Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,508 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 282,793
Pageviews Today: 461,243Threads Today: 150Posts Today: 2,629
06:37 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

>>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 05:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
You see lots of pins everyday but I must say, this is probably the best one I have ever seen. It should get a mega pin!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55566661


It will never happen when the thread is taken over...
 Quoting: Mukk1234


By people who really think?

Or by people who want a neat story, and will do and say ANYTHING, no matter how crass, to keep bullshit thriving?

Frankly, I've already said it.

That, and Astro has taken more groin shots than anyone I've met online. Sadly, were he/she (?) to approach a genuine think-tank, he would be received with respect and appreciation.

I'm not riding your nuts (?) Astro. I respect you, myself, and anyone who goes against the grain when it is clearly rotting.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


i used to care enough to be as articulate as you on here. maybe ill rethink the situation.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58244604
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 05:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
3...2...1 Astro super shill....with his government issued
"Explanation"

"Sorry guys, this is an anomaly caused by the 3rd, 4th and 12th axis of the subatomic gyros modulator drifting approximately 000.0235 degrees from its regular position of 0.6987 quad vibrational orbit. Its simply a normal artifact that we...uh..I meant NASA regularly edits out due to bidirectional viewing of multiple professional astronomers like me. NASA is always a step ahead assuring we humans are never in a centrifuge of bioengineering viscosity that are always explained away with a simple and logical super intelligent explanation. NASA is hard at work every day looking out for "our" best interests, while at the same time assuring we remain 100% protected from interstellar projectiles of solidified mass.

Move along, nothing to see here.
 Quoting: Jango Mfwic


Excellent Dr. Assmasteroid Shillstro parody!

cruise
Mukk1234

User ID: 40837657
United States
05/19/2014 05:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
You see lots of pins everyday but I must say, this is probably the best one I have ever seen. It should get a mega pin!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55566661


It will never happen when the thread is taken over...
 Quoting: Mukk1234


By people who really think?

Or by people who want a neat story, and will do and say ANYTHING, no matter how crass, to keep bullshit thriving?

Frankly, I've already said it.

That, and Astro has taken more groin shots than anyone I've met online. Sadly, were he/she (?) to approach a genuine think-tank, he would be received with respect and appreciation.

I'm not riding your nuts (?) Astro. I respect you, myself, and anyone who goes against the grain when it is clearly rotting.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


By people that think? Nice try but no cigar for you. I have watched you for a long time take over threads especially if they mention one bad thing about NASA. Your a hack man and you come on here and intimidate people by throwing around your PHD credentials and making people feel stupid. You can fool some people but not everyone. To me your just a rude hack and on threads like these you basically take them over with any tactic you see fit to thrash a thread. You are a true THREAD KILLER....
Éireann

User ID: 58168905
United States
05/19/2014 05:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
It's the "7 sisters" star cluster. One click in photoshops bandaid tool would edit that out seamlessly. This is a "glitch"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56165770

The stars that make up the Pleiades have never looked all spaced out and ordered like that since I've been looking at them and that's going on 48 years tomorrow.

I've seen the Pleiades on SOHO images before, and that isn't close. It might not be an alien spaceship, but I don't think it's the Pleiades either.
 Quoting: Éireann


eireann you just replied to the schill lol
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

*facepalm*

I do that all the time sigh I'm such a sucker.
Eireann~

I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 05:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
You see lots of pins everyday but I must say, this is probably the best one I have ever seen. It should get a mega pin!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55566661


It will never happen when the thread is taken over...
 Quoting: Mukk1234


By people who really think?

Or by people who want a neat story, and will do and say ANYTHING, no matter how crass, to keep bullshit thriving?

Frankly, I've already said it.

That, and Astro has taken more groin shots than anyone I've met online. Sadly, were he/she (?) to approach a genuine think-tank, he would be received with respect and appreciation.

I'm not riding your nuts (?) Astro. I respect you, myself, and anyone who goes against the grain when it is clearly rotting.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


By people that think? Nice try but no cigar for you. I have watched you for a long time take over threads especially if they mention one bad thing about NASA. Your a hack man and you come on here and intimidate people by throwing around your PHD credentials and making people feel stupid. You can fool some people but not everyone. To me your just a rude hack and on threads like these you basically take them over with any tactic you see fit to thrash a thread. You are a true THREAD KILLER....
 Quoting: Mukk1234


Really? AC 22146748 has been nothing but respectful as far as I have seen, but then again I haven't been following him around GLP like you have apparently.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 05:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
You see lots of pins everyday but I must say, this is probably the best one I have ever seen. It should get a mega pin!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55566661


It will never happen when the thread is taken over...
 Quoting: Mukk1234


By people who really think?

