Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,299 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 602,220
Pageviews Today: 1,043,607Threads Today: 433Posts Today: 7,321
12:46 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77710510
South Korea
06/06/2019 10:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
[link to news.cgtn.com (secure)]

[link to news.cgtn.com (secure)]


Hi, Trish Regan. Hi, Liu Xin. It was wonderful to see you at such a nice debate, having two people actually talk to one another for a change, rather than making just broad generalizations. I just wanted to point out a few things, just so no one missed anything.
Trish. One of the things your great research team should have figured out is that Liu Xin is not a party member of the CPC (Communist Party of China). So as a result, you weren't talking to a monolithic body. You were actually talking to a very nice lady who was going to explain very reasonably what China is about, and how she viewed all of these events. 
Trish, there's one thing we need to get straight. And that is, let's put some context to this. In an earlier show, you said that China is responsible for 600 billion U.S. dollars of IP theft per year. And you called Chinese people and companies thieves. 
Liu Xin responded by saying, no, you shouldn't make general blanket statements about countries or people. And she questioned the 600-billion-dollar number.
Today, we got the answer. There's no 600-billion-dollar number because that number is an estimate, the highest estimate of world losses to IP, not China's responsibility.
And I think you would admit that it is not right to make blanket statements about people because you don't want them making blanket statements about you. Stereotypes are never nice.
Trish. After the show, you played what you thought was a "gotcha" moment. You said Liu Xin admitted, and you repeated it two or three times, that China steals IP. I'm going to give you a chance to not only see, but to replay exactly what Liu Xin said, which will show you that she was talking not about China, but about all human beings.
Now, when one company wants to work with another company in a new market, they get together, and they produce products and services. And as part of that process, there is technology that is transferred to the joint enterprise. This is called (an) international business. It happens all the time in the U.S., in Europe, in China, in Japan, everywhere.
So, when you start talking about forced transfer, I don't know if you mean that Chinese people are holding a gun to the head of people coming to China in order to make them sign agreements where they will, in essence, give their technology over. That doesn't make sense 
Trish, let's talk tariffs. You suggested that, wouldn't it be great if everything went to zero in terms of tariffs? I think you're right. And I would agree with that. But there are political realities. So let's talk about them. 
One of the reasons that the U.S. did not join (the) TPP, which was something that they were pushing for, was because it would have brought tariffs down too low.
Now, ironically, Donald Trump was just in Japan, asking for the same benefits that those in the TPP exchange with each other for the U.S. 
Now, the reality is that in most cases, countries have certain industries that they need to protect for political or for development reasons. That's why something called RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) (exists), which China and many other countries are pushing, which allows most countries to have a discretionary about five-percent tariff ability. 
This is to protect them, to allow them to politically govern. But over time, those can be reduced to zero. So, when you say it's something that we should all hope for, I would agree. And I think most people in China would also as well.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77710510
South Korea
06/06/2019 10:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
[link to www.german-foreign-policy.com (secure)]


Germany concludes Hua Wei 5G safer than USA 4G ❗

Germany has made a comprehensive comparison between the security of USA's 4G system and China's 5G system, and arrived at the following conclusions:

♦️1. In terms of data security although USA has constantly stressed the need for defense against Chinese and Russian internet spying, so far not a single case is known, to date, where the Chinese state or Chinese companies have surreptitiously installed "notorious kill switches that can shut down complete wireless network sectors."

In contrast the US has openly used its own 4G system to constantly spy on all users. Edward Snowden's released documents show "that the USA's NSA has infected tens of thousands of computers with a sleeper software, that can be activated at the flick of a switch and do whatever the US government wants it to do - even, if in doubt, shut down a foreign country's cellphone network.". [12] As the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP) has noted, meanwhile, "the US company Verizon's products are no longer being used in the network of the German government and parliament" - in order to prevent USA from continuing to spy on them.

♦️2. Since the US has also been constantly spying on all of Huawei's transactions for many decades, any secret disclosure by Huawei to the Chinese government would by now have been discovered, but to date the USA government has not been able to provide any proof of such data disclosure.

Hence the obvious conclusion is that Huawei's system is very much safer than any American system.
[link to www.german-foreign-policy.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77710510
South Korea
06/06/2019 10:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77710668
Canada
06/06/2019 11:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Wonder what the con man has to say about the disgraceful Tiananmen massacre now that it just passed the 30th anniversary?s226
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77643100
United States
06/07/2019 12:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Hi

I met with my friend, Bruce, yesterday who is decidedly NOT “New Age,” but he is open-minded. He is one of my friends that I gifted Currency to because he has always been a generous, kind, angel. He is the embodiment of the peaceful, caring, considerate, new world of the Golden Age of Gaia, whether he was aware of that term or not.

