Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,196 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 961,948
Pageviews Today: 1,604,649Threads Today: 647Posts Today: 11,565
04:04 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

>>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


exactly ...why edit something "normal"
 Quoting: SunnyDaze

It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


oh and your dropcanvas is also down..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22146748
United States
05/19/2014 04:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
9 pages, to hell with it.

Oh well, why not.


I watch LASCO daily; been looking up for as long as I can remember.

It's asymmetrical. Count the lights.

The pixel shows an extra light dot to the left of it. I should add that these pixels appear DAILY.

Where are the before and after frames to show it's movement? If the interval skips 30 minutes or more then yes, they altered things. You can watch the timestamp, it serves as an obvious clue to obfuscation.

Don't forget, there's TONS of space junk orbiting us.

I will say that it looks suspiciously 'man-made', but let's talk scaling. This would be almost the size of Earth if it were indeed a craft. Yes, slight exaggeration, but what is 6/9 the size of Earth to use in comparison here?

Finally, NASA is the LAST place we'll get what we want.


They'll let us know when they're here.

And they SURE AS HELL won't hang their ass out in front of the only lightbulb in the house if they want to stay hidden. NASA or no NASA.


Just a few thoughts-I don't have a final conclusion regarding authenticity.

Besides. By page 9 everything's turned to shit anyway.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


clappa
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


I'm blushing. Even if you were being ironic. hf
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 04:33 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
btw dr. astro... nasa want the raw image you have back.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


#FML
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 04:33 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...

It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


oh and your dropcanvas is also down..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


No it's not:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
astrobanner2
RTS REDUX

User ID: 57849075
United States
05/19/2014 04:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
The pixel shows an extra light dot to the left of it. I should add that these pixels appear DAILY.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


if you are referring to the frame in the video I agree.

it was edited after the video maker asked NASA about it, probably as a joke.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
9 pages, to hell with it.

Oh well, why not.


I watch LASCO daily; been looking up for as long as I can remember.

It's asymmetrical. Count the lights.

The pixel shows an extra light dot to the left of it. I should add that these pixels appear DAILY.

Where are the before and after frames to show it's movement? If the interval skips 30 minutes or more then yes, they altered things. You can watch the timestamp, it serves as an obvious clue to obfuscation.

Don't forget, there's TONS of space junk orbiting us.

I will say that it looks suspiciously 'man-made', but let's talk scaling. This would be almost the size of Earth if it were indeed a craft. Yes, slight exaggeration, but what is 6/9 the size of Earth to use in comparison here?

Finally, NASA is the LAST place we'll get what we want.


They'll let us know when they're here.

And they SURE AS HELL won't hang their ass out in front of the only lightbulb in the house if they want to stay hidden. NASA or no NASA.


Just a few thoughts-I don't have a final conclusion regarding authenticity.

Besides. By page 9 everything's turned to shit anyway.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


clappa
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


I'm blushing. Even if you were being ironic. hf
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748



no no, not at all. i enjoy seeing a sound mind.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


oh and your dropcanvas is also down..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


No it's not:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


well its only working for you then?
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 04:37 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
no no, not at all. i enjoy seeing a sound mind.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Then why did you say my dropcanvas was down? Damn near gave me a heart attack. It's up.
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 04:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


oh and your dropcanvas is also down..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


No it's not:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


well its only working for you then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Nope.
[link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com]
Any other nonsense you want to spread?
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


oh and your dropcanvas is also down..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


No it's not:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


well its only working for you then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Nope.
[link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com]
Any other nonsense you want to spread?
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks

[link to www.speedyshare.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
no no, not at all. i enjoy seeing a sound mind.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Then why did you say my dropcanvas was down? Damn near gave me a heart attack. It's up.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


im serious its down and cloudflare is saying error 522 if i get anything at all.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 04:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
no no, not at all. i enjoy seeing a sound mind.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Then why did you say my dropcanvas was down? Damn near gave me a heart attack. It's up.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


im serious its down and cloudflare is saying error 522 if i get anything at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


Works for me and Down For Everyone says it's up too.
[link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com]
astrobanner2
Neeun

User ID: 48895454
United States
05/19/2014 04:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
NASA?

Not
A
Space
Agency
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58238483


N -Normal
A -Anus
S -Sucking
A -Assholes
 Quoting: Jango Mfwic


N -ice
A -ir
S -how
A -ssholes


N -eed
A -nother
S -even
A -stronauts

^ went around after the 86 challenger accident
Legal Disclaimer: All comments are intended as humor and/or fiction and not advice, and not to be confused with any event or person, living or dead.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 04:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


No it's not:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


well its only working for you then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Nope.
[link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com]
Any other nonsense you want to spread?
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks

[link to www.speedyshare.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


[link to www.speedyshare.com]
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22146748
United States
05/19/2014 04:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


exactly ...why edit something "normal"
 Quoting: SunnyDaze

It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


You only look like a shill to those looking to make you out as one.

I am (pardon the hubris)...not without education, tact, subterfuge and vision.

You fight a daily fight here, and I honestly concede that I have NO IDEA what REALLY is going on up there. At the same time, I look for obvious clues in things.

Your point about the raw data though. Unless the uploader grafted the pixel over something himself, it does raise an eyebrow that raw data included an image, and now we see a pixel there.

BUT, I don't find it suspicious for the reason I stated above: It's not exactly a hidden pixel.

If I was wearing a tin-foil skullcap, I'd say hiding things in plain sight, etc. etc.



But please, allow me this heartfelt conclusion:


It doesn't matter what, if anything, NASA is 'hiding'.


A: Our stuff. Top secret for a reason.

B: Not our stuff. Do we REALLY need a bunch of Katrina victims tearing the U.S. apart over another war of the worlds scare? If there ARE aliens superior to us, they're obviously being quiet about using our sun for refueling, or whatever else IN SECRET. No threat. If there was, it would be beyond our control anyway. That said, it's best left with politics and religion. Alone. Personal belief systems, fantasy and threats to the human race do NOT share a room.

C: Neither. 1's and 0's baby. They click, dance, glitch and crumble. Especially the ones traveling between the sun and our (?)sphere.



What I mean to say is, is that we're qualified for nothing more than being entertained. We're ants.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
no no, not at all. i enjoy seeing a sound mind.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Then why did you say my dropcanvas was down? Damn near gave me a heart attack. It's up.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


im serious its down and cloudflare is saying error 522 if i get anything at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


Works for me and Down For Everyone says it's up too.
[link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


here is the proof

[link to imgur.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


well its only working for you then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Nope.
[link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com]
Any other nonsense you want to spread?
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks

[link to www.speedyshare.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


[link to www.speedyshare.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


thanks.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 04:50 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Your point about the raw data though. Unless the uploader grafted the pixel over something himself,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748

Well let me stop you right there, I personally think that is the most likely situation. What evidence do we really have that the JPG image on the main SOHO site ever looked different than what it currently looks like? A youtube video from a channel which has previously posted hoaxes ( [link to www.ufo-blogger.com] ). That's all, as far as I can see.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


well its only working for you then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Nope.
[link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com]
Any other nonsense you want to spread?
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks

[link to www.speedyshare.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


[link to www.speedyshare.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro



is this what im supposed to see with the raw image ???

[link to imgur.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Your point about the raw data though. Unless the uploader grafted the pixel over something himself,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748

Well let me stop you right there, I personally think that is the most likely situation. What evidence do we really have that the JPG image on the main SOHO site ever looked different than what it currently looks like? A youtube video from a channel which has previously posted hoaxes ( [link to www.ufo-blogger.com] ). That's all, as far as I can see.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Your point about the raw data though. Unless the uploader grafted the pixel over something himself,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748

Well let me stop you right there, I personally think that is the most likely situation. What evidence do we really have that the JPG image on the main SOHO site ever looked different than what it currently looks like? A youtube video from a channel which has previously posted hoaxes ( [link to www.ufo-blogger.com] ). That's all, as far as I can see.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


i agree this is the most likely situation.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22146748
United States
05/19/2014 04:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
9 pages, to hell with it.

Oh well, why not.


I watch LASCO daily; been looking up for as long as I can remember.

It's asymmetrical. Count the lights.

The pixel shows an extra light dot to the left of it. I should add that these pixels appear DAILY.

Where are the before and after frames to show it's movement? If the interval skips 30 minutes or more then yes, they altered things. You can watch the timestamp, it serves as an obvious clue to obfuscation.

Don't forget, there's TONS of space junk orbiting us.

I will say that it looks suspiciously 'man-made', but let's talk scaling. This would be almost the size of Earth if it were indeed a craft. Yes, slight exaggeration, but what is 6/9 the size of Earth to use in comparison here?

Finally, NASA is the LAST place we'll get what we want.


They'll let us know when they're here.

And they SURE AS HELL won't hang their ass out in front of the only lightbulb in the house if they want to stay hidden. NASA or no NASA.


Just a few thoughts-I don't have a final conclusion regarding authenticity.

Besides. By page 9 everything's turned to shit anyway.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


clappa
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


I'm blushing. Even if you were being ironic. hf
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748



no no, not at all. i enjoy seeing a sound mind.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


*heart flutters*

thanks. Without sounding arrogant, I sense one within you as well. ;)

glp has tossed and turned like Dorthy's house in the Wizard of Oz since ST from BG had people eating lies.

