Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,465 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 133,015
Pageviews Today: 229,550Threads Today: 90Posts Today: 1,617
02:19 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

GATA Now Funded With Rothschilds’ Dirty Money- Censorship

 
WildFlower
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 49704208
United States
11/09/2013 02:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
GATA Now Funded With Rothschilds’ Dirty Money- Censorship
GATA (the “Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee”)-

It’s with a heavy heart that I write this commentary: the corruption of what was formerly an entity of information and truth. My own discovery of this dirty-little-secret came personally.

The very existence of the Rothschilds’, gigantic financial monopoly – which by itself “controls 40%” of the global economy – is illegal. It is a violation of our “anti-trust laws” (ironically the very laws which GATA seeks to have enforced), which are the principle foundation of our entire, capitalist economic system. Not surprisingly; the operators of this Crime Syndicate don’t want to see their illegal entity ever mentioned by any media source.

[link to bullionbullscanada.com]
WildFlower  (OP)

User ID: 49704208
United States
11/09/2013 04:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: GATA Now Funded With Rothschilds’ Dirty Money- Censorship
The basis for this sudden (and total) censorship of my commentaries? I was told that “one of GATA’s most significant individual supporters” had claimed that there were “anti-Semitic” undertones in one of my (more than 1,000) commentaries: “The One Bank”.

There are numerous problems with this false-accusation, beginning with the fact that none of my commentaries (including the one in question) ever mention the ethnicity of any individuals discussed, for the simple reason that this is “analysis” – and only relevant data is included in such analysis.

What, then, was the basis for this false-accusation? I simply used the name of a Jewish family – Rothschild – in one commentary. There was not a single reference to their ethnicity in the entire commentary. There was not a single reference to their ethnicity in any of the research material cited in that commentary. It’s like being accused of “homophobia” for simply mentioning the name of a gay individual, even though never revealing or alluding to their sexual orientation.

[link to bullionbullscanada.com]
WildFlower  (OP)

User ID: 39153982
United States
11/10/2013 08:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: GATA Now Funded With Rothschilds’ Dirty Money- Censorship
bump
ghost runner

User ID: 24911818
United States
07/11/2014 01:14 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: GATA Now Funded With Rothschilds’ Dirty Money- Censorship
bump





GLP