Two things he would like to do with his Currency is eradicate Homelessness in our area and remove the pollution from all the trees near the Pacific ocean in the small beach town we live in. Given the chance, he will do it. I do not doubt it.

Bruce has been holding Currency for 3 years, and has gradually become aware of the path that those of us on IDC have been trudging for decades.

When I met with Bruce yesterday, he was very excited: “Have you been hearing the news about UFO’s?”

“No,” I replied. Wasn’t sure what he was talking about. Which news? MSM, New Age? Internet? Blogs? Channels?

“It’s been all over the news. CNN, Fox, etc. People are seeing UFO’s everywhere. I think this is a good sign that things are really changing. People are so ready for change.”

Well, I said, if that’s the case, then we’re in the “Soft Disclosure” phase.

The New Powers That Are, are slowing Disclosing to the general population and this is one of the resolutions of GESARA—Disclosure:

“ET Disclosure of both humanoid and non-humanoid (extra-terrestrial) life in existence on the surface of Earth and throughout our galaxy.”

GESARA: No Poverty, No Hunger, No Debt, Global Prosperity and Peace / BlissfulVisions.com

Good! We might be a ways from Space Ships landing on the lawn of the White House… or maybe not.

Point is, Bruce felt this meant we were closer to the RV than ever and I agree with him, and I actually agree with Benjamin Fulford’s latest posting “Currency Reset Buzz,” which is incredible, because I generally disregard his posts, with respect.

I enclose a link to a May 26, 2019 New York Times article about UFO’s. Not that you have to read it, but it’s there, front and center, clearing the way for GESARA.

‘Wow, What Is That?’ Navy Pilots Report Unexplained Flying Objects

This is just my opinion and I could be totally incorrect. But I see this as very very positive.

Soft Disclosure, GESARA compliance, Reset Buzz… all very very positive.

Peace, Happiness and Prosperity to all,
xo, Kat
______________________
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77713737
Japan
06/08/2019 05:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Wonder what the con man has to say about the disgraceful Tiananmen massacre now that it just passed the 30th anniversary?s226
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77710668


Chinky chinaman has no guts to reply! Fucking commues committed all sorts of atrocities against innocents.
Fuck those chinks
Dien Bien Phu

User ID: 77713779
Vietnam
06/08/2019 06:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
I am sure the OP may not be able to respond to every bit of disinformation set out to demonize him and his people.
I understand the whole world media controlled the the six big media corporations WRONGED the Chinese during the Tianamen incident. I have relatives who were in China during that period and they told me that the western media really fabricated a lot of lies about the incident to villify China.

Here is an example of using a poor woman’s suffering to demonise her country:

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77715125
United States
06/08/2019 07:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77710510



scared
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77715125
United States
06/08/2019 07:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
[link to news.cgtn.com (secure)]

[link to news.cgtn.com (secure)]


Hi, Trish Regan. Hi, Liu Xin. It was wonderful to see you at such a nice debate, having two people actually talk to one another for a change, rather than making just broad generalizations. I just wanted to point out a few things, just so no one missed anything.
Trish. One of the things your great research team should have figured out is that Liu Xin is not a party member of the CPC (Communist Party of China). So as a result, you weren't talking to a monolithic body. You were actually talking to a very nice lady who was going to explain very reasonably what China is about, and how she viewed all of these events. 
Trish, there's one thing we need to get straight. And that is, let's put some context to this. In an earlier show, you said that China is responsible for 600 billion U.S. dollars of IP theft per year. And you called Chinese people and companies thieves. 
Liu Xin responded by saying, no, you shouldn't make general blanket statements about countries or people. And she questioned the 600-billion-dollar number.
Today, we got the answer. There's no 600-billion-dollar number because that number is an estimate, the highest estimate of world losses to IP, not China's responsibility.
And I think you would admit that it is not right to make blanket statements about people because you don't want them making blanket statements about you. Stereotypes are never nice.
Trish. After the show, you played what you thought was a "gotcha" moment. You said Liu Xin admitted, and you repeated it two or three times, that China steals IP. I'm going to give you a chance to not only see, but to replay exactly what Liu Xin said, which will show you that she was talking not about China, but about all human beings.
Now, when one company wants to work with another company in a new market, they get together, and they produce products and services. And as part of that process, there is technology that is transferred to the joint enterprise. This is called (an) international business. It happens all the time in the U.S., in Europe, in China, in Japan, everywhere.
So, when you start talking about forced transfer, I don't know if you mean that Chinese people are holding a gun to the head of people coming to China in order to make them sign agreements where they will, in essence, give their technology over. That doesn't make sense 
Trish, let's talk tariffs. You suggested that, wouldn't it be great if everything went to zero in terms of tariffs? I think you're right. And I would agree with that. But there are political realities. So let's talk about them. 
One of the reasons that the U.S. did not join (the) TPP, which was something that they were pushing for, was because it would have brought tariffs down too low.
Now, ironically, Donald Trump was just in Japan, asking for the same benefits that those in the TPP exchange with each other for the U.S. 
Now, the reality is that in most cases, countries have certain industries that they need to protect for political or for development reasons. That's why something called RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) (exists), which China and many other countries are pushing, which allows most countries to have a discretionary about five-percent tariff ability. 
This is to protect them, to allow them to politically govern. But over time, those can be reduced to zero. So, when you say it's something that we should all hope for, I would agree. And I think most people in China would also as well.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77710510


