|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Skinning Schroedigers Cat
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Sinclair |
|
Post Content
|
Layman's terms would probably net your thread a lot more feedback. Not everyone here is well versed in quantum vocabulary.
Remember your audience.
Anyway, thanks for the link.
Quoting: Sinclair Lol, I just talk to myself most of the time anyway. Essentially, as a function of measure, we are cutting up awareness (filtering it) into a package which fits our desired awareness. Imagine your dreams being the parts which snuck by your filters. The filter, as measureable construct, is a cube or square to make matters simpler. The square or cube can be measured with no uncertainty. It is a definitive sum. In its movement Outward and in rotation it takes up a spherical or arced basis and with that becomes immeasureable as a defined or definitive space. In short, function is not only form, but awareness and in totality conciousness. Cheers Lol I hear ya. But you never know, some people might really like this stuff. The complexity can turn lots off though. Nevertheless, it's an interesting article. The idea of using a method of "weak measurement" is pretty ingenious. Unfortunately, like they state, despite it narrowing the scope of the uncertainty it still remains exactly that; an uncertainty. Seems like a step in the right direction though. I wonder if there could be an indirect way to measure it. Sort of like the idea in the movie "Inception", where the measurement is stimulated into revealing itself. In the movie, they tricked the person into generating his own thought. Perhaps there's a way to do something similar with the cat in the box. Either way, just seems to me like a bit of a wall that cant be gotten through and we need to manage to find a way around it. One thing is for certain though - it's good they're not resigning themselves to the idea that it can't be done.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