Or by people who want a neat story, and will do and say ANYTHING, no matter how crass, to keep bullshit thriving?

Frankly, I've already said it.

That, and Astro has taken more groin shots than anyone I've met online. Sadly, were he/she (?) to approach a genuine think-tank, he would be received with respect and appreciation.

I'm not riding your nuts (?) Astro. I respect you, myself, and anyone who goes against the grain when it is clearly rotting.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


By people that think? Nice try but no cigar for you. I have watched you for a long time take over threads especially if they mention one bad thing about NASA. Your a hack man and you come on here and intimidate people by throwing around your PHD credentials and making people feel stupid. You can fool some people but not everyone. To me your just a rude hack and on threads like these you basically take them over with any tactic you see fit to thrash a thread. You are a true THREAD KILLER....
 Quoting: Mukk1234


lol the butthurt shows.
MulvaGippleDelores

User ID: 49326948
United States
05/19/2014 05:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
This has been a GREAT thread - pushing aside the name calling and such, there has been some GREAT conversation here....

Is that database still down Astro?
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 05:47 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
This has been a GREAT thread - pushing aside the name calling and such, there has been some GREAT conversation here....

Is that database still down Astro?
 Quoting: MulvaGippleDelores


Yes, which is why I gave links above to the raw data that I downloaded before it went down.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57592297
United States
05/19/2014 05:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Nibiru! LOL
MulvaGippleDelores

User ID: 49326948
United States
05/19/2014 05:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
This has been a GREAT thread - pushing aside the name calling and such, there has been some GREAT conversation here....

Is that database still down Astro?
 Quoting: MulvaGippleDelores


Yes, which is why I gave links above to the raw data that I downloaded before it went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Ya - that's fine - you know people will still not take that for what it is unless they get it right from the horse's mouth LOL....

I *would find it funny if the database comes up and the images are gone LOLOLOL.....
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 05:53 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
This has been a GREAT thread - pushing aside the name calling and such, there has been some GREAT conversation here....

Is that database still down Astro?
 Quoting: MulvaGippleDelores


Yes, which is why I gave links above to the raw data that I downloaded before it went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Ya - that's fine - you know people will still not take that for what it is unless they get it right from the horse's mouth LOL....

I *would find it funny if the database comes up and the images are gone LOLOLOL.....
 Quoting: MulvaGippleDelores


face_headshot
astrobanner2
Mukk1234

User ID: 40837657
United States
05/19/2014 05:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


It will never happen when the thread is taken over...
 Quoting: Mukk1234


By people who really think?

Or by people who want a neat story, and will do and say ANYTHING, no matter how crass, to keep bullshit thriving?

Frankly, I've already said it.

That, and Astro has taken more groin shots than anyone I've met online. Sadly, were he/she (?) to approach a genuine think-tank, he would be received with respect and appreciation.

I'm not riding your nuts (?) Astro. I respect you, myself, and anyone who goes against the grain when it is clearly rotting.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


By people that think? Nice try but no cigar for you. I have watched you for a long time take over threads especially if they mention one bad thing about NASA. Your a hack man and you come on here and intimidate people by throwing around your PHD credentials and making people feel stupid. You can fool some people but not everyone. To me your just a rude hack and on threads like these you basically take them over with any tactic you see fit to thrash a thread. You are a true THREAD KILLER....
 Quoting: Mukk1234


lol the butthurt shows.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


No butthurt here man....just giving you some constructive criticism.
MulvaGippleDelores

User ID: 49326948
United States
05/19/2014 05:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
This has been a GREAT thread - pushing aside the name calling and such, there has been some GREAT conversation here....

Is that database still down Astro?
 Quoting: MulvaGippleDelores


Yes, which is why I gave links above to the raw data that I downloaded before it went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Ya - that's fine - you know people will still not take that for what it is unless they get it right from the horse's mouth LOL....

I *would find it funny if the database comes up and the images are gone LOLOLOL.....
 Quoting: MulvaGippleDelores


face_headshot
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Exactly LOLOLOLOL....
Mukk1234

User ID: 40837657
United States
05/19/2014 06:47 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
BUMP IT BACK UP

bump
Hydra

User ID: 58232750
Germany
05/19/2014 07:11 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
is this what im supposed to see with the raw image ???

