as seems to be a pattern in the Bible also

Well PJ I did intend to respond to your accusations against me. But as I returned to your comments about "What S-wordlike wrote" it dawned upon me I pretty well answered most of your questions already.

I don't think I actually realized how superficial you actually were in your understanding scripture and void of discerning simple comprehension until I began reading your responses to my post.

Actually you have no concept of the body/soul/spirit of mankind's make-up and what it consist of.

Apparently from reading your statement you believe God's spirit is the portion that is of man's spirit. And I am assuming your reasoning consist of the soul of man and the spirit are the same dual make-up of the element within the flesh of an individual. In other-words you believe the soul and spirit of man is one of the same.

Wow! No wonder you consist of confusing statements and baffling beliefs in your post. If you haven't even the basic concept toward understanding man in his creators image; and doesn't even hold the same example of that same image as that of his creator, in body/soul (mind)/ and spirit. You would have a tendency to have a misconception of the bigger picture of a myriad of things relating to scripture.

God's Spirit doesn't live in man's body! He may dwell therein if invited. But he is never invited in the lives of nonbelievers. Yet, like all men they all have a spirit of their own, as well as a soul and a body. God's spirit can never constitute man's spirit within himself.

The only difference for the believer is the non-believer's spirit is asleep and will remain so throughout his/her life unless awakened by the grace of our Lord. Whereas, in the life of the believer it is awakened. Not just for the lone purpose to being awake but in the hope of awakening those who remain asleep!

This is the reason Enoch in the Ethiopian version of the Book of (1 Enoch.39:6) in Enoch's visitation to heaven he declares:

(1 Enoch.39:6) And in that place mine eyes saw the Elect One of righteousness and faith.

Now, we must pause here for a moment to dispel what most have always been taught and believed. That the Elect One is always talking about Jesus Christ! Well, no, not really!

First of all Jesus could never be considered the Elect One. For as Enoch will reveal later in his book within the passages. The elect were at one time of a sinful nature, and thus also, so would have been the Elect One. Jesus never had a sinful nature, and was neither born into this world with such a nature. For unlike all others, all mankind were blood-born subjects to their Father after sin. For their Father Satan had a claim to everyone through the fall of Adam to the bondage of sin.

Nevertheless, Jesus was not subject to a fleshly bondage but born after the spirit and came forth a free man from his Father of Righteousness.

So Jesus could never be categorized as the Elect One. For of all the endeavors he undertook either in his earthly conquest or the heavenly realm, Jesus as the omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent God. He was never elected to do anything. He chose to be our savior, not elected to be. He chose to give his life for us, not because he was elected to do so. He did all that he did by his own choosing and decisions. Not as someone elected to some office. Jesus is a King not someone Elected!

Thus, that Elect One, that servant, in (Isa.42:1KJV) is not the Father speaking of his Son Jesus, as men of little understanding has taught other foolish men. But Jesus is speaking about his spiritual son his loyal servant.

How do we know that it is Jesus speaking and declaring his servant and not the Father speaking about Jesus. Because the word declares who it is that is speaking about his Elect One and who it is that is speaking in the following verses

The Word declares it is Jesus speaking about this servant, his Elect One, and the purpose of that Elect One/servant in the end days, throughout chapters (Isa.40-49KJV).

Thus to make it understandable, the Word declares the speaker as the following individual:

The one who is the King of Jacob (Isa41:21KJV).
The Holy one of Israel, thy savior (Isa 43:3KJV).
The Lord your redeemer, the Holy One of Israel (Isa.43:14KJV).
I am the Lord your Holy One of Israel, Your King (Isa. 43:15KJV).
Thus, saith the Lord, thy Redeemer and that formed thee from the womb, I am the lord that makes all things, that stretches forth the heavens alone: that spreads abroad the earth by myself (Isa.44:24KJV).

Now all theses verses and different passages speaks clearly as to this one being called the Redeemer; (Only Jesus has that title (Redeemer), for he alone paid the price. This one speaking claims to be the creator of all things, and stretched out the heavens and spread abroad the earth by himself This is the one who is called the Word who came in the flesh. Even the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.

