UFOs Pounding Military Base In Texas | |
First Born
User ID: 28375544 United States 03/01/2014 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | After a particularly strong thunderstorm hit the area, this was all over the news: [link to www.star-telegram.com] Today Show: [link to www.nbcnews.com] [link to www.npr.org] And a better video: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53636552 Argentina 03/01/2014 02:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Useless Cookie Eater
(OP) User ID: 29696048 United States 03/01/2014 02:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Useless Cookie Eater Then show the moving light source. You can't just make it up to fit your theory if it doesn't exist. You mean the big bright flashes happening at random points over a large area? You do see that, right? But just for fun, and I know you won't do it, pick one of these points in the sky and track it's luminosity/duration to a point on the ground. EVERY appearing and disappearing light coincides with a flash on the ground. No need to make anything up. It's all in the video. Stop being so desperate to believe. You are throwing all objectivity out the window. Your MOVING LIGHT SOURCE is not separate independent flashes of light...which is what is going on...on the ground. ....and if it were... 1) Where are the moving objects on the ground to coincide with the sky? 2) Why does it not happen for EVERY flash? Theory fail. 1. Watch any part of the video where it appears one of the lights is moving. You will be able to draw a line directly from the movement on the ground to the movement on the sky. If may not be directly under the light in the sky, so track the ground for the mirror. Not sure how to make it much easier than this. 2. Why would it? It's all about the angles of the light source hitting the camera or reflective object. The camera is moving quite a bit, but you will notice that the lights in the sky happen in groups as the cameraman is either moving the camera, or has temporarily settled on a space. Again...(and I have watched many times) 1) I see no consistent ground movement that corresponds to movement where the UFO's are. 2) There is no "one for one" match for each flash to each sky object that is seen....not even close. ...especially for something that goes on FOR HOURS. Every flash WILL have a reflection....if in fact it was actually reflecting objects in the sky. Sorry. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 142629 New Zealand 03/01/2014 02:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
\\'hyte \\'olf
User ID: 47934645 United States 03/01/2014 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry to bust the bubble here but this video is nothing more then part of the light show from something that is happrning at the Fort Worth convention center that is located right beside that tall building in down town Fort Worth. Quoting: Jango Mfwic Just google map Fort Worth Texas and notice the huge convention center with the dome that OPENS and closes. Case closed Once again....look on google maps. It is the lights from the damn event that was taking place at the Fort Worth convention center. All it takes is a little investigating and logic combined. Explain all the lights in the sky WITHOUT referring to something stupid like Cloud Reflection or Airliners from DFW or a LIGHT SHOW. And if it were transformers blowing or a LIGHT SHOW, WHY IS THERE NO SOUND OF EXPLOSIONS? I hear birds and traffic and crickets...NO EXPLOSIONS. I know what a transformer blowing sounds like and you could hear it from half a mile. As far as a Light Show, it does not explain the lights in the sky at all... "I Will Limit Your Access To My Reality..." :WhyteWolf: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54547270 United States 03/01/2014 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54547270 Moving light source on the ground. You can literally draw lines from the source of light on the ground to the lights in the sky. Intensity and duration directly match a source on the ground. Now show me one of these ufos that made an appearance without any flashing lights on the ground. So you are suggestion that these lights are reflections from cloud cover? Excuse me while I laugh... The term you are looking for is called REFRACTION. Clouds can not and do not reflect light in such a manner. The refraction will be obscure (Obscured by Clouds - Great PF ALBUM) and not in any form like these. The only thing closely to what you describe is called a Sun Dog and last time I checked...the video was shot at night... What the hell are you talking about? I never suggested the clouds had ANYTHING to do with this event. The REFLECTION I am speaking of is coming off of either a pane in the window he is shooting through, or something inside the apartment bouncing back to the window. Or just a good old fashioned lens flare. Lens Flare is OUT. There is no congruity with the other light sources to the lights in the sky. As far as the Window Pane theory....you can clearly hear the birds, traffic and crickets in the background...it was shot OUTSIDE... As far as the