It's crazy how the I.Q. range here TRULY deviates from 60-200.

Though I should add that the intelligence quotient application is flawed, dated, and a poor representation of one's mentality. I usually lose people when I say that.

IQ is age vs. mental age. We should have evolved from this method decades ago.
Mukk1234

User ID: 40837657
United States
05/19/2014 04:59 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
You see lots of pins everyday but I must say, this is probably the best one I have ever seen. It should get a mega pin!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55566661


It will never happen when the thread is taken over...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22146748
United States
05/19/2014 04:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Your point about the raw data though. Unless the uploader grafted the pixel over something himself,
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748

Well let me stop you right there, I personally think that is the most likely situation. What evidence do we really have that the JPG image on the main SOHO site ever looked different than what it currently looks like? A youtube video from a channel which has previously posted hoaxes ( [link to www.ufo-blogger.com] ). That's all, as far as I can see.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Yeah. Youtube has become a cesspool of selling whatever garbage lie you can to get ad revenue.

I'm 200% excited about EVERYTHING outside of our planet. I'm hopeful for life on other planets.

I dare to dream.

However, I'm reaching a point in which I will no longer tolerate these bullshit National Enquirer stories being passed off as truth. Worse, when intelligent, sound-minded (thanks AC) people bring the simplicity of Occam's razor sheathed in logic get bashed for pages about being a government shill.


You know what? fuck it. If there WERE giant alien war machines surrounding us, I'd rather it were kept quiet.

Too many fuckwits out there looking for a reason to kill their neighbor and steal their water hose.

But no, I'm confident now that this is bullshit.

However, a time MAY come when we all look up, and have NO need for forums or knowledge of zeros and ones. It'll be right there.

THAT's when I'll raise an eyebrow. This cloak and dagger forged in boredom routine is become a sad, paralyzed attention vampire feeding their children with adsense and lies.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 05:01 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...

Nope.
[link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com]
Any other nonsense you want to spread?
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks

[link to www.speedyshare.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


[link to www.speedyshare.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro



is this what im supposed to see with the raw image ???

[link to imgur.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
Post processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration:
[link to speedy.sh]
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22146748
United States
05/19/2014 05:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
You see lots of pins everyday but I must say, this is probably the best one I have ever seen. It should get a mega pin!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55566661


It will never happen when the thread is taken over...
 Quoting: Mukk1234


By people who really think?

Or by people who want a neat story, and will do and say ANYTHING, no matter how crass, to keep bullshit thriving?

Frankly, I've already said it.

That, and Astro has taken more groin shots than anyone I've met online. Sadly, were he/she (?) to approach a genuine think-tank, he would be received with respect and appreciation.

I'm not riding your nuts (?) Astro. I respect you, myself, and anyone who goes against the grain when it is clearly rotting.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 05:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks

[link to www.speedyshare.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


[link to www.speedyshare.com]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro



is this what im supposed to see with the raw image ???

[link to imgur.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
Post processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration:
[link to speedy.sh]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


using gimp 2.8. but i believe 2.9 has been revamped for astronomical purposes, which should produce better images than this.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 05:09 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
 Quoting: Dr. Astro



is this what im supposed to see with the raw image ???

[link to imgur.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
Post processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration:
[link to speedy.sh]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


using gimp 2.8. but i believe 2.9 has been revamped for astronomical purposes, which should produce better images than this.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


Yeah, that won't really let you process it in the native bit depth, which you absolutely need to do in order to process it correctly. I have 2.8 as well, no idea whether 2.9 can handle high bit depth images properly or not.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33708644
United States
05/19/2014 05:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


exactly ...why edit something "normal"
 Quoting: SunnyDaze

It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


HaHa shill!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 05:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...



is this what im supposed to see with the raw image ???

[link to imgur.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
Post processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration:
[link to speedy.sh]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


using gimp 2.8. but i believe 2.9 has been revamped for astronomical purposes, which should produce better images than this.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


Yeah, that won't really let you process it in the native bit depth, which you absolutely need to do in order to process it correctly. I have 2.8 as well, no idea whether 2.9 can handle high bit depth images properly or not.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


2.9 does 32 bit float.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 05:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...

Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
Post processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration:
[link to speedy.sh]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


using gimp 2.8. but i believe 2.9 has been revamped for astronomical purposes, which should produce better images than this.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


Yeah, that won't really let you process it in the native bit depth, which you absolutely need to do in order to process it correctly. I have 2.8 as well, no idea whether 2.9 can handle high bit depth images properly or not.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


2.9 does 32 bit float.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


Nice! I'll have to upgrade then, though for most purposes PixInsight's still my baby.
astrobanner2





GLP