Could cell radiation be altering the water (towers) in any way? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50992052 United States 12/03/2013 04:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
armouredkitten
(OP) User ID: 49099850 United States 12/05/2013 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
armouredkitten
(OP) User ID: 49099850 United States 12/25/2013 06:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51940248 United States 12/25/2013 07:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
lightchild_uk
Waiting for IT User ID: 51900600 United Kingdom 12/25/2013 07:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A lot in the UK are concrete, but I do worry about it too. I suppose 90% of the microwaves will be going away, and the water would be probably be earthed. Just look at the warning signs [link to www.28dayslater.co.uk] Last Edited by lightchild_uk on 12/25/2013 07:18 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78260147 United States 07/26/2020 04:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 52982099 United States 07/26/2020 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79148955 United States 07/26/2020 10:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51752123 United States 07/26/2020 10:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is anybody else slightly concerned and/or curious as to the effects of cell antennas being place on water towers? Quoting: armouredkitten I just moved to new jersey a few months ago and couldn't help but notice the disgusting site of these nasty antennas on nearly every single water tower i've seen. Here's an article of what I'm talking about [link to www.mlive.com] Could cell radiation be altering the water in any way? I know that microwave frequencies heat water, but could that also in some way affect the molecular structure of the water itself? Or worse, the trace elements/fluoride and other shit that's in the water? I don’t think that just the RF radiation from the cell antennae has much, if any, effect on the water in the towers, but what about the modulated content of those radio waves, i.e., all those conversations taking place that are superimposed on them? Consider what is said during the average phone call. Overhearing people on their phones in public (most of whom seem not bothered a bit by the fact that others are within earshot) it’s fairly obvious that the vast majority of conversations aren’t centered on love, kindness and forbearance; truly, the exact opposite of those qualities makes up the usual fare. Anger, vituperation, small-mindedness, illicit affairs, criminal plans, selfishness, egotistical aims... to a greater or lesser extent, all these make up the lion’s share of conversations. All that electronified malice, impinging on or flowing through the water in the tanks. If, as the Japanese doctor claims, speaking a few words to water, with intent, changes its structure, what about a constant veritable torrent of them, mostly negative in content? All I’ll say is, I’m glad my water comes from a reservoir. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76509910 United States 07/26/2020 10:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79190517 Mexico 07/26/2020 10:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79091796 United States 07/26/2020 10:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78382004 Romania 07/27/2020 02:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The cell antennas mounted on water towers, are powerful directive antennas, that being said, it means the back lobe, that is the fascicle of the beam which radiate, suposedly in the water tower, it's the undesired effect and this radiation it's limited to maximum extent possible because is taking energy from the desired beam (front beam) which is the main business of an antenna. So, in the back these antennas will radiate cca 5% of their RF energy and some the effects, we believe it could, could be there, but very attenuated, as in case the entire RF energy would be bashing those. Now, water is a very "sensitive spiritual" matter, it has been used from old times for spells incantations, even for baptism, etc. It could be some nasty effects we don't know about, I do not know that sorts of knowledge. Another point, could be that for antennas they are mounting on water towers to be mounted - as per some generalized directive of some think-thanks desiring destruction of us - special types of antennas that could have higher leaks of RF energy, towards the water reservoir, but even then, not much than 7-8% residual RF energy towards water because otherwise it would burn the RF power booster so no feasible for the telecom companies. But with these satanic elites everything bad you could expect of, and as water is some daily human need what better and innocuous way to affect it, than that? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78382004 Romania 07/27/2020 03:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cell towers do not emit radiation, microwave towers do. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79091796 Cell towers are literal 'cell control towers', we do not need them for anything. I like to control my own cells. All of these above, emit electro-magnetic field of radio frequency, or shortly, radio frequency or RF radiation. Then there is nuclear radiation, of type alpha, beta and gamma, caused by the disintegration of atoms through the nuclear reactions, called nuclear radiation. So, over a threshold, both types of radiations have dangerous effects of biological life, of course of different natures, but all are bad... Though the RF radiation, which we were expecting in our environment, until the advent of these nasty frequencies of RF radiation for 5G systems (weren't tested almost at all the long term implication on human and animal lives) - weren't killing us so fast, as would have been some nuclear radiation of sorts (over the danger thresholds). So, RF (as used before 5G) it wouldn't be so nasty in effect as nuclear was. But now, with 50-60 GHz used in 5G, nobody knows for sure, but we can believe is harmful using the knowledge, same FQ were used in direct energy weapons to take out metal targets (planes, tanks, satellites) and people as well. Not only because they would have been jammed and interfered those military vehicles automotive and control electronics, but by literally melting, dis integrating some important parts of it (imagine the effect of microwave oven, not being restricted in the oven volume, but somehow focused and concentrated into a bea; that hits something or somebody). Personally I'm really concerned that these 50-60% are very nasty for our health and the fact that 5G technology towers and antennas need to be raised during these lock-downs it's a clear sign that the elites are well aware the dangerous effect of those. Even because the level of energy radiated in 5G, has to be ten times (folds) higher than the traditional 2,3 and 4G technology, simple because the high attenuation of such RF energy because of water particles in humidity atmosphere, tree leaves, etc (simple physics). So, the number of emitters must be much elevated and the antennas will be closer to everyone, everywhere, to be functional. As well, I read on Deborah Tavares site, that there is embedded a weapon-like feature in the 5G systems, that could be triggered of them at will. Such, they can use the system for sometime, no bad perceptibly effects, but when they need they activated this feature and they can take out people in the areas where they desired (it could be used localized). It can even pin-point a single person to destroy, because the 5G technology use the Beam forming technology, shooting from antenna a beam directly towards your cell phone (which usually people use near their heads) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78252594 United States 07/28/2020 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |