| Users Online Now: 1,964 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,563,076 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,152,787 | Threads Today: 522 | Posts Today: 9,585 |
| 04:50 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,964 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,563,076 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,152,787 | Threads Today: 522 | Posts Today: 9,585 |
| 04:50 PM | ||
Earthquake watch next 72 hours due to asteroids Nov 7-8-9, 2013 | |
TheTruthWorker
(OP) User ID: 47014179  United States11/07/2013 09:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And Im betting we will have an X flare bigger than the one 10 years ago. No kill shot , but a record breaker. And it will be before the 15th. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17095177 I would agree but perhaps by Nov. 23rd. I firmly believe it is the solar connection that causes the quake-asteroid connection. It is not asteroids that trigger or influence quakes, it is the solar activity triggered by the asteroids... "electric universe" |
| TheTruthWorker
(OP) User ID: 47014179 United States11/07/2013 09:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| deanoZXT
User ID: 1287631 United States11/07/2013 09:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Simple27
User ID: 44334522 United States11/07/2013 09:44 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | GLP updated quake reports: Quoting: TheTruthWorker Thread: Earthquake Thread ~ Always Updated*5.0 South Sandwich Islands*5.0 Indonesia ~ Pg 20447   ~*Ride the Wave*~ |
| Simple27
User ID: 44334522 United States11/07/2013 09:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| TheTruthWorker
(OP) User ID: 47014179 United States11/07/2013 09:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 11 earthquakes in the past 30 days measuring 6-6.9 = a quake in that size region every 2.72 days on average, like it has been said, unless you can predict a 7+ then this theory is useless and pure coincidence. anyone can predict an earthquake under 7 in a 3 day window, you need to up your min magnitude to impress. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49621947 oh look, a 3 day window, how original. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49599832 Considering that is the average for a 6-6.9 magnitude earthquake i am sure you are going to get a hit. So let me say now, well done you!!! Since Aug. 31st covering 69 days: 35 quakes 6.0 or greater 100% chance of hit over 3 days 18 quakes 6.3 or greater 78% chance 14 quakes 6.5 or greater 61% chance 8 quakes 6.7 or greater 35% chance 4 quakes 7.0 or greater 17% chance So let's see if we get a 6.7 or greater |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49619247 United States11/07/2013 09:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 11 earthquakes in the past 30 days measuring 6-6.9 = a quake in that size region every 2.72 days on average, like it has been said, unless you can predict a 7+ then this theory is useless and pure coincidence. anyone can predict an earthquake under 7 in a 3 day window, you need to up your min magnitude to impress. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49621947 oh look, a 3 day window, how original. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49599832 Considering that is the average for a 6-6.9 magnitude earthquake i am sure you are going to get a hit. So let me say now, well done you!!! Since Aug. 31st covering 69 days: 35 quakes 6.0 or greater 100% chance of hit over 3 days 18 quakes 6.3 or greater 78% chance 14 quakes 6.5 or greater 61% chance 8 quakes 6.7 or greater 35% chance 4 quakes 7.0 or greater 17% chance So let's see if we get a 6.7 or greater usgs give an average of every 2.72 days from calculations over the years, emsc give the last 30 days as an average of 2.72 days, i would say that is close enough for the yearly average. look for yourself! last 30 days 6-6.9 = 11 events [link to www.emsc-csem.org] usgs 134 earthquakes per year 6-6.9 based on observations since 1900, 365/134 = 2.72 days on average. with a 3 day window, give yourself a hit!!! |