REFLECTION part, I BOLDED the part where you make a comparison. I could only assume that you meant reflection from a cloud source. Your Idea of airliners is close but still no cigar. Airliners have constant lighting and the lights are not unidirectional from the wings nor the fuselage. The only time airliners use unidirectional lights is on take off and landing...I live 2 miles from a major airport... You have zero, ZERO evidence that this was taken outside. All of the outdoor noises that are heard can easily be explained by a nearby open door or window. Again, without knowing the layout of the space, there is little to argue. You don't even know if the building he is in has an outdoor space! He is easily 15+ stories above street level. How common are balconies that high up? And no, once again I have said absolutely nothing about cloud reflection OR airliners. |
Integrity101
User ID: 41058692 United States 03/01/2014 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was there... it happened in FORT WORTH... Quoting: First Born After a particularly strong thunderstorm hit the area, this was all over the news: [link to www.star-telegram.com] Today Show: [link to www.nbcnews.com] [link to www.npr.org] And a better video: Thanks. |
Useless Cookie Eater
(OP) User ID: 29696048 United States 03/01/2014 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's interesting that you bring this OLD news up now, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53636552 Blue Beam much ? fuck you mason. go ahead and fuck yourself I bring it up because I saw the article last night and never saw this video before....apparently neither have a lot of other people. Very unusual set of circumstances in the video.....worthy of a GLP discussion. So get a grip dude. ...and go mason yourself in the head with a clay pot. . Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/01/2014 02:26 PM |
Useless Cookie Eater
(OP) User ID: 29696048 United States 03/01/2014 02:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was there... it happened in FORT WORTH... Quoting: First Born After a particularly strong thunderstorm hit the area, this was all over the news: [link to www.star-telegram.com] Today Show: [link to www.nbcnews.com] [link to www.npr.org] And a better video: Thanks. Yeah...that was a great video too showing the UFO's as well. ...and the MSM story line was great too. Kind of like the lie about the California missile that wasn't a missile. |
Stoned Goddess
User ID: 51275820 Canada 03/01/2014 02:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54547270 United States 03/01/2014 02:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54547270 You mean the big bright flashes happening at random points over a large area? You do see that, right? But just for fun, and I know you won't do it, pick one of these points in the sky and track it's luminosity/duration to a point on the ground. EVERY appearing and disappearing light coincides with a flash on the ground. No need to make anything up. It's all in the video. Stop being so desperate to believe. You are throwing all objectivity out the window. Your MOVING LIGHT SOURCE is not separate independent flashes of light...which is what is going on...on the ground. ....and if it were... 1) Where are the moving objects on the ground to coincide with the sky? 2) Why does it not happen for EVERY flash? Theory fail. 1. Watch any part of the video where it appears one of the lights is moving. You will be able to draw a line directly from the movement on the ground to the movement on the sky. If may not be directly under the light in the sky, so track the ground for the mirror. Not sure how to make it much easier than this. 2. Why would it? It's all about the angles of the light source hitting the camera or reflective object. The camera is moving quite a bit, but you will notice that the lights in the sky happen in groups as the cameraman is either moving the camera, or has temporarily settled on a space. Again...(and I have watched many times) 1) I see no consistent ground movement that corresponds to movement where the UFO's are. 2) There is no "one for one" match for each flash to each sky object that is seen....not even close. ...especially for something that goes on FOR HOURS. Every flash WILL have a reflection....if in fact it was actually reflecting objects in the sky. Sorry. 1. Look harder. It's clearly there. Just focus on ONE "ufo" from it's appearance to disappearance. If you can't see a corresponding light on the ground, then you aren't watching the same video. 2. Please post a credible source that this went on for hours. I've seen nothing other than you and the original video claim this, but there is nothing to back it up. And no, the reflections aren't coming off of objects in the sky, and I already explained why it isn't a one for one reflection in the post you just replied to. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55012406 United States 03/01/2014 02:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Useless Cookie Eater