Nice find

applause2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19897341
Switzerland
06/08/2019 08:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77140765
Switzerland
06/08/2019 08:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77715509
Russia
06/08/2019 11:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77715509
Russia
06/08/2019 11:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Modern day slavery.



Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75601114
Mexico
06/09/2019 03:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
OP messaged this to be posted on his behalf.

His initial IP was banned when this post was attempted.





Wonder what the con man has to say about the disgraceful Tiananmen massacre now that it just passed the 30th anniversary?s226
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77710668


Chinky chinaman has no guts to reply! Fucking commues committed all sorts of atrocities against innocents.
Fuck those chinks
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77713737


Summer greetings and well wishes from the Orient. I trust the last period has been peaceful and fruitful. As such heartfelt goodwill issues bountifully.hf

Normally I do not respond to this, but I feel that with the big lying networks and matrices due to exposed, it is only right that the good work by honorable researchers and witnesses be put on record.

An associate found the following and had been generous in sharing.




What really happened at Tiananmen?


Over the years the “black information” people in the U.S. and U.K. governments have had some spectacular successes — the myth that the Vietnam War was due to Beijing using Hanoi as a puppet to head its advance into Asia, that Iraq harbored weapons of mass destruction, that Kosovar ethnic cleansing of Serbs in Kosovo was in fact Serbian ethnic cleansing of Kosovars, and now the claims that Moscow was responsible for the pro-Russian protesters in eastern Ukraine. But the greatest achievement of them all still has to be the myth of a June 4, 1989, Tiananmen Square massacre, with talk of hundreds if not thousands of protesting students mowed down by military machine guns.

In recent years the Tiananmen massacre story has taken something of a beating as people in the square that night, including a Spanish TV unit, have emerged to tell us that there was no massacre, that the only thing they saw was a military unit entering in the late evening and asking the several hundred students still there quietly to leave. So the “massacre” location has been moved to the streets around the square, and with the 25th anniversary of the event coming up we see the “unprovoked massacre” story being used for yet another round of Beijing bashing.



And the facts? Fortunately we have the detailed hourly reports from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, available on the Internet, to give us the true story.

Yes, there was something close to a massacre in those streets, with some of the units originally sent to clear the square of students turning their guns wildly on the crowds that had tried to block their approach. And to find out why the soldiers did such an atrocious thing we do not have to look much beyond those widely publicized photos of military buses in rows being set on fire by those protesting crowds.

To date the world seems to have assumed that those buses were fired by the crowds after the soldiers had started shooting. In fact it was the reverse — that the crowds attacked the buses as they entered Beijing, incinerating dozens of soldiers inside, and only then did the shooting begin. Here too we do need not go far to find the evidence — in the not publicized photos of soldiers with horrible burns seeking shelter in nearby houses, and reports of charred corpses being strung from overpasses.

True, the crowds had had their reasons for protesting. I traveled extensively in China in the early 1970s, soon after Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution movement was launched.

I saw firsthand the grotesque and insane abuse to which the entire nation had been subjected. If I had been a Chinese student or citizen in those days, I would have been among the protesters, even as late as 1989.

The regime seemed to realize this, which is why it tolerated the student protest in the square for six weeks despite the enormous loss of face and inconvenience. Its party secretary general even tried to negotiate. It only moved to take back the square after the negotiation failed and the students were beginning to disperse.

But by this time the crowds around the square were both large and ominous. The embassy reports note that the regime’s first move was to send in unarmed troops using the subways and easily blocked by the crowds. Armed troops were then sent in with the results we know. But even then only some of the units went berserk (soldiers tend to go that way when some of the comrades are barbecued: Ask the citizens of Fallujah, Iraq). Other units tried to restrain them. And the action was outside, not inside, the square.

So whence the machine-gun massacre claim? Here too we do not have to look far — to a story a week later in a pro-British, English-language Hong Kong newspaper written under the name of an alleged student demonstrator claiming to have fled China, but whom no one has been able to find. Front-paged by The New York Times on June 12, it quickly traveled the globe, and we have been living with it in one form or another ever since. Not a single Western reporter in Beijing that night seems to have bothered to check out what actually happened; presumably they found a much wider audience for their stories of blood and gore.