| TheTruthWorker
(OP) User ID: 47014179 United States11/07/2013 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Potential "doom" dates with CURRENT above average (highest) NEO daily counts. When count rises above 8... quake watch. (Sometimes the count rises AFTER the date) 11/09/13 -- 8 NEOs 11/11/13 -- 7 11/16/13 -- 8 12/06/13 -- 7 12/18/13 -- 7 01/07/14 -- 7 03/08/14 -- 7 03/16/14 -- 8 |
| TheTruthWorker
(OP) User ID: 47014179 United States11/07/2013 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 11 earthquakes in the past 30 days measuring 6-6.9 = a quake in that size region every 2.72 days on average, like it has been said, unless you can predict a 7+ then this theory is useless and pure coincidence. anyone can predict an earthquake under 7 in a 3 day window, you need to up your min magnitude to impress. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49621947 oh look, a 3 day window, how original. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49599832 Considering that is the average for a 6-6.9 magnitude earthquake i am sure you are going to get a hit. So let me say now, well done you!!! Since Aug. 31st covering 69 days: 35 quakes 6.0 or greater 100% chance of hit over 3 days 18 quakes 6.3 or greater 78% chance 14 quakes 6.5 or greater 61% chance 8 quakes 6.7 or greater 35% chance 4 quakes 7.0 or greater 17% chance So let's see if we get a 6.7 or greater usgs give an average of every 2.72 days from calculations over the years, emsc give the last 30 days as an average of 2.72 days, i would say that is close enough for the yearly average. look for yourself! last 30 days 6-6.9 = 11 events [link to www.emsc-csem.org] usgs 134 earthquakes per year 6-6.9 based on observations since 1900, 365/134 = 2.72 days on average. with a 3 day window, give yourself a hit!!! You are using stats for 6.0 to 6.9 Use 6.7+ It is statically pointless to predict quakes less than 6.7. I admit a 6.0 or greater over 3 days is like a 100% shot at getting a "hit". |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49621947 United States11/07/2013 10:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 11 earthquakes in the past 30 days measuring 6-6.9 = a quake in that size region every 2.72 days on average, like it has been said, unless you can predict a 7+ then this theory is useless and pure coincidence. anyone can predict an earthquake under 7 in a 3 day window, you need to up your min magnitude to impress. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 49621947 ... Quoting: TheTruthWorker Since Aug. 31st covering 69 days: 35 quakes 6.0 or greater 100% chance of hit over 3 days 18 quakes 6.3 or greater 78% chance 14 quakes 6.5 or greater 61% chance 8 quakes 6.7 or greater 35% chance 4 quakes 7.0 or greater 17% chance So let's see if we get a 6.7 or greater usgs give an average of every 2.72 days from calculations over the years, emsc give the last 30 days as an average of 2.72 days, i would say that is close enough for the yearly average. look for yourself! last 30 days 6-6.9 = 11 events [link to www.emsc-csem.org] usgs 134 earthquakes per year 6-6.9 based on observations since 1900, 365/134 = 2.72 days on average. with a 3 day window, give yourself a hit!!! You are using stats for 6.0 to 6.9 Use 6.7+ It is statically pointless to predict quakes less than 6.7. I admit a 6.0 or greater over 3 days is like a 100% shot at getting a "hit". ffs, your charts in post number 2 show quakes from 6.2, as most of your threads show you taking credit for '''hits''' at that and below that magnitude. so now it's 6.7 and above, well that is better but 7.5+ would make people think, not average 6's. |
| TheTruthWorker
