>>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this. I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you. If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE. This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on. I love metaphor. Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down. oh and your dropcanvas is also down.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22146748 United States 05/19/2014 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 9 pages, to hell with it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748 Oh well, why not. I watch LASCO daily; been looking up for as long as I can remember. It's asymmetrical. Count the lights. The pixel shows an extra light dot to the left of it. I should add that these pixels appear DAILY. Where are the before and after frames to show it's movement? If the interval skips 30 minutes or more then yes, they altered things. You can watch the timestamp, it serves as an obvious clue to obfuscation. Don't forget, there's TONS of space junk orbiting us. I will say that it looks suspiciously 'man-made', but let's talk scaling. This would be almost the size of Earth if it were indeed a craft. Yes, slight exaggeration, but what is 6/9 the size of Earth to use in comparison here? Finally, NASA is the LAST place we'll get what we want. They'll let us know when they're here. And they SURE AS HELL won't hang their ass out in front of the only lightbulb in the house if they want to stay hidden. NASA or no NASA. Just a few thoughts-I don't have a final conclusion regarding authenticity. Besides. By page 9 everything's turned to shit anyway. I'm blushing. Even if you were being ironic. |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 05/19/2014 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 05/19/2014 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this. I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you. If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE. This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on. I love metaphor. Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down. oh and your dropcanvas is also down.. No it's not: [link to dropcanvas.com] |
RTS REDUX
User ID: 57849075 United States 05/19/2014 04:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 9 pages, to hell with it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748 Oh well, why not. I watch LASCO daily; been looking up for as long as I can remember. It's asymmetrical. Count the lights. The pixel shows an extra light dot to the left of it. I should add that these pixels appear DAILY. Where are the before and after frames to show it's movement? If the interval skips 30 minutes or more then yes, they altered things. You can watch the timestamp, it serves as an obvious clue to obfuscation. Don't forget, there's TONS of space junk orbiting us. I will say that it looks suspiciously 'man-made', but let's talk scaling. This would be almost the size of Earth if it were indeed a craft. Yes, slight exaggeration, but what is 6/9 the size of Earth to use in comparison here? Finally, NASA is the LAST place we'll get what we want. They'll let us know when they're here. And they SURE AS HELL won't hang their ass out in front of the only lightbulb in the house if they want to stay hidden. NASA or no NASA. Just a few thoughts-I don't have a final conclusion regarding authenticity. Besides. By page 9 everything's turned to shit anyway. I'm blushing. Even if you were being ironic. no no, not at all. i enjoy seeing a sound mind. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748 I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you. If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE. This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on. I love metaphor. Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down. oh and your dropcanvas is also down.. No it's not: [link to dropcanvas.com] well its only working for you then? |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 05/19/2014 04:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 05/19/2014 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down. oh and your dropcanvas is also down.. No it's not: [link to dropcanvas.com] well its only working for you then? Nope. [link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com] Any other nonsense you want to spread? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 04:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101 Nope. [link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com] Any other nonsense you want to spread? well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks [link to www.speedyshare.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 04:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 05/19/2014 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then why did you say my dropcanvas was down? Damn near gave me a heart attack. It's up. im serious its down and cloudflare is saying error 522 if i get anything at all. Works for me and Down For Everyone says it's up too. [link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
Neeun
User ID: 48895454 United States 05/19/2014 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 05/19/2014 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nope. [link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com] Any other nonsense you want to spread? well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks [link to www.speedyshare.com] [link to www.speedyshare.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22146748 United States 05/19/2014 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this. I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you. If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE. This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on. I love metaphor. Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down. You only look like a shill to those looking to make you out as one. I am (pardon the hubris)...not without education, tact, subterfuge and vision. You fight a daily fight here, and I honestly concede that I have NO IDEA what REALLY is going on up there. At the same time, I look for obvious clues in things. Your point about the raw data though. Unless the uploader grafted the pixel over something himself, it does raise an eyebrow that raw data included an image, and now we see a pixel there. BUT, I don't find it suspicious for the reason I stated above: It's not exactly a hidden pixel. If I was wearing a tin-foil skullcap, I'd say hiding things in plain sight, etc. etc. But please, allow me this heartfelt conclusion: It doesn't matter what, if anything, NASA is 'hiding'. A: Our stuff. Top secret for a reason. B: Not our stuff. Do we REALLY need a bunch of Katrina victims tearing the U.S. apart over another war of the worlds scare? If there ARE aliens superior to us, they're obviously being quiet about using our sun for refueling, or whatever else IN SECRET. No threat. If there was, it would be beyond our control anyway. That said, it's best left with politics and religion. Alone. Personal belief systems, fantasy and threats to the human race do NOT share a room. C: Neither. 1's and 0's baby. They click, dance, glitch and crumble. Especially the ones traveling between the sun and our (?)sphere. What I mean to say is, is that we're qualified for nothing more than being entertained. We're ants. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Then why did you say my dropcanvas was down? Damn near gave me a heart attack. It's up. im serious its down and cloudflare is saying error 522 if i get anything at all. Works for me and Down For Everyone says it's up too. [link to www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com] here is the proof [link to imgur.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 04:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Dr. Astro well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks [link to www.speedyshare.com] [link to www.speedyshare.com] thanks. |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 05/19/2014 04:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your point about the raw data though. Unless the uploader grafted the pixel over something himself, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748 Well let me stop you right there, I personally think that is the most likely situation. What evidence do we really have that the JPG image on the main SOHO site ever looked different than what it currently looks like? A youtube video from a channel which has previously posted hoaxes ( [link to www.ufo-blogger.com] ). That's all, as far as I can see. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Dr. Astro well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks [link to www.speedyshare.com] [link to www.speedyshare.com] is this what im supposed to see with the raw image ??? [link to imgur.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 04:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your point about the raw data though. Unless the uploader grafted the pixel over something himself, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748 Well let me stop you right there, I personally think that is the most likely situation. What evidence do we really have that the JPG image on the main SOHO site ever looked different than what it currently looks like? A youtube video from a channel which has previously posted hoaxes ( [link to www.ufo-blogger.com] ). That's all, as far as I can see. Your point about the raw data though. Unless the uploader grafted the pixel over something himself, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748 Well let me stop you right there, I personally think that is the most likely situation. What evidence do we really have that the JPG image on the main SOHO site ever looked different than what it currently looks like? A youtube video from a channel which has previously posted hoaxes ( [link to www.ufo-blogger.com] ). That's all, as far as I can see. i agree this is the most likely situation. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22146748 United States 05/19/2014 04:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 9 pages, to hell with it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748 Oh well, why not. I watch LASCO daily; been looking up for as long as I can remember. It's asymmetrical. Count the lights. The pixel shows an extra light dot to the left of it. I should add that these pixels appear DAILY. Where are the before and after frames to show it's movement? If the interval skips 30 minutes or more then yes, they altered things. You can watch the timestamp, it serves as an obvious clue to obfuscation. Don't forget, there's TONS of space junk orbiting us. I will say that it looks suspiciously 'man-made', but let's talk scaling. This would be almost the size of Earth if it were indeed a craft. Yes, slight exaggeration, but what is 6/9 the size of Earth to use in comparison here? Finally, NASA is the LAST place we'll get what we want. They'll let us know when they're here. And they SURE AS HELL won't hang their ass out in front of the only lightbulb in the house if they want to stay hidden. NASA or no NASA. Just a few thoughts-I don't have a final conclusion regarding authenticity. Besides. By page 9 everything's turned to shit anyway. I'm blushing. Even if you were being ironic. no no, not at all. i enjoy seeing a sound mind. *heart flutters* thanks. Without sounding arrogant, I sense one within you as well. ;) glp has tossed and turned like Dorthy's house in the Wizard of Oz since ST from BG had people eating lies. It's crazy how the I.Q. range here TRULY deviates from 60-200. Though I should add that the intelligence quotient application is flawed, dated, and a poor representation of one's mentality. I usually lose people when I say that. IQ is age vs. mental age. We should have evolved from this method decades ago. |
Mukk1234
