Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,607 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 472,244
Pageviews Today: 722,717Threads Today: 271Posts Today: 3,665
08:17 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58184757
Belgium
05/17/2014 11:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
If there was any doubt about the nature of materialistic science - materialistic science at the service of the state in particular - there can no longer be. It has spent much effort for a long time to convince us that there is no such thing as hell, and very effectively so. But what appears now ? It appears that scientists may be going to (but in all likelihood will) apply the knowledge of the physical universe science has gathered for centuries to CREATE A HELL OF ITS OWN.

Remember - first, "there is no hell and religion is nonsense"; then, "WE will create OUR hell".

Read... and weep.


"Biotech Seeking Ways To Make People Suffer Eternally

If there is any question left about the God complex with which some scientists are afflicted, it is answered with this latest news. England's prestigious Oxford University has been the site of ongoing research into life extension technology using various methods, one of which includes a drug that can distort a person's sense of time in order to literally create a feeling of eternal damnation.

A recent article discussing the work of Dr. Rebecca Roache opens with one line: "Sentencing a criminal to 1,000 years in an artificial hell may one day become a reality." And, according to researchers, that day could be quite soon.

Incredibly, this research is being championed by a doctor of philosophy at Oxford who is part of their official blog called Practical Ethics.

Life extension itself is a controversial topic. The era of cyborgs and transhumanism is fast approaching, as we will soon reach the theoretical point of Singularity before 2045 when machine intelligence is predicted to surpass that of humans. Current trends toward autonomous systems of war and the advancement of artificial intelligence are leaning toward a dystopian future. It has prompted ethicists and international human rights organizations to urge restraint. The research being conducted at Oxford is likely to stir a fresh wave of indignation at the possibilities being considered.

Dr. Rebecca Roache and her research team at Oxford apparently seek to correct the inadequacies of sentencing applied to the most heninous criminals. The prime example given is the deranged parents of a four-year-old boy they horrifically tortured and killed - the pair received 30 years; a "laughably inadequate" sentence in Dr. Roache's estimation.

If one only had the power to balance the scales, perhaps to inflict endless suffering and pain ...."

Further at
[link to www.activistpost.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 44065675
United States
05/18/2014 12:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
You can see where Satan resides, I was just today finding out about Social Darwinist, J.D. Rockefeller being one, survival of the fittest, be it life, company etc.. in with all this is the fact they are into eugenic from the start.

I found the people who were in the millionaires club on Jerkol( spelling wrong but most will know) Island Georgia, the one who started the Federal Reserve banking. They were not Jews, they were absolutely criminals, crooks and they all were in Chicago and New York area, they had their people every where. They were into eugenic and they were Social Darwinist IE Atheist in the worse case of being and atheist.

I know you always have to look at the ones behind a movement, The one I started with was Saul Alinsky and his rule for radical, found out it was to create anger in the inter cities about the one that were not in the inter cities not any solutions, just anger. Brainwashing the collage kids with no solutions just destroy.

All this had a sponsor call The Marshall Foundation Trust, Marshall he was from Chicago and he was one of those millionaires, with Rockefeller, Mellon, and other men who started trusts themselves. Marshall his was for community Organizations, yep, some job they are doing still. They are all connected, even down to the mob.

Rockefeller daddy was a con man ran out on his wife changed his name to Doctor Livingston or close to that, married another woman from Canada he was still married. Never to forget the other women in the picture his first love a women name Brown who stayed his mistress. You can imagine what a man like that did to his sons, he even said he cheated his sons to make them tough. Look what that man caused!! They try to hide their connection to him.

They were not late emigrants to America, No there people got here by 1650, so they were not late comers.

The others like Marshall were not late comers either. Saul D. Alinsky's parents were from Russian they were Jews but hard to call them that if they no longer believed in the religion, they seemed to be communist. A lot of communist were in Chicago but they were used by the Foundation who would be crooks and more into Social Darwinism, that included a form of capitalism, which we are enjoying today.

They are so inter link you want to scream, did not one of them come to their senses!

They were in Kansas City Missouri in their day, they had a mob hit in 1950 only two democrat mob guy got nailed with not one mob hit back. There was one thing unusual about the hit, they shot both guys many time and both many times in the left eye! One of the mob guys they picked up through that horn hand sign and smiled. What a day of things I don't know if I really want to know, now to late!


