Sandy Hook 911 calls to be released

YES, maybe not all hope is lost..

YES, maybe not all hope is lost..



[/quot
I'm hoping they don't make us wait any longer and release it before Dec.4

It's amazing how in EVERY news article describing a false flag, they state the government official story as fact.

Gunfire erupted and killed 26 students.

There's never even a hint that the official story could possibly be in question.

Exactly and so many questions surround this hoax I'm not sure how people can just take everything they say as fact!

The judge said the calls are harrowing, but they do not identify any children, nor do they describe any injuries to a child.

"No children are identified by name. No caller indicates whether he or she could see whether any child has been injured," the judge wrote.

Sedensky also tried to justify the refusal to release the tapes by claiming that they are exempt from disclosure under a law that allows authorities to keep confidential signed witness statements in criminal investigations.

Confidential ehhh? Like Sally Cox's call? That you blacked out in your report?




"The plaintiff's claim borders on the frivolous," Prescott wrote.

friv·o·lous

~ not important ~ not deserving serious attention~ silly and not serious




The judge also concluded that the public interest would be served with blocking disclosure of the tapes. He flatly rejected Sedensky's claim that their release would have a chilling effect on those who might need to call 911.

"There is not factual or legal support for this claim," he wrote.

The judge acknowledged that the release of the tapes likely will be a reminder of the horror of the attack, but the reality is that the material eventually will be made public.

"The question is not if, but when," he wrote. "Further delaying their release will not ultimately serve to ameliorate the pain the recordings will likely cause to those directly impacted by the shootings."

"The judge also concluded that the public interest would be served with blocking disclosure of the tapes."

I hope that's a typo.

[link to www.ctmirror.org]

I want to hear Sally Cox's 911 call where she SAW the shooter!

I tipped the writer about the typo and he fixed it.

The judge also concluded that the public interest would not be served by blocking disclosure of the tapes. He flatly rejected Sedensky's claim that their release would have a chilling effect on those who might need to call 911.

Obama has proven it's OK to fabricate and forge where the interest of the state is concerned.

Ill believe that when i get to hear it.Ill bet the calls will be blocked before its over.

[Updated 4:15 p.m. PST, Nov. 26: The relatives of one victim, first-grade teacher Victoria Soto, reacted bitterly to Prescott’s decision in a statement posted on social media and directed at the judge. "We feel like our privacy has been invaded again," the statement said.

"We can only hope something of this magnitude never happens to you. Although I'm sure you are getting a slight glimpse into our world now, as you have been thrust in the spotlight. But your spotlight will fade; ours, unfortunately, will remain, and people who do not need to hear the audio from the day Vicki died will get their sick obsession fulfilled, all due to your decision."]


[link to www.latimes.com]

Privacy invaded?

The same family that whored themselves out to MSM/social networking/Anderson Cooper immediately after Vicki's apparently slain? The same mother claiming to have autopsy pictures? Worried about privacy?

Victoria Soto's mother isn't happy about Judge Prescott's decision:

[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]

Dear Superior Court Judge Eliot D. Prescott,

We are saddened to learn of your decision to release the 911 tapes from the day Vicki was taken from us. Perhaps you feel it is a public need to hear them, we feel like our privacy has been invaded again.

We are not sure if you are aware of the people who feed off this sort of thing. Do you know that? If this report has taught us anything it is that past incidents provide fuel and inspiration for possible future events. Did you think about that? Probably not.

We can only hope something of this magnitude never happens to you. Although I'm sure you are getting a slight glimpse into our world now, as you have been thrust in the spotlight. But your spotlight will fade, ours, unfortunately, will remain, and people who do not need to hear the audio from the day Vicki died will get their sick obsession fulfilled, all due to your decision.


She also posted 2 profile facebook accounts of people who are questioning Sandy Hook.

Exactly..

Viki Soto's Mother:

[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]


It has come to our attention that the people over on the "Sandy Hook Hoax" page are planning on coming over to Vicki's page and will commence "trolling" in order to disrupt us, simply because they think what happened at Sandy Hook was a hoax.

What is a surprise though, is that the comments are coming from someone in the US Army. We would have thought that respect would be the first thing they would be taught.


These are the people we deal with. We will not stand for it and we will not stop simply because you (unfathomably) think what happened is not real. We live this real life every single day. We are sorry you have no compassion or respect for other people, but we will NOT back down and we will continue on representing Vicki and carrying on her legacy.


Read the comments, all of her friends are telling Mrs. Soto to report this mentally unstable person to the FBI...

Last Edited by LadyK on 11/29/2013 04:34 AM