Which city?? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 63121489 United States 09/23/2014 09:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ScoutsOUT
User ID: 26434285 United States 09/23/2014 09:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Most of us here know how this is going to be played. O is finally engaging, war engines are all fired up but he must show some political restraint, some righteous fakery.....until we are struck, yet again. Quoting: einsteinsfly Who are we going to blame? Which city is destined to become the momentous false flag this time around? Which city is steeped in their ritualistic symbolism? L.A.,City of angels? Phoenix? Las Vegas? Denver? The story line is rolling out....what's your call? Oh October, surprise, surprise... SF. It will be somewhere on the west coast so we can blame the radiation on the false flag as opposed to fukushima. "Be polite, be professional, be prepared to kill everyone you meet." What keeps you awake at night? "Nothing, I keep other people awake at night." Secretary of Defense, James Mattis |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22301087 United States 09/23/2014 09:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
fromthefuture
User ID: 55285701 United States 09/23/2014 09:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Bizarre Verewolf
User ID: 63174137 United States 09/23/2014 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ScoutsOUT
User ID: 26434285 United States 09/23/2014 09:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56009434 United States 09/23/2014 09:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If I HAD to bet, I'd say L.A., and I'd say some kind of nuke, and if this COULD trigger some kind of massive earthquake (and tsunami), it would also further reduce the population and give them two major disasters for the price of one. The reasons I would pick L.A. for this are: First, the person on a previous post who said they could blame the Fuku radiation on that made a very good point, I think. Second, L.A. and most of SoCal is so messed up and so overpopulated -- and there are also many illegals and people on welfare, combined with the fact that now only about 25% of L.A. is Caucasian -- that I think killing off much of the SoCal population would make sense to some of the people in power. Just a very sorry state of affairs that we are even discussing this subject, though. |
einsteinsfly
(OP) User ID: 51665820 United States 09/23/2014 12:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If I HAD to bet, I'd say L.A., and I'd say some kind of nuke, and if this COULD trigger some kind of massive earthquake (and tsunami), it would also further reduce the population and give them two major disasters for the price of one. The reasons I would pick L.A. for this are: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56009434 First, the person on a previous post who said they could blame the Fuku radiation on that made a very good point, I think. Second, L.A. and most of SoCal is so messed up and so overpopulated -- and there are also many illegals and people on welfare, combined with the fact that now only about 25% of L.A. is Caucasian -- that I think killing off much of the SoCal population would make sense to some of the people in power. Just a very sorry state of affairs that we are even discussing this subject, though. I think Los Angeles is a top choice as well. |