Things are not all they seem, that is for sure, Ayer was an interesting guy and his library, he got Marshall to give money to.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 58184757
Belgium
05/18/2014 04:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
Remember - first, "there is no hell and religion is nonsense"; then, "WE will create OUR hell".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58184757

By this I meant, of course, science putting a hell of iself there where it first denied there was any.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 58184757
Belgium
05/18/2014 04:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
Wells, I can see you like to read and you know a lot of what happened in the past. Rockefeller & co. have had a huge influence upon the direction our civilization has taken since late 19th century or so.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1175381
Slovakia
05/18/2014 08:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
pondering over how a lunatic drivel can be assessed as scientific...
btw scientific atheism is often compared to scientific fecalism...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58198994
United Kingdom
05/18/2014 08:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
Most professional and vocal atheists are, truth be known, only motivated by a childhood hatred of a religious upbringing. thus, their stance had less to do with reason and science and more to do with emotions. therefore, you ignore them. case closed.
zzcat

User ID: 58159075
United States
05/18/2014 04:08 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
If there was any doubt about the nature of materialistic science - materialistic science at the service of the state in particular - there can no longer be. It has spent much effort for a long time to convince us that there is no such thing as hell, and very effectively so. But what appears now ? It appears that scientists may be going to (but in all likelihood will) apply the knowledge of the physical universe science has gathered for centuries to CREATE A HELL OF ITS OWN.

Remember - first, "there is no hell and religion is nonsense"; then, "WE will create OUR hell".

Read... and weep.


"Biotech Seeking Ways To Make People Suffer Eternally

If there is any question left about the God complex with which some scientists are afflicted, it is answered with this latest news. England's prestigious Oxford University has been the site of ongoing research into life extension technology using various methods, one of which includes a drug that can distort a person's sense of time in order to literally create a feeling of eternal damnation.

A recent article discussing the work of Dr. Rebecca Roache opens with one line: "Sentencing a criminal to 1,000 years in an artificial hell may one day become a reality." And, according to researchers, that day could be quite soon.

Incredibly, this research is being championed by a doctor of philosophy at Oxford who is part of their official blog called Practical Ethics.

Life extension itself is a controversial topic. The era of cyborgs and transhumanism is fast approaching, as we will soon reach the theoretical point of Singularity before 2045 when machine intelligence is predicted to surpass that of humans. Current trends toward autonomous systems of war and the advancement of artificial intelligence are leaning toward a dystopian future. It has prompted ethicists and international human rights organizations to urge restraint. The research being conducted at Oxford is likely to stir a fresh wave of indignation at the possibilities being considered.

Dr. Rebecca Roache and her research team at Oxford apparently seek to correct the inadequacies of sentencing applied to the most heninous criminals. The prime example given is the deranged parents of a four-year-old boy they horrifically tortured and killed - the pair received 30 years; a "laughably inadequate" sentence in Dr. Roache's estimation.

If one only had the power to balance the scales, perhaps to inflict endless suffering and pain ...."

Further at
[link to www.activistpost.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58184757

Lol. They did make a religion out of science. Never question it...even though they always change what they say is true. When I was a child they said the earth was 20000 years old, now they say its billions of years old. Muahahahahah.
zzcat

who says Schrodinger's cat is even in the box
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 56481214
Canada
05/18/2014 04:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
Lol. They did make a religion out of science. Never question it...even though they always change what they say is true. When I was a child they said the earth was 20000 years old, now they say its billions of years old. Muahahahahah.
 Quoting: zzcat


So you are what, 600 years old or some such?

Back in the 1800's they were arguing for it being around 20 million years old, so you must have been at one hell of a retard school to have 20 thousand being taught to you.

If that's the case, no wonder you have trouble with science.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58219990
Belgium
05/18/2014 07:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58187747
United States
05/18/2014 07:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
"Does God exist? Well, not yet.” - Ray Kurzweil.

He is the mouthpiece for this Transhumanist (I.E. Satanic) movement.

5* OP and great observation
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58128431
Belgium
05/19/2014 05:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
"Does God exist? Well, not yet.” - Ray Kurzweil.

He is the mouthpiece for this Transhumanist (I.E. Satanic) movement.

5* OP and great observation
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58187747

Thanks.
His statement says it all and sums it up.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58128431
Belgium
05/22/2014 11:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
Apparently he even intends for humanity to "create" God.... but maybe I shouldn't be saying this.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58395943
Belgium
05/24/2014 11:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33857085
United States
05/24/2014 11:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
I think the scientists are mainly liberals who are attacking us via undermining Christianity. We need to keep this in mind when we hear about some knew scientific pronouncement or discovery, I believe there should be an active counterattack made against science.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73802151
United States
09/01/2022 01:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
Most professional and vocal atheists are, truth be known, only motivated by a childhood hatred of a religious upbringing. thus, their stance had less to do with reason and science and more to do with emotions. therefore, you ignore them. case closed.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58198994


Satan appears, appears as an angel of light. This false light appears to make many attach the fake light with the real light they don't look to deep or good to read or see. Thus two birds, one stone. The enemy is clever.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 84104333
Norway
09/01/2022 01:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Did scientific atheism get rid of hell of religion only to literally replace it with hell of its own ?
Hell is a glitch.





GLP