(OP) User ID: 47014179 United States11/07/2013 10:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | usgs give an average of every 2.72 days from calculations over the years, emsc give the last 30 days as an average of 2.72 days, i would say that is close enough for the yearly average. look for yourself! last 30 days 6-6.9 = 11 events [link to www.emsc-csem.org] usgs 134 earthquakes per year 6-6.9 based on observations since 1900, 365/134 = 2.72 days on average. with a 3 day window, give yourself a hit!!! You are using stats for 6.0 to 6.9 Use 6.7+ It is statically pointless to predict quakes less than 6.7. I admit a 6.0 or greater over 3 days is like a 100% shot at getting a "hit". ffs, your charts in post number 2 show quakes from 6.2, as most of your threads show you taking credit for '''hits''' at that and below that magnitude. so now it's 6.7 and above, well that is better but 7.5+ would make people think, not average 6's. I go by CURRENT stats. OK... splain this chart Lucy: Chart 3: Quoting: TheTruthWorker Shows all 6.5+ quakes only +10 NEOs = 1 event 10 NEOs = 4 9 NEOs = 3 8 NEOs = 1 7 NEOs = 1 6 NEOs = 1 5 NEOs = 1 4 NEOs = 1 3 NEOs = 1 2 NEOs = 0   |
| TheTruthWorker
(OP) User ID: 47014179 United States11/07/2013 10:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | usgs give an average of every 2.72 days from calculations over the years, emsc give the last 30 days as an average of 2.72 days, i would say that is close enough for the yearly average. look for yourself! last 30 days 6-6.9 = 11 events [link to www.emsc-csem.org] usgs 134 earthquakes per year 6-6.9 based on observations since 1900, 365/134 = 2.72 days on average. with a 3 day window, give yourself a hit!!! You are using stats for 6.0 to 6.9 Use 6.7+ It is statically pointless to predict quakes less than 6.7. I admit a 6.0 or greater over 3 days is like a 100% shot at getting a "hit". ffs, your charts in post number 2 show quakes from 6.2, as most of your threads show you taking credit for '''hits''' at that and below that magnitude. so now it's 6.7 and above, well that is better but 7.5+ would make people think, not average 6's. I fully expect to get a quake big enough that gets a pinned GLP post. But you are trying to define what is a "hit" and I am happy with 6.7+ due to the odds of chance. If a 6.0+ quake hits I will report it in this thread but it has to be 6.7 of more to defy the odds of chance. |
| Simple27
User ID: 44334522 United States11/07/2013 10:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| TheTruthWorker
(OP) User ID: 47014179 United States11/07/2013 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Simple27
User ID: 44334522 United States11/07/2013 11:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not into quake predictions, but I must admit that I think OP is right Quoting: Simple27  And I hope OP is wrong Being accurate on this is not "doom" or a bad thing. Quakes happen all the time, even big ones, but usually cause little damage or deaths. No fear :) ~*Ride the Wave*~ |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 45414010 United States11/08/2013 08:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | MAG 5.2 YAP [link to quakes.globalincidentmap.com] |
| Simple27
User ID: 44334522 United States11/09/2013 02:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just wanted to post an update of all 4.0/4.0+ quakes since OP started this thread... Magnitude 5.7 Region SOUTHEAST OF LOYALTY ISLANDS Date time 2013-11-07 16:46:37.7 UTC Location 22.34 S ; 171.65 E Depth 102 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 5.1 Region OFFSHORE BIO-BIO, CHILE Date time 2013-11-07 17:01:06.0 UTC Location 37.61 S ; 73.76 W Depth 26 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.5 Region BANDA SEA Date time 2013-11-07 17:05:36.2 UTC Location 6.66 S ; 130.45 E Depth 86 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.7 Region CARLSBERG RIDGE Date time 2013-11-07 17:41:58.0 UTC Location 7.55 N ; 59.69 E Depth 10 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.5 Region VANUATU Date time 2013-11-07 17:21:06.0 UTC Location 16.09 S ; 168.42 E Depth 268 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 5.0 Region KEPULAUAN TALAUD, INDONESIA Date time 2013-11-07 18:38:51.5 UTC Location 4.32 N ; 126.51 E Depth 80 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.8 Region SOUTH OF PANAMA Date time 2013-11-07 18:49:15.5 UTC Location 4.70 N ; 82.68 W Depth 10 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.4 