>>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES

Happy early bday :)

Back on topic, I couldn't make it though the whole video. Usually in the morning I'm too mentally active to listen to a slow speaking video. I mean if you don't know what SOHO stands for you should look it up...

I wish there was an Internet 2.0 for more advanced studies...

Isn't it possible that they could be using the sun to refuel using helium 3 ?

"I shall call him Squishy and he shall be mine, and he shall be my Squishy"

If they didn't "edit" the pictures at all, this is what you would see:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
That's what the raw frame looks like before processing. I processed the raw data myself, here's what it looks like:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
No "giant UFO," no "censor" either. It's a glitch with the automated processing. They don't sit there all day manually processing each image, its handled by an automated system. Sometimes it screws up the image for one reason or another, but the youtuber who made the video claimed to show the "original unedited picture." He didn't. He lied. Here's the original unedited picture:
[link to h.dropcanvas.com]
If you want to get to the bottom of things like this GO TO THE RAW IMAGE DATA AND PROCESS IT YOURSELF. Don't know how many times I have to say that. It's becoming increasingly clear to me that those who scream UFO every time SOHO's automated processing system fucks up an image are themselves completely incompetent and have no idea how to get the raw data, let alone process it. It's all right there:
[link to sharpp.nrl.navy.mil]

Aw, Eireann, is it your birthday tomorrow? Happy Birthday!

Ok I finished video...

Certainly not Pleiades or parallax...

The glitch is between your ears. NASA edited it out. Also the 7 sisters does not look like that.

Obvious fail shilltard fail is obvious.

This is why I respect your opinion. You know how to solve these mysteries.

Thanks

Thanks for this link, it's pretty hard to find access to raw data.

could any smart guy figure out the size of that ship? considering the distance and parametres it seems the size of Mercury? correct me if im wrong.

if such ship is hanging in our solar system it should be visible in plain sight.

i lately saw some amazing flash in sky and mind couldnt believe it for first what i saw - but yeah there was huge flash and it dissapeared. never saw anything like that before.

If everyone would notice it appears to be the same craft spotted in google moon around the firs of the year.

Thanks. I just wish that those who know how to (and do) make youtube videos about these things also knew how to find and process the raw data. It would save a lot of wasted effort.

You mean this one?

Another textbook example of a mystery solved once again by going back to the raw data instead of using a pre-processed secondary source.

Can't raw data also be manipulated, nasa sees the anomalies and edits the raw data after the fact? I'm seriously asking.

Thank you, OP. Can you give a location on the video where UFO can be seen, time-wise? I've skipped around, because of all the blah blah blah at the beginning, and haven't seen it.

Wow...
They did it!@

5:40

Then where is the "censor?" It's not up to me to prove a negative, but the claim is that they just flat out censored it. Can't have it both ways; either they're capable of seamlessly and undetectably editing it out of the raw data, or they simply put a block in front of it in the much-easier-to-manipulate 8 bit processed jpg images.

bingo

If you wan to pusue this subject of life on the Sun in more depth you might want to read this book.

The Catholic church knows, but won't tell you unless you join their club and sell them your soul.

The Rosicrucian Cosmo-Connection
max Heindel 1920
Chapter XI
The Genesis and Evolution of Our Solar System

[link to www.rosicrucian.com]

It will explain much.

The Sun and Planets are now or have been inhabited. Not like you think though.

Have fun!

;hf:

I dont understand if it was a processing error why didnt it who the error the first time. And why did they re-process the data when they already processed it without the glitch.

not if it is closer to the lens then the sun.

Parallax-induced lens flare caused by the abnormal levels of swamp gas generated by the stream of steaming bullshit that flows from the mouth of NASA.

Your no fun... I bet you can't wait to tell little kids there is no Santa.
However, glad you caught these dudes I just waisted about 20min of my life on this.

People get played, to scam views. Works 99% of the time here

Bingo!

I cannot get the youtube video to play for me...strange.

I don't think we really understand that this isn't "real-time" data like looking through a webcam or viewing a live stream broadcast. We "mundanes" (that's photography illiterates) see the videos with the timestamps and forget that we are looking at single snapshots which are then strung together in a sequence. It's not like a live video feed would be, right?

The video doesn't provide any evidence about that. We have to trust them.
Most people here say that NASA isn't trustworthy, maybe, but IMO secureteam10 isn't trustworthy either.