Fortunately in addition to the U.S. Embassy reports we now have a detailed 1998 study by the Columbia Journalism Review titled “Reporting the Myth of Tiananmen and the Price of a Passive Press” that tracks down “the dramatic reports that buttressed the myth of a student massacre.”

Right from the beginning we should have had our doubts about the “massacre” stories.

Why would a Beijing regime under Deng Xiaoping seeking reform in so many areas of Chinese society want so deliberately and viciously to attack harmless students, who traditionally have led the reform movements in China — which many pro-Communist leaders had joined in the past?

If one has to fault the regime it is in the failure to train troops in crowd control — a mistake that even hardline regime members later admitted. Ironically their later effort to import crowd control equipment was blocked by the United Kingdom acting under the Western arms embargo imposed as a result of the fictitious machine-gun massacre report that their own black information people had almost certainly helped create.

Other strange details later to emerge included a report that Reuters, the British new agency, refused to publish a photo of a charred corpse strung up under an overpass — a photo that would have done much to explain what had happened. And we now discover that the widely distributed photo of Tankman — the lone student standing before a row of army tanks and heavily publicised as showing brave defiance against a cruel regime — was in fact taken the day after Tiananmen events, and the tanks were moving away from, and not into, Tiananmen Square.

Some have noted the frustration a student leader calling for blood in the streets as the prolonged square protest was winding down with no seeming result, And some have asked how those protesters came to use gasoline bombs against the troops — a weapon not used by Chinese rioters — and why so many vehicles came to be destroyed. This in turn could explain the regime’s anger, and its subsequent efforts to track down and punish student leaders. But even without these details it should be clear that the so-called Tiananmen Square Massacre was not quite the clear-cut evil of much Western imagination



[link to www.japantimes.co.jp (secure)]
TaSeiKwaiLo

User ID: 77715948
Hong Kong
06/09/2019 04:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Very true’ lots of very naive and stupid Hong Kong students were enticed by 15 minutes of fame to go to Beijing to join some protest.
Our screwed up devil worshipper governor Chris Patten nurtured a lot of naive students and recruited a lot of operatives in the years prior to 1989. He with MI6 were trying to derail the handing back of Hong Kong to China.

They tried to collapse the Chinese government prior to destroying the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union.

Thank heavens the Chinese were resilient .
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33888115
United Kingdom
06/09/2019 06:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Lol why do you keep a failed thread going? This thread failed on Jan 1st 2018.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77716100
Russia
06/09/2019 07:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Very true’ lots of very naive and stupid Hong Kong students were enticed by 15 minutes of fame to go to Beijing to join some protest.
Our screwed up devil worshipper governor Chris Patten nurtured a lot of naive students and recruited a lot of operatives in the years prior to 1989. He with MI6 were trying to derail the handing back of Hong Kong to China.

They tried to collapse the Chinese government prior to destroying the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union.

Thank heavens the Chinese were resilient .
 Quoting: TaSeiKwaiLo


Intel was “ the global cabal “ wanted to break China into 6 regions.
Alas , they only succeeded in conning Gorbachev and Yeltsin...breaking up USSR...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77141943
United States
06/09/2019 01:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Op, please update us, what after this quiet period, Thanks
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77719736
New Zealand
06/11/2019 05:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Reset of CIA-North Korean relations after Trump won in 2016



WASHINGTON: Kim Jong Nam, the half-brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un who was killed in Malaysia in 2017, had been an informant for the US Central Intelligence Agency, the Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.

The Journal cited an unnamed “person knowledgeable about the matter” for the report, and said many details of Kim Jong Nam’s relationship with the CIA remained unclear.

Reuters could not independently confirm the story. The CIA declined to comment.

The Journal quoted the person as saying “There was a nexus” between the CIA and Kim Jong Nam.

“Several former US officials said the half brother, who had lived outside of North Korea for many years and had no known power base in Pyongyang, was unlikely to be able to provide details of the secretive country’s inner workings,“ the Journal said.

The former officials also said Kim Jong Nam had been almost certainly in contact with security services of other countries, particularly China’s, the Journal said.

South Korean and US officials have said the North Korean authorities had ordered the assassination of Kim Jong Nam, who had been critical of his family’s dynastic rule. Pyongyang has denied the allegation.

Two women were charged with poisoning Kim Jong Nam by smearing his face with liquid VX, a banned chemical weapon, at Kuala Lumpur International Airport in February 2017. The Malaysian government released Doan Thi Huong, who is Vietnamese, in May, and Indonesian Siti Aisyah in March.

According to the Journal, the person said Kim Jong Nam had traveled to Malaysia in February 2017 to meet his CIA contact, although that may not have been the sole purpose of the trip.