(OP) User ID: 29696048 United States 03/01/2014 02:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Useless Cookie Eater Your MOVING LIGHT SOURCE is not separate independent flashes of light...which is what is going on...on the ground. ....and if it were... 1) Where are the moving objects on the ground to coincide with the sky? 2) Why does it not happen for EVERY flash? Theory fail. 1. Watch any part of the video where it appears one of the lights is moving. You will be able to draw a line directly from the movement on the ground to the movement on the sky. If may not be directly under the light in the sky, so track the ground for the mirror. Not sure how to make it much easier than this. 2. Why would it? It's all about the angles of the light source hitting the camera or reflective object. The camera is moving quite a bit, but you will notice that the lights in the sky happen in groups as the cameraman is either moving the camera, or has temporarily settled on a space. Again...(and I have watched many times) 1) I see no consistent ground movement that corresponds to movement where the UFO's are. 2) There is no "one for one" match for each flash to each sky object that is seen....not even close. ...especially for something that goes on FOR HOURS. Every flash WILL have a reflection....if in fact it was actually reflecting objects in the sky. Sorry. 1. Look harder. It's clearly there. Just focus on ONE "ufo" from it's appearance to disappearance. If you can't see a corresponding light on the ground, then you aren't watching the same video. 2. Please post a credible source that this went on for hours. I've seen nothing other than you and the original video claim this, but there is nothing to back it up. And no, the reflections aren't coming off of objects in the sky, and I already explained why it isn't a one for one reflection in the post you just replied to. You are entitled to your opinion dude....but I've already considered and discarded what you are STILL considering. It doesn't match "one for one" sorry....nor are there ground objects working in unison with the aerial objects. ...colors of the light flashes don't even match ground to air. Sorry. Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/01/2014 02:35 PM |
davvi
User ID: 3677166 United States 03/01/2014 02:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46203780 United States 03/01/2014 02:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54547270 United States 03/01/2014 02:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54547270 1. Watch any part of the video where it appears one of the lights is moving. You will be able to draw a line directly from the movement on the ground to the movement on the sky. If may not be directly under the light in the sky, so track the ground for the mirror. Not sure how to make it much easier than this. 2. Why would it? It's all about the angles of the light source hitting the camera or reflective object. The camera is moving quite a bit, but you will notice that the lights in the sky happen in groups as the cameraman is either moving the camera, or has temporarily settled on a space. Again...(and I have watched many times) 1) I see no consistent ground movement that corresponds to movement where the UFO's are. 2) There is no "one for one" match for each flash to each sky object that is seen....not even close. ...especially for something that goes on FOR HOURS. Every flash WILL have a reflection....if in fact it was actually reflecting objects in the sky. Sorry. 1. Look harder. It's clearly there. Just focus on ONE "ufo" from it's appearance to disappearance. If you can't see a corresponding light on the ground, then you aren't watching the same video. 2. Please post a credible source that this went on for hours. I've seen nothing other than you and the original video claim this, but there is nothing to back it up. And no, the reflections aren't coming off of objects in the sky, and I already explained why it isn't a one for one reflection in the post you just replied to. You are entitled to your opinion dude....but I've already considered and discarded what you are STILL considering. It doesn't match "one for one" sorry....nor are there ground objects working in unison with the aerial objects. ...colors of the light flashes don't even match ground to air. Sorry. Again, pick a point in the sky that lights up. Note its duration, then find the correlating light on the ground. It happens on EVERY burst that has a "ufo". I know you aren't one of the brightest bulbs here at GLP, but FFS have a little skepticism when it comes to this kind of thing. |
viraja
User ID: 55022114 United States 03/01/2014 02:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54913927 United States 03/01/2014 02:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was there... it happened in FORT WORTH... Quoting: First Born After a particularly strong thunderstorm hit the area, this was all over the news: [link to www.star-telegram.com] Today Show: [link to www.nbcnews.com] [link to www.npr.org] And a better video: Thanks. Yeah...that was a great video too showing the UFO's as well. ...and the MSM story line was great too. Kind of like the lie about the California missile that wasn't a missile. [link to www.google.com (secure)] Like the norway missile. |