Even the Word was in the beginning and he created all things, even/only Jesus (John 1:1-14KJV). The king of Jacob/Israel, only Jesus holds that title. The Word seeks to make it clear the speaker here is not the Father but the Son (Jesus) who is declaring his Elect One.

YET, TO MAKE IT EVEN CLEARER JESUS ALSO DECLARES HIS ELECT ONE, SERVANT, HIDDEN ONE IN (ISA.49:2KJV). AND THAT HE HAS HID HIM IN THE SHADOW OF HIS HAND(work). Making it very clear that of the Godhead only Jesus has the ability to cast a shadow to hid someone. Because of the trinity only Jesus consist of the bodily make-up of flesh and bone after his resurrection; and thus able to cast a shadow. And these passages are speaking of a distant future at the time of its writings and an end time happening.

Now we know according to scripture, the Word cannot contradict itself. Thus, the Word declares that God the Father of lights has no shadow, neither a shadow of turning (James.1:17KJV) For the Father is of Spirit and light and thus is not able to cast shadows, neither that of the Holy Spirit because again he is of spirit and not of flesh.

So according to scripture there is an Elect, hidden, servant hidden for the end days; but it isn't Jesus. And no man can see him or understand his coming or those that be with him until the daytime (light of revelation), (2 Esdras.13:52KJV). And who can see what Jesus has hidden. And who has helped concealed this evidence from those uninformed. Men of tradition and false understandings; claiming to know not what they themselves cannot see within God's Word.

So Enoch in his vision sought to understand and desired the placement the Elect one was seated. And Enoch sought to rest in that place and dwell beneath that lofty place beneath the wings of the Lord of spirits even the (Most High).

Now what Enoch saw was a high place of order; a dwelling therein by on who is called the Elect One, the son of man, the chosen one, the righteous one, the hidden one. And Enoch desired that place. Now Enoch knew this was not the seating place of one of the Godhead's for in so knowing he would never sought such a position. But he knew that it was the highest order of a mortal man. The preeminent one amongst the chosen, called, patriots and the saints of God, who would rule in his age (1 Enoch.39:6).

Enoch was promised a portion of where that man sat. Enoch could not understand how he could be given a portion of that which he so desired. But later Enoch when he ask who was that son of man, he was told it was himself.

Now what Enoch was told is the it was himself setting in that lofty place and he was that man he had beheld. Although Enoch would one day fulfill that position (portion) in part, as was promised to him. Enoch could not understand, he was in part beholding himself but in/of his spirit only. He didn't recognize the body or the soul of that man therein upon that throne. For it was that Enoch to come forth for the end days and show himself that he was beholding and he didn't recognize the facial features, for only that one’s spirit was of Enoch.

S-wordlike.

What’s the difference between a Jacob and an Israel? An Israel is and always was a firstborn....a Jacob is a second born whose name is changed to Israel and receives the firstborn blessing of the birthright. A Jacob started out as a second born....Israel’s started out as first borns and remain unchanged ......that is what the grafting in of the second born is about....you have to have a firstborn and a separate second born who will both have dominion.....Adam was never a Jacob/second born who had to have a name change to become a firstborn Israel as he already was an Israel. It’s the second borns who need the name change to become Israel’s not the actual firstborns as they already have that title. The problem the firstborns have is they don’t know the second borns get the birthright in order to have dominion over the priesthood on earth.....firstborns are kings ....second borns use the birthright to be the earthly high priest in order to bring salvation to the jues and armeghedon gentiles during the millennium.....but that is for another time at a future date in another realm...lol....til then have a good journey.


Ezekiel 37:22:

And I will make them one nation in the land upon the mountains of Israel; and one king shall be king to them all: and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more at all.......you can’t have 2 kingdoms/two families/two nations without having 2 representatives ......and with the reunification one representative isn’t going to take the other representatives dominion....because one representative is the king and the other representative is the high priest therefore when the reunification happens both representative will keep their dominion only the reunification will allow them to have dominion over both kingdoms...one king and the other high priest.
:leftrightkingpri:

Until you realize there are 2 Israel’s ....a firstborn israel and a second born Jacob whose name is changed to Israel then your understanding will be stunted because Jesus is not only king of the firstborn but also of the second born.....which the volume of the book is about the separation and reunification of the firstborn Israel and second born Jacob whose name will be changed to Israel ....to bring forth the unification/marriage of the two kingdoms/families/representatives to make the two to become one.