US President Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un have met twice, in Hanoi in February and Singapore last June, seeming to build personal goodwill but failing to agree on a deal to lift US sanctions in exchange for North Korea abandoning its nuclear and missile programs.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77385793
New Zealand
06/12/2019 05:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73439958
New Zealand
06/12/2019 05:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
OP messaged this to be posted on his behalf.

His initial IP was banned when this post was attempted.





Wonder what the con man has to say about the disgraceful Tiananmen massacre now that it just passed the 30th anniversary?s226
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77710668


Chinky chinaman has no guts to reply! Fucking commues committed all sorts of atrocities against innocents.
Fuck those chinks
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77713737


Summer greetings and well wishes from the Orient. I trust the last period has been peaceful and fruitful. As such heartfelt goodwill issues bountifully.hf

Normally I do not respond to this, but I feel that with the big lying networks and matrices due to exposed, it is only right that the good work by honorable researchers and witnesses be put on record.

An associate found the following and had been generous in sharing.




What really happened at Tiananmen?


Over the years the “black information” people in the U.S. and U.K. governments have had some spectacular successes — the myth that the Vietnam War was due to Beijing using Hanoi as a puppet to head its advance into Asia, that Iraq harbored weapons of mass destruction, that Kosovar ethnic cleansing of Serbs in Kosovo was in fact Serbian ethnic cleansing of Kosovars, and now the claims that Moscow was responsible for the pro-Russian protesters in eastern Ukraine. But the greatest achievement of them all still has to be the myth of a June 4, 1989, Tiananmen Square massacre, with talk of hundreds if not thousands of protesting students mowed down by military machine guns.

In recent years the Tiananmen massacre story has taken something of a beating as people in the square that night, including a Spanish TV unit, have emerged to tell us that there was no massacre, that the only thing they saw was a military unit entering in the late evening and asking the several hundred students still there quietly to leave. So the “massacre” location has been moved to the streets around the square, and with the 25th anniversary of the event coming up we see the “unprovoked massacre” story being used for yet another round of Beijing bashing.



And the facts? Fortunately we have the detailed hourly reports from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, available on the Internet, to give us the true story.

Yes, there was something close to a massacre in those streets, with some of the units originally sent to clear the square of students turning their guns wildly on the crowds that had tried to block their approach. And to find out why the soldiers did such an atrocious thing we do not have to look much beyond those widely publicized photos of military buses in rows being set on fire by those protesting crowds.

To date the world seems to have assumed that those buses were fired by the crowds after the soldiers had started shooting. In fact it was the reverse — that the crowds attacked the buses as they entered Beijing, incinerating dozens of soldiers inside, and only then did the shooting begin. Here too we do need not go far to find the evidence — in the not publicized photos of soldiers with horrible burns seeking shelter in nearby houses, and reports of charred corpses being strung from overpasses.

True, the crowds had had their reasons for protesting. I traveled extensively in China in the early 1970s, soon after Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution movement was launched.

I saw firsthand the grotesque and insane abuse to which the entire nation had been subjected. If I had been a Chinese student or citizen in those days, I would have been among the protesters, even as late as 1989.

The regime seemed to realize this, which is why it tolerated the student protest in the square for six weeks despite the enormous loss of face and inconvenience. Its party secretary general even tried to negotiate. It only moved to take back the square after the negotiation failed and the students were beginning to disperse.

But by this time the crowds around the square were both large and ominous. The embassy reports note that the regime’s first move was to send in unarmed troops using the subways and easily blocked by the crowds. Armed troops were then sent in with the results we know. But even then only some of the units went berserk (soldiers tend to go that way when some of the comrades are barbecued: Ask the citizens of Fallujah, Iraq). Other units tried to restrain them. And the action was outside, not inside, the square.

So whence the machine-gun massacre claim? Here too we do not have to look far — to a story a week later in a pro-British, English-language Hong Kong newspaper written under the name of an alleged student demonstrator claiming to have fled China, but whom no one has been able to find. Front-paged by The New York Times on June 12, it quickly traveled the globe, and we have been living with it in one form or another ever since. Not a single Western reporter in Beijing that night seems to have bothered to check out what actually happened; presumably they found a much wider audience for their stories of blood and gore.

Fortunately in addition to the U.S. Embassy reports we now have a detailed 1998 study by the Columbia Journalism Review titled “Reporting the Myth of Tiananmen and the Price of a Passive Press” that tracks down “the dramatic reports that buttressed the myth of a student massacre.”

Right from the beginning we should have had our doubts about the “massacre” stories.

Why would a Beijing regime under Deng Xiaoping seeking reform in so many areas of Chinese society want so deliberately and viciously to attack harmless students, who traditionally have led the reform movements in China — which many pro-Communist leaders had joined in the past?