Useless Cookie Eater
(OP) User ID: 29696048 United States 03/01/2014 02:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nothing else goes out besides one string on the base. EXCESSIVE amount of transformers even if that was plausible......THIS WENT ON FOR HOURS. There is so much we don't know and the really sad part is most don't want to know... As far as technology goes....we are barely in the embryonic stage as a civilization. Other civilizations have had 1000's, millions or even a billion years head start on us. Mind boggling what they can do at this point To think we are alone in the universe is foolish. Ask ANY of the astronauts....especially on the Apollo and Shuttle programs. Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/01/2014 02:43 PM |
\\'hyte \\'olf
User ID: 47934645 United States 03/01/2014 02:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: \\'hyte \\'olf So you are suggestion that these lights are reflections from cloud cover? Excuse me while I laugh... The term you are looking for is called REFRACTION. Clouds can not and do not reflect light in such a manner. The refraction will be obscure (Obscured by Clouds - Great PF ALBUM) and not in any form like these. The only thing closely to what you describe is called a Sun Dog and last time I checked...the video was shot at night... What the hell are you talking about? I never suggested the clouds had ANYTHING to do with this event. The REFLECTION I am speaking of is coming off of either a pane in the window he is shooting through, or something inside the apartment bouncing back to the window. Or just a good old fashioned lens flare. Lens Flare is OUT. There is no congruity with the other light sources to the lights in the sky. As far as the Window Pane theory....you can clearly hear the birds, traffic and crickets in the background...it was shot OUTSIDE... As far as the REFLECTION part, I BOLDED the part where you make a comparison. I could only assume that you meant reflection from a cloud source. Your Idea of airliners is close but still no cigar. Airliners have constant lighting and the lights are not unidirectional from the wings nor the fuselage. The only time airliners use unidirectional lights is on take off and landing...I live 2 miles from a major airport... You have zero, ZERO evidence that this was taken outside. All of the outdoor noises that are heard can easily be explained by a nearby open door or window. Again, without knowing the layout of the space, there is little to argue. You don't even know if the building he is in has an outdoor space! He is easily 15+ stories above street level. How common are balconies that high up? And no, once again I have said absolutely nothing about cloud reflection OR airliners. You have your opinion, I will stick with what is given. Do me a favor....make a video at the same time of night with a door or window open as proof. Otherwise you are speculating. I know what I HEAR and I HEAR outside video... Bring to the table PROOF of your claim or your argument is folly... All you are doing is speculating what happened. Bring proof or do not bother me with a reply... "I Will Limit Your Access To My Reality..." :WhyteWolf: |
Useless Cookie Eater
(OP) User ID: 29696048 United States 03/01/2014 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I was there... it happened in FORT WORTH... Quoting: First Born After a particularly strong thunderstorm hit the area, this was all over the news: [link to www.star-telegram.com] Today Show: [link to www.nbcnews.com] [link to www.npr.org] And a better video: Thanks. Yeah...that was a great video too showing the UFO's as well. ...and the MSM story line was great too. Kind of like the lie about the California missile that wasn't a missile. [link to www.google.com (secure)] Like the norway missile. Yep....that was a lie to cover up something too. No missile trail looks like that. That Cali thing though was a missile....but they didn't want to scare the public that the Chinese just shot a missile from a sub off the Cali coast. Mass panic would have ensued. Just like the video at the beginning of this thread.....SOMETHING is going on....and it's not the MSM cover story of a "thunderstorm". It doesn't add up. Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/01/2014 02:46 PM |
\\'hyte \\'olf