User ID: 40837657 United States 05/19/2014 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22146748 United States 05/19/2014 04:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Your point about the raw data though. Unless the uploader grafted the pixel over something himself, Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748 Well let me stop you right there, I personally think that is the most likely situation. What evidence do we really have that the JPG image on the main SOHO site ever looked different than what it currently looks like? A youtube video from a channel which has previously posted hoaxes ( [link to www.ufo-blogger.com] ). That's all, as far as I can see. Yeah. Youtube has become a cesspool of selling whatever garbage lie you can to get ad revenue. I'm 200% excited about EVERYTHING outside of our planet. I'm hopeful for life on other planets. I dare to dream. However, I'm reaching a point in which I will no longer tolerate these bullshit National Enquirer stories being passed off as truth. Worse, when intelligent, sound-minded (thanks AC) people bring the simplicity of Occam's razor sheathed in logic get bashed for pages about being a government shill. You know what? fuck it. If there WERE giant alien war machines surrounding us, I'd rather it were kept quiet. Too many fuckwits out there looking for a reason to kill their neighbor and steal their water hose. But no, I'm confident now that this is bullshit. However, a time MAY come when we all look up, and have NO need for forums or knowledge of zeros and ones. It'll be right there. THAT's when I'll raise an eyebrow. This cloak and dagger forged in boredom routine is become a sad, paralyzed attention vampire feeding their children with adsense and lies. |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 05/19/2014 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks [link to www.speedyshare.com] [link to www.speedyshare.com] is this what im supposed to see with the raw image ??? [link to imgur.com] Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing: [link to h.dropcanvas.com] Post processing: [link to h.dropcanvas.com] I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration: [link to speedy.sh] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22146748 United States 05/19/2014 05:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You see lots of pins everyday but I must say, this is probably the best one I have ever seen. It should get a mega pin! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55566661 It will never happen when the thread is taken over... By people who really think? Or by people who want a neat story, and will do and say ANYTHING, no matter how crass, to keep bullshit thriving? Frankly, I've already said it. That, and Astro has taken more groin shots than anyone I've met online. Sadly, were he/she (?) to approach a genuine think-tank, he would be received with respect and appreciation. I'm not riding your nuts (?) Astro. I respect you, myself, and anyone who goes against the grain when it is clearly rotting. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101 well its down for me, can you upload the raw image here , if just for me? thanks [link to www.speedyshare.com] [link to www.speedyshare.com] is this what im supposed to see with the raw image ??? [link to imgur.com] Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing: [link to h.dropcanvas.com] Post processing: [link to h.dropcanvas.com] I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration: [link to speedy.sh] using gimp 2.8. but i believe 2.9 has been revamped for astronomical purposes, which should produce better images than this. |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 05/19/2014 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101 Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing: [link to h.dropcanvas.com] Post processing: [link to h.dropcanvas.com] I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration: [link to speedy.sh] using gimp 2.8. but i believe 2.9 has been revamped for astronomical purposes, which should produce better images than this. Yeah, that won't really let you process it in the native bit depth, which you absolutely need to do in order to process it correctly. I have 2.8 as well, no idea whether 2.9 can handle high bit depth images properly or not. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33708644 United States 05/19/2014 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this. I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you. If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE. This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on. I love metaphor. Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down. HaHa shill! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 58197101 United Kingdom 05/19/2014 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing: [link to h.dropcanvas.com] Post processing: [link to h.dropcanvas.com] I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration: [link to speedy.sh] using gimp 2.8. but i believe 2.9 has been revamped for astronomical purposes, which should produce better images than this. Yeah, that won't really let you process it in the native bit depth, which you absolutely need to do in order to process it correctly. I have 2.8 as well, no idea whether 2.9 can handle high bit depth images properly or not. 2.9 does 32 bit float. |
Dr. Astro
Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 05/19/2014 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing: [link to h.dropcanvas.com] Post processing: [link to h.dropcanvas.com] I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration: [link to speedy.sh] using gimp 2.8. but i believe 2.9 has been revamped for astronomical purposes, which should produce better images than this. Yeah, that won't really let you process it in the native bit depth, which you absolutely need to do in order to process it correctly. I have 2.8 as well, no idea whether 2.9 can handle high bit depth images properly or not. 2.9 does 32 bit float. Nice! I'll have to upgrade then, though for most purposes PixInsight's still my baby. |