In a marriage/unification who receives the name change? The feminine as the masculine already has the name. The kingship is the spiritual masculine...the priesthood is the spiritual feminine...The spiritual masculine is the firstborn...the spiritual feminine is the second born. Therefore Jacob the 2nd born is the spiritual feminine as Jacob gets the name change and uses the birthright to have dominion over the spiritual feminine position of the priesthood.

:Joseph and Judah:


Ask yourself if you were the representative of one of the two kingdoms and the reunification was happening would you say to the other representative take my dominion and I’ll just become one of your subjects? No one would give up a kingdom given to them and give all dominion to another. If they do then they never respected the privilege of having the dominion they were given.

:adameveside1:

:tree123::tree123:

PJ

that you stupidly think that when the person that God has chosen according to His Holy Scripture is so "weak" as to be banned he cannot be God's witness.

Let me tell you this, that God gives you the opportunity to show on what side you are, Satan's or God's, so He lets your rules play for some time to let you prove yourselves just, for afterwards, i.e. when God's true witnesses are public you can in no way dominate them anymore.

Your unrightheous treatment will then be seen by the whole world of those who care about what prophecy tella, the rest can go to hell as they decide.

God's power is coming, so you great country of world mission shall be seen for what you are!

Greetings
God's true witness

And you, S-wordlike (who is just like and not real) shall burn in hell for all eternity if you do not realise that it is indeed God's foretold last time witness who speaks to you!

Whoever I am

had been operated by honest people who don't meddle with spiritual things they do not understand, then I would be given the opportunity to prove you S-wordlike to what is nothing else than satanic!!!

God's witness spoke

What’s the difference between a Jacob and an Israel? An Israel is and always was a firstborn....a Jacob is a second born whose name is changed to Israel and receives the firstborn blessing of the birthright. A Jacob started out as a second born....Israel’s started out as first borns and remain unchanged ......that is what the grafting in of the second born is about....you have to have a firstborn and a separate second born who will both have dominion.....Adam was never a Jacob/second born who had to have a name change to become a firstborn Israel as he already was an Israel. It’s the second borns who need the name change to become Israel’s not the actual firstborns as they already have that title. The problem the firstborns have is they don’t know the second borns get the birthright in order to have dominion over the priesthood on earth.....firstborns are kings ....second borns use the birthright to be the earthly high priest in order to bring salvation to the jues and armeghedon gentiles during the millennium.....but that is for another time at a future date in another realm...lol....til then have a good journey.


Ezekiel 37:22:

And I will make them one nation in the land upon the mountains of Israel; and one king shall be king to them all: and they shall be no more two nations, neither shall they be divided into two kingdoms any more at all.......you can’t have 2 kingdoms/two families/two nations without having 2 representatives ......and with the reunification one representative isn’t going to take the other representatives dominion....because one representative is the king and the other representative is the high priest therefore when the reunification happens both representative will keep their dominion only the reunification will allow them to have dominion over both kingdoms...one king and the other high priest.


Until you realize there are 2 Israel’s ....a firstborn israel and a second born Jacob whose name is changed to Israel then your understanding will be stunted because Jesus is not only king of the firstborn but also of the second born.....which the volume of the book is about the separation and reunification of the firstborn Israel and second born Jacob whose name will be changed to Israel ....to bring forth the unification/marriage of the two kingdoms/families/representatives to make the two to become one.

In a marriage/unification who receives the name change? The feminine as the masculine already has the name. The kingship is the spiritual masculine...the priesthood is the spiritual feminine...The spiritual masculine is the firstborn...the spiritual feminine is the second born. Therefore Jacob the 2nd born is the spiritual feminine as Jacob gets the name change and uses the birthright to have dominion over the spiritual feminine position of the priesthood.




Ask yourself if you were the representative of one of the two kingdoms and the reunification was happening would you say to the other representative take my dominion and I’ll just become one of your subjects? No one would give up a kingdom given to them and give all dominion to another. If they do then they never respected the privilege of having the dominion they were given.

PJ.. Toward your reply concerning your desire to display a form of intellectual grasp of scripture and its comprehensible meaning; you have of course once again failed.