User ID: 47934645 United States 03/01/2014 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54547270 What the hell are you talking about? I never suggested the clouds had ANYTHING to do with this event. The REFLECTION I am speaking of is coming off of either a pane in the window he is shooting through, or something inside the apartment bouncing back to the window. Or just a good old fashioned lens flare. Lens Flare is OUT. There is no congruity with the other light sources to the lights in the sky. As far as the Window Pane theory....you can clearly hear the birds, traffic and crickets in the background...it was shot OUTSIDE... As far as the REFLECTION part, I BOLDED the part where you make a comparison. I could only assume that you meant reflection from a cloud source. Your Idea of airliners is close but still no cigar. Airliners have constant lighting and the lights are not unidirectional from the wings nor the fuselage. The only time airliners use unidirectional lights is on take off and landing...I live 2 miles from a major airport... You have zero, ZERO evidence that this was taken outside. All of the outdoor noises that are heard can easily be explained by a nearby open door or window. Again, without knowing the layout of the space, there is little to argue. You don't even know if the building he is in has an outdoor space! He is easily 15+ stories above street level. How common are balconies that high up? And no, once again I have said absolutely nothing about cloud reflection OR airliners. You have your opinion, I will stick with what is given. Do me a favor....make a video at the same time of night with a door or window open as proof. Otherwise you are speculating. I know what I HEAR and I HEAR outside video... Bring to the table PROOF of your claim or your argument is folly... All you are doing is speculating what happened. Bring proof or do not bother me with a reply... In addition, you have ZERO evidence this was taken INSIDE. "I Will Limit Your Access To My Reality..." :WhyteWolf: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54547270 United States 03/01/2014 02:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54547270 What the hell are you talking about? I never suggested the clouds had ANYTHING to do with this event. The REFLECTION I am speaking of is coming off of either a pane in the window he is shooting through, or something inside the apartment bouncing back to the window. Or just a good old fashioned lens flare. Lens Flare is OUT. There is no congruity with the other light sources to the lights in the sky. As far as the Window Pane theory....you can clearly hear the birds, traffic and crickets in the background...it was shot OUTSIDE... As far as the REFLECTION part, I BOLDED the part where you make a comparison. I could only assume that you meant reflection from a cloud source. Your Idea of airliners is close but still no cigar. Airliners have constant lighting and the lights are not unidirectional from the wings nor the fuselage. The only time airliners use unidirectional lights is on take off and landing...I live 2 miles from a major airport... You have zero, ZERO evidence that this was taken outside. All of the outdoor noises that are heard can easily be explained by a nearby open door or window. Again, without knowing the layout of the space, there is little to argue. You don't even know if the building he is in has an outdoor space! He is easily 15+ stories above street level. How common are balconies that high up? And no, once again I have said absolutely nothing about cloud reflection OR airliners. You have your opinion, I will stick with what is given. Do me a favor....make a video at the same time of night with a door or window open as proof. Otherwise you are speculating. I know what I HEAR and I HEAR outside video... Bring to the table PROOF of your claim or your argument is folly... All you are doing is speculating what happened. Bring proof or do not bother me with a reply... Both of us are speculating, and without knowing more about the building/unit it was shot in, there is very little to go off. However, the glass shaking in front of the camera at multiple spots in the video is pretty good evidence on my side. Your "proof" can be explained away by an open window. Mine cannot be as easily dismissed. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54547270 United States 03/01/2014 02:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: \\'hyte \\'olf Lens Flare is OUT. There is no congruity with the other light sources to the lights in the sky. As far as the Window Pane theory....you can clearly hear the birds, traffic and crickets in the background...it was shot OUTSIDE... As far as the REFLECTION part, I BOLDED the part where you make a comparison. I could only assume that you meant reflection from a cloud source. Your Idea of airliners is close but still no cigar. Airliners have constant lighting and the lights are not unidirectional from the wings nor the fuselage. The only time airliners use unidirectional lights is on take off and landing...I live 2 miles from a major airport... You have zero, ZERO evidence that this was taken outside. All of the outdoor noises that are heard can easily be explained by a nearby open door or window. Again, without knowing the layout of the space, there is little to argue. You don't even know if the building he is in has an outdoor space! He is easily 15+ stories above street level. How common are balconies that high up? And no, once again I have said absolutely nothing about cloud reflection OR airliners. You have your opinion, I will stick with what is given. Do me a favor....make a video at the same time of night with a door or window open as proof. Otherwise you are speculating. I know what I HEAR and I HEAR outside video... Bring to the table PROOF of your claim or your argument is folly... All you are doing is speculating what happened. Bring proof or do not bother me with a reply... In addition, you have ZERO evidence this was taken INSIDE. Except for a shaking window directly in front of the camera. |