If one has to fault the regime it is in the failure to train troops in crowd control — a mistake that even hardline regime members later admitted. Ironically their later effort to import crowd control equipment was blocked by the United Kingdom acting under the Western arms embargo imposed as a result of the fictitious machine-gun massacre report that their own black information people had almost certainly helped create.

Other strange details later to emerge included a report that Reuters, the British new agency, refused to publish a photo of a charred corpse strung up under an overpass — a photo that would have done much to explain what had happened. And we now discover that the widely distributed photo of Tankman — the lone student standing before a row of army tanks and heavily publicised as showing brave defiance against a cruel regime — was in fact taken the day after Tiananmen events, and the tanks were moving away from, and not into, Tiananmen Square.

Some have noted the frustration a student leader calling for blood in the streets as the prolonged square protest was winding down with no seeming result, And some have asked how those protesters came to use gasoline bombs against the troops — a weapon not used by Chinese rioters — and why so many vehicles came to be destroyed. This in turn could explain the regime’s anger, and its subsequent efforts to track down and punish student leaders. But even without these details it should be clear that the so-called Tiananmen Square Massacre was not quite the clear-cut evil of much Western imagination



[link to www.japantimes.co.jp (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75601114


Fake news and disinformation by all the major news corps and international agencies were not well known previously. The whole world swallowed all those fake allegations and accusations. The western world has no morals. Win at all cost. Lies after lies. Even with the current trade wars, endless lies anf false accusations.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77727817
Hong Kong
06/13/2019 04:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
First trade wars


Then misinfo wars

Disinfo wars too.

Sabotage trough CIA & MI6



Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77727817
Hong Kong
06/13/2019 04:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Professor Kishore Mahbubani


Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77727817
Hong Kong
06/13/2019 04:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Prof Mahbubani explaining the ....




Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31723025
South Korea
06/13/2019 07:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Blasted Hongkie, u making it all sound like chinky CPC propaganda! I don’t mind but they rest will be up in arms soon.
Using u and ur posts as an examples to fuck and discredit the OP.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77732595
India
06/15/2019 12:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
OP messaged this to be posted on his behalf.

His initial IP was banned when this post was attempted.





Wonder what the con man has to say about the disgraceful Tiananmen massacre now that it just passed the 30th anniversary?s226
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77710668


Chinky chinaman has no guts to reply! Fucking commues committed all sorts of atrocities against innocents.
Fuck those chinks
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77713737


Summer greetings and well wishes from the Orient. I trust the last period has been peaceful and fruitful. As such heartfelt goodwill issues bountifully.hf

Normally I do not respond to this, but I feel that with the big lying networks and matrices due to exposed, it is only right that the good work by honorable researchers and witnesses be put on record.

An associate found the following and had been generous in sharing.





 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75601114

op, please understand this, there are hardly any people who enjoy peace and quiet, people are just going through the motions

Thread: What a prison life we all live every day... Get up, go to work for 8-12 hours, rinse and repeat every day for the rest if your life.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77732595
India
06/15/2019 12:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
OP messaged this to be posted on his behalf.

His initial IP was banned when this post was attempted.





Wonder what the con man has to say about the disgraceful Tiananmen massacre now that it just passed the 30th anniversary?s226
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77710668


Chinky chinaman has no guts to reply! Fucking commues committed all sorts of atrocities against innocents.
Fuck those chinks
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77713737


Summer greetings and well wishes from the Orient. I trust the last period has been peaceful and fruitful. As such heartfelt goodwill issues bountifully.hf

Normally I do not respond to this, but I feel that with the big lying networks and matrices due to exposed, it is only right that the good work by honorable researchers and witnesses be put on record.

An associate found the following and had been generous in sharing.




What really happened at Tiananmen?


Over the years the “black information” people in the U.S. and U.K. governments have had some spectacular successes — the myth that the Vietnam War was due to Beijing using Hanoi as a puppet to head its advance into Asia, that Iraq harbored weapons of mass destruction, that Kosovar ethnic cleansing of Serbs in Kosovo was in fact Serbian ethnic cleansing of Kosovars, and now the claims that Moscow was responsible for the pro-Russian protesters in eastern Ukraine. But the greatest achievement of them all still has to be the myth of a June 4, 1989, Tiananmen Square massacre, with talk of hundreds if not thousands of protesting students mowed down by military machine guns.

In recent years the Tiananmen massacre story has taken something of a beating as people in the square that night, including a Spanish TV unit, have emerged to tell us that there was no massacre, that the only thing they saw was a military unit entering in the late evening and asking the several hundred students still there quietly to leave. So the “massacre” location has been moved to the streets around the square, and with the 25th anniversary of the event coming up we see the “unprovoked massacre” story being used for yet another round of Beijing bashing.