Region PAGAN REG., N. MARIANA ISLANDS Date time 2013-11-07 19:33:35.0 UTC Location 18.64 N ; 145.26 E Depth 447 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.1 Region TURKEY-IRAN BORDER REGION Date time 2013-11-07 20:03:22.0 UTC Location 38.26 N ; 44.67 E Depth 2 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 5.3 Region BOUGAINVILLE REGION, P.N.G. Date time 2013-11-07 20:13:50.3 UTC Location 6.45 S ; 154.98 E Depth 60 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.1 Region SOUTHERN IRAN Date time 2013-11-07 23:38:52.6 UTC Location 26.55 N ; 57.50 E Depth 12 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.3 Region SUMBAWA REGION, INDONESIA Date time 2013-11-08 00:16:48.0 UTC Location 8.99 S ; 117.83 E Depth 50 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.8 Region NORTHCENTRAL SIBERIA, RUSSIA Date time 2013-11-08 02:22:38.8 UTC Location 67.06 N ; 89.85 E Depth 10 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.6 Region SOUTH OF FIJI ISLANDS Date time 2013-11-08 02:11:27.0 UTC Location 22.23 S ; 179.67 W Depth 583 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.8 Region NEW IRELAND REGION, P.N.G. Date time 2013-11-08 03:25:11.0 UTC Location 5.86 S ; 153.45 E Depth 10 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.7 Region OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Date time 2013-11-08 10:46:55.0 UTC Location 41.21 N ; 125.17 W Depth 2 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.1 Region ANTOFAGASTA, CHILE Date time 2013-11-08 11:19:11.0 UTC Location 23.39 S ; 69.93 W Depth 30 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.7 Region JILIN, CHINA Date time 2013-11-08 11:37:18.0 UTC Location 44.60 N ; 124.11 E Depth 2 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.9 Region VANCOUVER ISLAND, CANADA REGION Date time 2013-11-08 11:44:59.0 UTC Location 50.29 N ; 129.70 W Depth 2 km Macroseismic Intensity F Effects: Felt [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.4 Region FIJI REGION Date time 2013-11-08 14:18:16.7 UTC Location 17.57 S ; 178.62 W Depth 557 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.0 Region ANTOFAGASTA, CHILE Date time 2013-11-08 14:35:46.0 UTC Location 22.23 S ; 68.60 W Depth 114 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.7 Region BANDA SEA Date time 2013-11-08 18:32:08.0 UTC Location 6.90 S ; 129.65 E Depth 106 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.0 Region SAN JUAN, ARGENTINA Date time 2013-11-08 19:51:17.0 UTC Location 31.66 S ; 69.72 W Depth 146 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.1 Region SALTA, ARGENTINA Date time 2013-11-08 19:59:09.0 UTC Location 24.26 S ; 67.27 W Depth 193 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 5.2 Region STATE OF YAP, MICRONESIA Date time 2013-11-09 00:20:50.0 UTC Location 8.06 N ; 137.79 E Depth 68 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.6 Region NORWEGIAN SEA Date time 2013-11-09 02:18:05.0 UTC Location 72.67 N ; 2.11 E Depth 2 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.9 Region SANTA CRUZ ISLANDS Date time 2013-11-09 03:45:21.0 UTC Location 12.00 S ; 167.13 E Depth 60 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.5 Region OFF EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN Date time 2013-11-09 05:03:21.0 UTC Location 39.99 N ; 143.43 E Depth 20 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.0 Region COQUIMBO, CHILE Date time 2013-11-09 05:34:00.0 UTC Location 30.42 S ; 71.54 W Depth 42 km [link to m.emsc.eu] Magnitude 4.9 Region PACIFIC-ANTARCTIC RIDGE Date time 2013-11-09 06:00:06.0 UTC Location 56.83 S ; 150.58 W Depth 10 km [link to m.emsc.eu] ~*Ride the Wave*~ |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49685207 United States11/09/2013 04:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Simple27