Useless Cookie Eater
(OP) User ID: 29696048 United States 03/01/2014 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54547270 You have zero, ZERO evidence that this was taken outside. All of the outdoor noises that are heard can easily be explained by a nearby open door or window. Again, without knowing the layout of the space, there is little to argue. You don't even know if the building he is in has an outdoor space! He is easily 15+ stories above street level. How common are balconies that high up? And no, once again I have said absolutely nothing about cloud reflection OR airliners. You have your opinion, I will stick with what is given. Do me a favor....make a video at the same time of night with a door or window open as proof. Otherwise you are speculating. I know what I HEAR and I HEAR outside video... Bring to the table PROOF of your claim or your argument is folly... All you are doing is speculating what happened. Bring proof or do not bother me with a reply... In addition, you have ZERO evidence this was taken INSIDE. Except for a shaking window directly in front of the camera. There is no shaking window. Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/01/2014 02:53 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 800208 Canada 03/01/2014 02:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are entitled to your opinion dude....but I've already considered and discarded what you are STILL considering. Quoting: Useless Cookie Eater It doesn't match "one for one" sorry....nor are there ground objects working in unison with the aerial objects. ...colors of the light flashes don't even match ground to air. Sorry. Well Cookie since it;s well known by all that we didn't go to the Moon, just how did the UFOs get through the deadly Van Halen Bands? |
Useless Cookie Eater
(OP) User ID: 29696048 United States 03/01/2014 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You are entitled to your opinion dude....but I've already considered and discarded what you are STILL considering. Quoting: Useless Cookie Eater It doesn't match "one for one" sorry....nor are there ground objects working in unison with the aerial objects. ...colors of the light flashes don't even match ground to air. Sorry. Well Cookie since it;s well known by all that we didn't go to the Moon, just how did the UFOs get through the deadly Van Halen Bands? Sorry...not part of this thread or topic. |
Useless Cookie Eater
(OP) User ID: 29696048 United States 03/01/2014 02:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nothing else goes out besides one string on the base. EXCESSIVE amount of transformers even if that was plausible......THIS WENT ON FOR HOURS. There is so much we don't know and the really sad part is most don't want to know... As far as technology goes....we are barely in the embryonic stage as a civilization. Other civilizations have had 1000's, millions or even a billion years head start on us. Mind boggling what they can do at this point To think we are alone in the universe is foolish. Ask ANY of the astronauts....especially on the Apollo and Shuttle programs. for AC 800208 to ponder . Last Edited by Useless Cookie Eater on 03/01/2014 02:56 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54547270 United States 03/01/2014 02:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: \\'hyte \\'olf You have your opinion, I will stick with what is given. Do me a favor....make a video at the same time of night with a door or window open as proof. Otherwise you are speculating. I know what I HEAR and I HEAR outside video... Bring to the table PROOF of your claim or your argument is folly... All you are doing is speculating what happened. Bring proof or do not bother me with a reply... In addition, you have ZERO evidence this was taken INSIDE. Except for a shaking window directly in front of the camera. There is no shaking window. :grnrolleyes: 17-22 seconds. Notice the light in the air with a bit of a shake yet nothing else in frame exhibits this behavior? That's a reflection jumping around due to a shaking window. You can deny it all you want, but this happens at multiple times in the video. Unless you have a simpler explanation? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 800208 Canada 03/01/2014 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Useless Cookie Eater Nothing else goes out besides one string on the base. EXCESSIVE amount of transformers even if that was plausible......THIS WENT ON FOR HOURS. There is so much we don't know and the really sad part is most don't want to know... As far as technology goes....we are barely in the embryonic stage as a civilization. Other civilizations have had 1000's, millions or even a billion years head start on us. Mind boggling what they can do at this point To think we are alone in the universe is foolish. Ask ANY of the astronauts....especially on the Apollo and Shuttle programs. for AC 800208 to ponder . |