Sandy Hook II: Flight MH370 just became an official, colossal coverup.

Give it a rest and get a life.

It was this magnificent THING

It was this magnificent EBT shill cointelpro THING!!!!

Were you the 1 startard?
If you're in the US, could I ask you to please not reproduce? Thx.

Compare the families though. That's one HUGE difference

Note the bizarre phrasing being used consistently: the flight "ended."

Huh? Since when do we refer to crashes as flights simply "ending?"

CYA for something.

I swear there is a visible pattern observable in these two cover-ups...not because I think some mysterious cabal is at the helm, but simply because in both cases, lawyers and other experts hired for CYA duty are giving similar advice.

Sandy Hook: "The shooter is never referred to by name." "They won't utter his name." And in the report, 7000 pages referring, almost without exception, not to the actions of "Adam Lanza" but simply, "the shooter."

CYA.

MH370: "The flight ended in the Indian Ocean." "Data showed the plane had ended it's journey." "We have to assume that beyond any reasonable doubt flight MH379 has been lost."

Been lost? We KNOW it has been lost. We want to hear you say, Prime Minister, with your own lips, "Flight MH370 crashed into the sea."

And I want to hear Newtown officials say, "Adam Lanza, acting alone, opened fire in Rooms 8 and 10."

I have always suspected, however, that much if not all of the "angry Chinese relatives" spectacle is just Beijing pulling strings. I would guess from these displays that President Xi is very much out of the loop as to what really happened, and is pissed the Brits and Yanks are keeping it from him. Keeping the "relatives" stoked up (notice a few of the same people are always prominently visible in the photos--may not even be relatives) allows Beijing to say the public is demanding information.

Note, too, this strange not-quite-parallel:

"I suppose I want to see something from the seas," said Bimal Sharma, an Indian man whose sister Chandrika was on the plane. "I don't know why I just want to see some debris off the aircraft and the black box to know what exactly happened because there are too many unanswered questions."

[link to www.cnn.com]

But if you need see Sandy Hook evidence, to answer lingering questions, you're a "ghoul" etc.

I'm waiting for the day when they make an entire town disappear. Just cease to exist.

Some people would question why a fully functioning town with people, stores, and businesses just vaporized: they would be considered "conspiracy theorists" or "tin foil nutcases." Most people wouldn't even question it. They'd just learn to believe that the town never existed and not breath a word otherwise. The burden of proof of what they're told by Govermedia would be zero. Compartmentalization in its most advanced form.

Sandy Hook and MH370 are likely crude trial runs of what we can expect more of in The Brave New World. Scary.

This video is even more telling if you watch it with the sound off. Nobody is grieving in this video.

This is why we need open-records law to be sacrosanct, with stiff penalties for officials who obstruct justice.

Great quote from same CNN article above:


"CNN Aviation Analyst Miles O'Brien said he wanted to see more information about what was behind Malaysian authorities' announcement.
"There is a saying in science: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence," he said. "Show me. Show me the evidence."

Very oddly, CNN has decided to bring up the Uyghur thing--again.

[link to www.cnn.com]

I keeping with the CYA tack of aiding specificities, note how the Uyhgur man's Chinese friend allegedly sees him in all kinds of situations but does not take him to the airport due to a last-minute "mood-souring" over the Xijiang Uyghur incident. I.e this friend cannt be held accountable for saying the Uyghur man absolutely, positively got into flight MH370.

I also think there's something odd about the painting they chose, allegedly from me Uyghur painter's collection.

Note how all faces but one are a very washed, watercolor tone. The one exception is the man who appears to be smiling (who actually looks very Tibetan rather than Uyghur), with e black hat, facing the painter.

I think is man stands apartheid in three ways: 1) He is the only one absolutely smiling, 2) he is the only one with brighter, more vivid colors instead of softer watercolor wash, and 3) he is notably more Asian as opposed to Middle Eastern in appearance.

The scene is of the destruction of some old city--possibly Kashgar. The destruction of Uyghur land and towns, against the will of the people, is a consistent (if hushed) topic in Turkestan aka Sinkiang aka Xinjiang.

What happens if you remove the black hat man and consider the picture again? I think it looks a lot less cheery, maybe even a bit melancholy. Uyghur families--men and women of many ages--watching the destruction of something, not smiling. It almost seems as if they are on an island of remaining concrete steps, in a sea of destruction.

The CCP is notorious for Photoshopping people and objects in ways that better serve its twisted propaganda (I.e, "Look, happy Uyghur people smiling about progress!)

Sorry, "the CYA tack of avoiding specificities..."

ha

good one

If you look at the same painting on a different site the colours are far more vibrant and are not so washed-out. [link to beigewind.wordpress.com]

Maybe investigators should demolish the plane if found and seal all the records. That's how it works in America now.

We have no reason to believe the passengers are deceased.

No evidence of this.

If you hear that a certain town in Pakistan is being "pulverized and melted down," that's the first clue.

So then what about the passengers?

@ Classic Carverism!

Magnificent THING, FTW!

If there's a reason good enough to hide the aircraft, I doubt any major force (government or otherwise) would let conscience stop them from killing the passengers.

But the honest truth is we have almost zero clue who was really on that plane. Some of the people China claimed were on the plane ("Uyghur terrorists") have already shown up on the ground, and never took the flight.