User ID: 44334522 United States11/09/2013 04:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49685338 United States11/09/2013 04:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just wanted to post an update of all 4.0/4.0+ quakes since OP started this thread... Quoting: Simple27 What the hell does all that have to do with this thread?! you need to do some research on earthquakes sweetcheeks!! Go fuck yourself wow, not so sweet. There are an average of 13000 4-4.9 each year = 35.5 quakes average PER DAY there are an average of 1319 5-59 each year = 3.6 quakes average PER DAY. I will ask again, what does that list have to do with truthworkers 6.7+ prediction???? you really do need to do some research. |
| Simple27
User ID: 44334522 United States11/09/2013 05:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ~*Ride the Wave*~ |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49687112 United States11/09/2013 05:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It had nothing to do with a 6.7+ quake. Obviously. I didn't say it did. What I said was here is a list of 4.0/4.0+ quakes since OP started the thread. That's all it was. Just that. But you had to be an asshole and turn it into something more. I was just posting what I said I was posting. That was all. Quoting: Simple27 I am not being an asshole at all, it is obvious you think you see an uptick in small earthquakes which you thought were relevent to truthworkers theory of asteroids affecting earth, that is why you posted that list. Like I said, please do some research, you will see that there is nothing unusual at all about the size and frequency of earthquakes we are getting. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 49748875 United States11/10/2013 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47814588  Netherlands11/10/2013 11:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 35037726  United Kingdom11/10/2013 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Due to above average number of NEOs approaching Earth on Nov. 7th and Nov. 9th I would not be surprised to see a significant earthquake (i.e. new quake with GLP pinned thread) hit within next 72 hours... based on past history of high NEO count days. Quoting: TheTruthWorker Date -- # of Day - Total - AU ----- Object 11/07/13 --- 1 --- 0 --- 0.4766 --- 142464 (2002 TC9) 11/07/13 --- 2 --- 0 --- 0.1378 --- (2013 TE6) 11/07/13 --- 3 --- 0 --- 0.2638 --- (2013 TS135) 11/07/13 --- 4 --- 0 --- 0.3759 --- (2011 MB2) 11/07/13 --- 5 --- 0 --- 0.4237 --- (2013 UG5) 11/07/13 --- 6 --- 0 --- 0.4727 --- (2012 HK31) 11/07/13 --- 7 --- 0 --- 0.0218 --- (2013 VH2) 11/07/13 --- 8 --- 0 --- 0.0795 --- (2013 RM43) 11/07/13 -- 9 --- 9 --- 0.0191 --- (2013 UE1) 11/08/13 --- 1 --- 0 --- 0.2474 --- (2013 TS4) 11/08/13 --- 2 --- 0 --- 0.0477 --- (2012 UV136) 11/08/13 --- 3 --- 0 --- 0.0689 --- (2013 RV9) 11/08/13 --- 4 --- 0 --- 0.3195 --- 169352 (2001 UY16) 11/08/13 -- 5 --- 5 --- 0.1816 --- (2007 TC66) 11/09/13 --- 1 --- 0 --- 0.2780 --- (2006 UL185) 11/09/13 --- 2 --- 0 --- 0.4521 --- (1998 VF32) 11/09/13 --- 3 --- 0 --- 0.2064 --- 250620 (2005 GE59) 11/09/13 --- 4 --- 0 --- 0.0834 --- (2013 TN69) 11/09/13 --- 5 --- 0 --- 0.1412 --- (2013 VJ2) 11/09/13 --- 6 --- 0 --- 0.3290 --- (2013 US3) 11/09/13 --- 7 --- 0 --- 0.1895 --- (2010 WG3) 11/09/13 -- 8 --- 8 --- 0.3160 --- (2013 GU66) Data Source: [link to neo.jpl.nasa.gov] it's the later part of the 10th nov dude and fuck all has happened, be careful about putting dates on things you know it never happens |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 2386245 United States11/10/2013 12:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21416459 United States11/10/2013 12:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| deanoZXT
User ID: 1287631 United States11/10/2013 02:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i think we all know where this thread is going.......... bottom of the list! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21416459 Well, now it's up top of the list. For a few minutes anyways. This thread and TheTruthWorker makes a lot more sense, and thought provoking connections then a ton of other junk threads on GLP. -Everything's more awesome when you lean into it. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 35037726 United Kingdom11/10/2013 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