And the facts? Fortunately we have the detailed hourly reports from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, available on the Internet, to give us the true story.

Yes, there was something close to a massacre in those streets, with some of the units originally sent to clear the square of students turning their guns wildly on the crowds that had tried to block their approach. And to find out why the soldiers did such an atrocious thing we do not have to look much beyond those widely publicized photos of military buses in rows being set on fire by those protesting crowds.

To date the world seems to have assumed that those buses were fired by the crowds after the soldiers had started shooting. In fact it was the reverse — that the crowds attacked the buses as they entered Beijing, incinerating dozens of soldiers inside, and only then did the shooting begin. Here too we do need not go far to find the evidence — in the not publicized photos of soldiers with horrible burns seeking shelter in nearby houses, and reports of charred corpses being strung from overpasses.

True, the crowds had had their reasons for protesting. I traveled extensively in China in the early 1970s, soon after Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution movement was launched.

I saw firsthand the grotesque and insane abuse to which the entire nation had been subjected. If I had been a Chinese student or citizen in those days, I would have been among the protesters, even as late as 1989.

The regime seemed to realize this, which is why it tolerated the student protest in the square for six weeks despite the enormous loss of face and inconvenience. Its party secretary general even tried to negotiate. It only moved to take back the square after the negotiation failed and the students were beginning to disperse.

But by this time the crowds around the square were both large and ominous. The embassy reports note that the regime’s first move was to send in unarmed troops using the subways and easily blocked by the crowds. Armed troops were then sent in with the results we know. But even then only some of the units went berserk (soldiers tend to go that way when some of the comrades are barbecued: Ask the citizens of Fallujah, Iraq). Other units tried to restrain them. And the action was outside, not inside, the square.

So whence the machine-gun massacre claim? Here too we do not have to look far — to a story a week later in a pro-British, English-language Hong Kong newspaper written under the name of an alleged student demonstrator claiming to have fled China, but whom no one has been able to find. Front-paged by The New York Times on June 12, it quickly traveled the globe, and we have been living with it in one form or another ever since. Not a single Western reporter in Beijing that night seems to have bothered to check out what actually happened; presumably they found a much wider audience for their stories of blood and gore.

Fortunately in addition to the U.S. Embassy reports we now have a detailed 1998 study by the Columbia Journalism Review titled “Reporting the Myth of Tiananmen and the Price of a Passive Press” that tracks down “the dramatic reports that buttressed the myth of a student massacre.”

Right from the beginning we should have had our doubts about the “massacre” stories.

Why would a Beijing regime under Deng Xiaoping seeking reform in so many areas of Chinese society want so deliberately and viciously to attack harmless students, who traditionally have led the reform movements in China — which many pro-Communist leaders had joined in the past?

If one has to fault the regime it is in the failure to train troops in crowd control — a mistake that even hardline regime members later admitted. Ironically their later effort to import crowd control equipment was blocked by the United Kingdom acting under the Western arms embargo imposed as a result of the fictitious machine-gun massacre report that their own black information people had almost certainly helped create.

Other strange details later to emerge included a report that Reuters, the British new agency, refused to publish a photo of a charred corpse strung up under an overpass — a photo that would have done much to explain what had happened. And we now discover that the widely distributed photo of Tankman — the lone student standing before a row of army tanks and heavily publicised as showing brave defiance against a cruel regime — was in fact taken the day after Tiananmen events, and the tanks were moving away from, and not into, Tiananmen Square.

Some have noted the frustration a student leader calling for blood in the streets as the prolonged square protest was winding down with no seeming result, And some have asked how those protesters came to use gasoline bombs against the troops — a weapon not used by Chinese rioters — and why so many vehicles came to be destroyed. This in turn could explain the regime’s anger, and its subsequent efforts to track down and punish student leaders. But even without these details it should be clear that the so-called Tiananmen Square Massacre was not quite the clear-cut evil of much Western imagination



[link to www.japantimes.co.jp (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75601114



So China didn't see this coming, like iraq/syria didn't see ISIS coming.

we always hear that cabal did this or that, so the good guys were sleeping when they planned, started executing there plans etc.

Why do good people always react when water crosses over head...

Op, you can't make peace or negotiate with a mosquito, its life purpose is to suck blood , either understand this and kill the mosquito or accept that you will be killed as mosquitos will multiply ....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77732595
India
06/15/2019 01:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
I recall this thread had 7 mil+ views, now its 1.7mil?

anyone would like to comment

mandela effect?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77734163
Hong Kong
06/16/2019 03:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77734290
United States
06/16/2019 04:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Timelines To A Global Reset 2016-2017
What Is The Global Reset

There is more than one meaning that is attached to the phrase Global Currency Reset. A standard definition would be a return to a global currency system that all nations would agree upon. The last time nations gathered together to agree upon a new global currency system was in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. While World War II was still going on leaders from nations around the world decided on a new global currency system. This led to the formation of global organizations like the International Monetary Fund and GATT, which later became the World Trade Organization.