You claim that the resurrection of mankind is not complete until the last day. That is true. Yet this subject matter being discuss in your post has nothing even close to the point that was being projection against your argument. You only speak of the final victory of mankind's purpose in body/soul/spirit. But you leave us no explanation of other reasons Elijah again appears or Enoch is translated but never returns as of yet.

You're a common example of all cult leaders/false prophets/and fake teachers through the years that desire to take God's Word out of context and apply/twist it to your own reasoning and interpretation. And I have studied many and ran into a few for myself. Your concepts are veiled as has been all false teachers having such desires over the ages, from Satan's time until foolish men begin to first appear.

Your example in (John.6:39KJV) is of the full joint make-up of all three elements of man in the last day description of his body/soul/and spirit.

This concept has nothing to do with the soul or spiritual portion of God's perspective of man's overall condition/final arrangement. There are more than one aspect toward the advancement of reaching that final goal.

For the believer it must start with rebirth. Next requires the advancement within that birth whether it be toward glory or shame at his appearing.. For few are made-up after the example of the gold/silver/and precious jewels.

Next is the walk and finally our death. But this is not the last days for us in this death but a holding place whether believers or non-believers. For the believer our place is obvious declared in (2 Cor.5:8KJV) To be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord.

Thus, your theory of laying in death for ages before that last days is contrary to the Word and holds no truth as toward the way you express/interpret it. This meaning only applies to the body/flesh of man, (John.6:39KJV). But not to the spirit or the soul of man.

How can a believer's spirit die once it is made alive by God's Spirit? Although beforehand it was asleep, as is the non-believers now. In Christ it lives and comprehends truth!

As toward the unbeliever; Jesus gave us an example through his parable concerning the rich man, (Luke.16:19-31KJV), And at his death he was summarily in Sheol/Hades, in soul/spirit and a form of his body. Yet his carcass remained in the dust of the ground. And he was reaping the evil excesses in his life he had sown in the land of his living.

But your biggest folly excludes the fact our example as believers must be in conformity to the example of our Lord and his transformation at his death. (Rom.8:29KJV) For whom he first foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn of many brethren.

Thus, Christ gives us an example that he is a risen Christ, alive and living. And not some body waiting in the grave, died in body/spirit/and soul. Thus being Unable to respond to God or others.

If we as believers are to be conformed in his Son's image as God commands (Rom.8:29KJV). How shall we remain in such a lifeless state at the time of our death?

And shall not those patriots that rose up with Christ at the time of his death/calling should have also remained in that permanent state of death, as you claim until the last day. Instead we read they rose from their graves walking about the city of Jerusalem after they had been dead, (Matt.27:52-53KJV), and according to you PJ could not have possibly return until the last day.

I have many other things to say to you PJ, about other misconceptions of your interpretations of scripture and your general lack of understanding the meaning of the Word. As for the promise men of faith had not yet found their purpose (Heb.11:39-40KJV). You once again, as you do with most of scripture take its meaning completely out of context. It was their home they sought for, not their purpose. Their faith constituted their purpose. You speak as if they sought their bodies it was not so.

I will discuss these things in another post soon. But I have only so much time. I will respond to all the charges you wrongly claim against me. And will again and again reveal the arrogance of your beliefs

In the meantime I would suggest you start studying the Word of God and not just reading it. Apparently you lack so in understanding it, in just reading it.

Greetings to you as well.

PJ

PJ

Waterman has a need to conjure up an individual that has no existence in Scripture. No two individuals are named Jacob and Israel. Only one is so named; Jacob who God named Israel (meaning prince) are both the same man/individual. There are not two men separate in themselves meant to be called Israel and another Jacob.

This is only another fantasy of his own version of some homemade scripture that he seeks to consecrate within his own paradox. Yet, in other examples Jacob and Israel can be construed as two subject matters when applied to nations/tribal positions, and of course misinterpretations of its meaning. But it is never meant to be used as two separate individuals.

As far as Waterman spewing out his version of traditional examples of the past projections of old things and old ways. He fails to heed scripture and the Words declared clearly in Scripture.

(Mark.7:13KJV) Making the Word of God of none effect through your tradition which you have handed down. And many such things you do.