[link to imgur.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101

Heh, actually whatever you used to open it handled the levels better than PixInsight (or maybe you did an auto-clip), but yes, that's what the raw image looks like prior to processing. Again, before processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
Post processing:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
I used PixInsight to process it, calibrating against a previous day's image. Since the database of raw data is down, and since London apparently can't access dropcanvas, here's an earlier image for you for calibration:
[link to speedy.sh]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


using gimp 2.8. but i believe 2.9 has been revamped for astronomical purposes, which should produce better images than this.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58197101


Yeah, that won't really let you process it in the native bit depth, which you absolutely need to do in order to process it correctly. I have 2.8 as well, no idea whether 2.9 can handle high bit depth images properly or not.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

Astro, did you ever try "Fitswork"?
Just a quick processing: [link to p-m-a.org]

.
:ase26122019:
Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India
Dr. Mehitable
User ID: 1524722
United States
05/19/2014 09:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
BUMP IT BACK UP

bump
 Quoting: Mukk1234



I second that bump:


bump
#Geomagnetic_Storm#

User ID: 44557506
United States
05/20/2014 04:42 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Nibiru
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57953465


:KapNibiru:
Geoshill


Link to my Gaming Channel….
[link to m.youtube.com (secure)]
MulvaGippleDelores

User ID: 49326948
United States
05/20/2014 08:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Is that database back up?
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 55240075
United States
05/20/2014 08:18 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Well, the bastard appears to have deleted my comment from yesterday. Guess he's not interested in discussing it. So predictable. Happy with the meaningless result Mehible?
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35501982
United States
05/20/2014 08:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Well, the bastard appears to have deleted my comment from yesterday. Guess he's not interested in discussing it. So predictable. Happy with the meaningless result Mehible?
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


So what was the end result?
MulvaGippleDelores

User ID: 49326948
United States
05/20/2014 08:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Well, the bastard appears to have deleted my comment from yesterday. Guess he's not interested in discussing it. So predictable. Happy with the meaningless result Mehible?
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


So what was the end result?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35501982


Which comment and end result?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58274657
Uruguay
05/20/2014 08:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


exactly ...why edit something "normal"
 Quoting: SunnyDaze

It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

What makes you a shill is that you deny what we all see, but you don't have any evidence to support your claims. Yes, you are definitely a shill.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1011606
France
05/20/2014 08:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...

It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

What makes you a shill is that you deny what we all see, but you don't have any evidence to support your claims. Yes, you are definitely a shill.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58274657


There is no more evidence to support the claim of secureteam10.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58274657
Uruguay
05/20/2014 08:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

What makes you a shill is that you deny what we all see, but you don't have any evidence to support your claims. Yes, you are definitely a shill.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58274657


There is no more evidence to support the claim of secureteam10.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1011606


You must be blind
whatever
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1011606
France
05/20/2014 08:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

What makes you a shill is that you deny what we all see, but you don't have any evidence to support your claims. Yes, you are definitely a shill.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58274657


There is no more evidence to support the claim of secureteam10.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1011606


You must be blind
whatever
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58274657


Then tell me what is the evidence that NASA first published a picture with "the craft" and then change it to the picture with "the covering".
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 55240075
United States
05/20/2014 08:52 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

What makes you a shill is that you deny what we all see, but you don't have any evidence to support your claims. Yes, you are definitely a shill.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58274657


There is no more evidence to support the claim of secureteam10.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1011606


And the raw data does support my claim.
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 55240075
United States
05/20/2014 08:56 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Well, the bastard appears to have deleted my comment from yesterday. Guess he's not interested in discussing it. So predictable. Happy with the meaningless result Mehible?
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


So what was the end result?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35501982


The end result is that they immediately deleted my comment containing my processing of the raw data showing that there is no UFO. They are covering up my evidence. They're not to be trusted.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1011606
France
05/20/2014 08:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro

What makes you a shill is that you deny what we all see, but you don't have any evidence to support your claims. Yes, you are definitely a shill.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58274657


There is no more evidence to support the claim of secureteam10.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1011606


And the raw data does support my claim.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Yes, but even if it's illogical, one can argue that the raw data could also have been altered.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 55240075
United States
05/20/2014 09:01 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
...

What makes you a shill is that you deny what we all see, but you don't have any evidence to support your claims. Yes, you are definitely a shill.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58274657


There is no more evidence to support the claim of secureteam10.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1011606


And the raw data does support my claim.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Yes, but even if it's illogical, one can argue that the raw data could also have been altered.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1011606

The claim is that they obviously censored it. Where's the censor in the raw data? It's up to the claimant to show it was altered, it's not up to me to prove a negative.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 56177864
United States
05/20/2014 09:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
The video keeps saying error occured when I try to watch :( Anyone can screenshot? :/





GLP