The world’s allied nations agreed on a fixed currency rate which was sort of based on a global gold standard. The U.S. dollar was the currency that nations used to back their currency under this agreement. The reason for this was because the United States was in possession of most of the world’s gold supply at this time.

America benefited greatly from this new currency system and the dollar made its way into central banks around the world. In time we left the fixed rate system. Richard Nixon stopped backing U.S. dollars with gold globally in 1971. This was known as the Nixon Shock. Today all the major currencies float on a global market. While some things have changed we are still on the remnants of the Bretton Woods System. Many Central Banks still have the dollar in their reserves and it remains in high demand today.
After the 2008 global meltdown, many have speculated that we are going to return to another gold standard. Some believe that there will be another monetary system altogether. Many armchair economists have emerged to claim that some nations may even base their currency values on their resources. The claim is that all currencies will revalue based on the countries’ assets. This will cause gold to skyrocket as people begin to seek a hedge of protection from depleting currency values.

The problem with this theory is that there are major obstacles to overcome. First, central banks around the world would need to agree to this and this would put major constraints on their monetary policies. Second, there would need to be a lot of cooperation with governments from all over the world in order to implement this new system or to return to an older system. Some nations would gain from this while others would lose. Third, nations would want to preserve their wealth while moving to a new system. If most of their wealth is in dollars then this will present a problem. Fourth, global organizations like the IMF, the WTO, and The World Bank, are relics from the Bretton Woods era. They would fight to have a relevant role in the new system.

So these same armchair economists predict that the dollar is going to collapse in a night. They claim the whole global economy is going to come crashing down in a day. This will force nations around the world to negotiate a new global currency system. Many cite the 2008 economic crisis as proof of a coming collapse. Others rewrite history and insert bad economic theories as proof.

Today the Global Currency Reset has become a major conspiracy theory that believes the dollar will crash. This theory proclaims that nations around the world will abandon the dollar. As a result, people have started to prepare for a future dollar crash. They invest in precious metals, they buy foreign currencies, and many have even become preppers and they stockpile food. This conspiracy theory has become big business as many people have made money selling several different types of items that relate to a belief in an any minute overnight dollar collapse.

This belief system has many converts and it is cultic in nature. Part of the belief system has its origins in New Age philosophies, while other parts of this belief system are tied into biblical prophecy. As a result, new converts are made all the time and people are driven more by emotion and their worldview rather than being driven by sound economic advice and principles.



“The Truth About The Coming Global Currency Reset” reveals the conspiracy theories and debunks all of their beliefs. It corrects the rewriting of history and it also corrects the junk economics used by propagandists to recruit more people into this belief system. It provides a list of sources that will help the reader do their own research and come to their own conclusions.



SIGNS THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL RESET HAS BEGUN
Dr. Kirk Elliott, PhD, ThD

After and economic recession/depression DEBT IS ALWAYS REDUCED. In the US, the recession of 2009 did not eliminate debt, in fact the opposite—IT EXPLODED not just in the US but globally. In fact, debt has been exploding since then and REAL GDP has been CONTRACTING by -2 to -4% a year in real terms according to John Williams of Shadow Stats.

CIPS (Cross Border Interbank Payment System (started Oct 2018),but is now gaining much momentum. Now commands $6-$8 TRILLION portfolio of funded projects. This is designed to replace the SWIFT system in the eastern hemisphere.

MARCH 2019 the Chinese rolled out a new gold-backed yuan oil contract next month aspart of its attempt to replace the US dollar’s dominance of that commodity trade. This could spell the end of the petro dollar trade. This built in demand for the US$ is pretty much all the demand there is for it. In time, the dollar sinks, and an alternative petro-dollar HAS ALREADY BEEN FORMED—no need to even speculate.

By this time everyone is aware of the BRICS nations and the coalition to form a strength based union to counteract thewest. BRICS 2.0 is that movement on steroids. Gold is one of the last commodities controlled by the west (NY and LONDON exchanges). This initiative will co-align the BRICS nations to replace that as well. This ismy opinion is not a bad thing, as London has allowed naked shorts on futures contracts of metals for a long time, thus limiting the growth through manipulation. People who own gold and continue to acquire it should benefit AMAZINGLY as a true market will be established without the manufactured suppression of prices. Sadly, for us as Americans, this one is on us. Our regulators allowed the manipulation to happen, and people seek truth and transparency. This is another nail in the coffin of US financial dominance







GLP