Thus, instead of following what the Word declares now that Christ has exampled a new thing and put to death traditional examples. We have most who still follow tradition and not the ways of Christ. Even to believing that the Temple is the example of God's dwelling place. When in reality they shall form such a monstrosity for the setting of the anti-Christ. For men seek not the true Temple of God and those who dwell therein. For they look for the old things and failed traditions and the old ways!

But such traditional things are now contradictory to the Word and the confirmation of the final actions of our God. And above all the example of our affirmative actions as his example. For through Jesus' actions all traditions are nullified and all ways become a new example of past and old ways.

(2 Cor.5:7KJV) "Therefore if any man be in Christ he is a new creature (creation):Old things are passed away; all things are become new (even traditions)."

Thus, what is our obligation in this scenario. Our obligation is to conform to the ways of his Son not following after old traditions. Men who follow not the examples of Christ, are bound to follow traditions, and are as dead as their inward being. Thus, they follow after sight and hold onto nothing after the example of faith. And they build buildings of false worship to view and examples of silly traditions of non-conforming toward God's own command. For we walk by faith not by sight (2 Cor..5:7KJV).

(Rom.8:9KJV) But ye are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if so be the Spirit of God dwells in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.

(Rom.8:29KJV) "For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn of many brethren."

We are called to conform to the Image of his Son; not to follow some silly tradition. Of course traditional observance was appropriate in its time and after its example. And it was required in its time to follow the ways of a dual office fulfilled by two different individual. One a royal position the other a priestly one.

And if one sought to fill the others position the wrath of God would surely descend. Not that the two position was not meant to be fulfilled by a single individual eventually, to eliminate that tradition. But that Individual had to accomplish the greater task of fulfilling both his position as king and priest through a sacrificial death.

Afterwards, then that dual position was meant to be one office, both in heaven and on earth as our example of our conforming to his Son; as God desires (Rom.8:29KJV).

Now some, like Waterman, say this is meant at some future date even long after the millennial reign, when we all will be in heaven. No for the Word must never contradict itself.

Now we are told that we as believers in (1 Pet.2:9KJV):

(1Pet.2:9) But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should show forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.

If Peter were addressing only those who one day end up in heaven; and not believers here and now on earth. Why would he say we are a peculiar people? In heaven we wouldn't be peculiar but would blend in with all the other Saints. No he is speaking to the believers of his day and the future generation /followers in Christ on earth.

So during those and these days the royal office and the priesthood seems to blend into one (a royal Priest-hood). No not sometime somewhere in heaven, but on earth!

This is why the prince of/in Israel shall be of a royal nature, (a prince) (Ezek.44:3KJV). And also the same man of a priestly figure in (Ezek.46:2KJV). This individual called a prince throughout these chapters (Ezek.44-47KJV) are speaking of the same individual as certified by all Scholars, Theologians, and Rabbis that look at his name in scripture as (NASI). Thus, meaning a governor/ruler/king president/leader, it is but one individual fulfilling both offices during the millennial age, and not two individuals in two different offices!

Thus, PJ if you are concurring with waterman's version as it seems you are. You might be as confused as him in comprehending the deeper things of Scriptural meanings and the more lucid purpose of its sole endeavors.

I don’t know which is the greater conundrum to be able to see the other anointed and he can’t see you or to be the other anointed who can’t find the other anointed. Quite a quandary indeed.

The broken brotherhood a dual purpose it certainly serves.

Who can see who and who can see what will tell a lot ....lol

Don't put all your eggs in one basket. If that is all the confirmation you have..you lack.

Blindness is in the eyes of the beholder my friend. And thus giving directions to others leads all in the same ditch. We both know for sure one is a witness; but never convinced by both that the other is. Wishing for something doesn't make it so.

Let's not discuss this on this thread it serves no purpose toward either of our purposes. Be content we believe what we do and leave it at that.

Certainly one is a witness and that witness will be David the earthly king in a davidic/levitic kingdom as scriptures state. It would have been a great place to tell us he will also be the earthly high priest but no such mention...if it did then it wouldn’t be a levitic kingdom it would be a melchelzedek kingdom.


Hosea 3:5:


King James Bible
Afterward shall the children of Israel return, and seek the LORD their God, and David their king; and shall fear the LORD and his goodness in the latter days.





