>>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES

I do hope they come here to debate the issue, it looks like both Astro and I have contacted them. Maybe other folks should comment on this video on YT and ask them to come on here and debate. While I have no problem either believing this is a space ship and that NASA is lying, I'd like to see them discuss the data and their process, especially with someone like Astro. Maybe they ARE full of shit, I really don't know. But I certainly wouldn't assume it, and other folks have seen many strange things in the skies....some of which have GOT to be space ships, lot of averages. Unless you actually DO believe we are the only intelligent, building, traveling creatures in the universe which seems far-fetched to me.

Thread title is misleading, title says confirmed, yet in first post you say don't know... which is it. 1*

So I was right, you didn't set source to all, then you lied and said you did.

Have you tried the query?

[link to sharpp.nrl.navy.mil]

for 05/12/2014 @ 14:12

Bahahaha, you're a reverend. Yeah, that figures.

No, it's just me being a blind dumb ass ... I mixed up filter ALL and source ALL

My honest mistake! Sorry, brother!

Now, I'm checking out the pics. Thanks!

And what's wrong with being a Reverend? C'mon Astro, I believe that even YOU have a soul, LOL. It might even be a Pleidian soul! or Arcturan...or one of those other alien races I keep hearing about.

Will have a look...

No problem, glad it was just an honest mistake.

Interesting...I thought Astro was more of the Nordic Type...But yes Astro has a soul...

Nothing's wrong with being a reverend, but your personality perfectly fits a certain stereotype. Just wow.

Yeah ... This query is so fucking rediculous, its enough to make you scream.

Now I can see the friggin' file, I press JPG AND IT SAYS:

[link to i58.tinypic.com]

FORBIDDEN

...

What's it now, Astro? I'm desperate here lol

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!! Yes, you are probably right - I could see him as a Nordic too. So much better than having all those tentacles, but I'm just being anthropophile, I'm sure. But, on the other appendage...are we sure about his soul? It could just be swamp gas.....

Oh, and what stereotype is that? The one that tends to believe private citizens I don't know over the government I do?

Hmmmmm....More data testing should be done...I am sure it is not swamp gas...Although one never knows....LOL

Oh my god!
Let's hope it's the Borg coming to assimilate us.
We sure as hell need it!

To become part of the collective...

Cant believe I actually used to be believe some of the shit that Astro came out with, to say an automated process did this after a clear image was uploaded not long before the 'artifact' took its place just absolutely stinks of propaganda. Either that you just love to seem like you're the dogs bollocks on this tiny internet community. Lost all credibility with you. I'm even more skeptical now, something is up.

What is it with you and calling people Liars all the time?

same here...

Hey, he told me he set source to all, I took him at his word, then he shows me a screen shot where he clearly hasn't done that and is making a bigger and bigger deal out of not being able to find images I know can be found if he sets the setting I told him to set. Perhaps I should apply hanlon's razor more aggressively, but sadly I don't. Character flaw, ah well.

Thank you for checking things out with me! It's the only way to be sure.

Yet, again, we hit a dead end. Something's off, like your compatriot stated above.

Taking the word of NASA? What word? He said they had no comment.

The proper research is to check the raw data for yourself. Given that it shows he lied, I really don't care what he said.

Maybe you should just be more precise in your explanation on how to navigate through problematic queries. I'm a noob ... like I more or less stated in my very first post.

Still, the JPG is forbidden territory. There's no way to verify anything.

I wish I knew how to correctly get all the original data myself because this is very interesting. However, I will say: secureteam10 is one of the big YT UFO channels that frequently puts cgi fakes up. They usually only have an interest in clicks and views and don't really care about fake/not fake....so I'm quite skeptical. I want to believe though.

Would some math major type care to an estimation of the size of the "anomaly"? Since the sun is a known size, it should be possible to do a rough ratio equation.

As big as a small planet I would guesstimate.

Can it be determined of the object is beside/near the back/near the front of the sun?...And how from it...it is stationed?

Looks like the server went down, they might be updating it with new images. Why are you trying to go for the JPG's though? The Fits files are the raw data, not the JPGs.