David is the son of David so you just run up the line to see which of the 12 sons blessings this David will receive and as we know it is the blessings of Judah which is the sceptre. There is no mention of the priesthood coming from Judah as hebs. tells us

As we know the 12 sons of Israel were 12 princes therefore Judah is a prince and Joseph is a prince.....makes it easier to know which prince is being spoken of if you know David/Judah does the kingly dominion and Joseph does the high priest duties

Numbers 1:44:

Numbers 1:44
King James Version
44 These are those that were numbered, which Moses and Aaron numbered, and the princes of Israel, being twelve men: each one was for the house of his fathers





There is only one of two lines the high priest can come from. Levi but as we know from Ezekiel 46 the prince who is high priest owns land and Levi’s can’t own so the only other line the high priest can come from is the birthright line which is the line of Joseph...therefore one anointed is Judah and the other is Joseph....hence 1 chronicles 5:2 Judah is the chief leader but the birthright is Joseph’s.

Be careful, your birthright comes forth from me. If therefore that be the case how can there be a difference in our lineage. Even Christ descended from David's ancestry, but holds the priesthood as well. Thus did that also make him a Levi as well, to become High Priest?

We discussed all this again and again remember. You have a tendency to confuse individuals with tribes and nations when it refers to the different meanings of certain prophetic understandings. Christ changed much of these traditional ceremonies at his resurrection. Including ceremonial customs, dietary practices of certain meats and traditional customary practices that are no longer necessary. Such as the practice of stoning for certain offenses or two men holding dual offices of King and High Priest.

Now you will come up with same new excuse that is not scriptural. And declare some reason; like its not for this time but the future..because I said so...lol. But that's not pertinent to us who follow scripture and not some made up reason or line.

Believe as you will. At this point of my life it's not a big concern of mine how you believe. Just don't seek to convince me you are one of the witnesses. For you have no confirmations or testimonies from any other that God has shown this to be a truth. If you cannot verify this with one or two witnesses then it is nothing more than the wishful thinking of a confused individual.

You may claim God didn't give Joseph two or three witnesses to testify of him. Yet even those around him recognized God was with him and favored him. Not so with you my friend, most including your family believes you're nuts, and not favored, as you can well attest...lol.

Besides the law did not require two or more witnesses in Joseph's day. That law didn't come forth until (Deut.19:15KJV) hundreds of yrs. after Joseph had died...so it wasn't germane at the time of Joseph. But it is necessary today according to Scripture to verify a truth (2 Cor.13:1kjv).

Thousands believe they are one of these two witnesses but it must only lead to disappointment. Only those two who are the true two witnesses would only be happy to find out they were not. For those two do not look forward to such a position of responsibility toward mankind. Neither the trial they must endure to gain what God has ordained, but that they never sought.

Only those two who are the true two witnesses would only be happy to find out they were not. For those two do not look forward to such a position of responsibility toward mankind. Neither the trial they must endure to gain what God has ordained, but that they never sought

Hmmm you not only speak for yourself but for the other witness also now....hmmm interesting

Jesus’ priesthood wasn’t levitic....the levitic priesthood is an earthly priesthood. Jesus’ priesthood is melchelzedek . Even Jesus couldn’t be from 2 tribes. Jesus was only from the line of Judah through his mothers line so he could give David the sceptre in the end times. Jesus wants nothing to do with the levitic priesthood as that is separation of kingship and priesthood. Jesus has the higher melchelzedek priesthood in heaven where he can combine the two offices because the heavenly is always higher than the earthly

As far as my birthright it doesn’t come from you it comes from God you don’t yet realize you are the firstborn Adam and I am the second born. We were created on the 6th day and returned to earth in the 6000th year. You came forth and had a father which will give you the davidic bloodline to be from Judah.

Being I’m the 2nd born I came forth from you and am the other half of the Adam therefore like Jesus not having an earthly father he used his mothers fathers line for tribal lineage. When I was born you were away for a year and was raised in my mothers fathers house. My mothers father came from England which is the ephraim/joseph line therefore this is how I am from the line of Joseph.....but this probably will not register for you until our throne room visit...lol

John 8:

17 It is also written in your law, that the testimony of two men is true.

18 I am one that bear witness of myself, and the Father that sent me beareth witness of me.