Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,180 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,786,279
Pageviews Today: 2,626,962Threads Today: 717Posts Today: 14,883
09:21 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

A Trillion Ways To Build A New Military Industrial Complex

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 63922993
Switzerland
10/11/2014 05:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
A Trillion Ways To Build A New Military Industrial Complex
A Trillion Ways To Build A New Military Industrial Complex

Print This Post Print This Post By Bob Hennelly on Oct 11, 2014

Just when did the United States government start referring to the country as the “homeland?”

If you were to answer “after 9/11,” you would be wrong. That’s the surprise. What is not at all surprising is the exponential expansion of what some call the “security-industrial complex” since that day in September thirteen years ago.

What’s happening now—the government’s search for self-justifying excuses to claim broader powers against a menace it says is ubiquitous—is a cycle that’s been repeated since America launched its first “War on Drugs” in the 1930s.

Today’s on-going proliferation of the national security state has created a new profit center for a large number of American companies with deep ties to military and intelligence agencies. And as bureaucracies and profits have grown, personal liberties have suffered their biggest contraction in a century, thanks to the Patriot Act and other legislation designed to increase surveillance in the name of eternal vigilance.

1And here’s the irony: It all began before 9/11, with the kind of bipartisan commission usually convened to bury a hot-potato issue beneath a slurry of platitudes.

***

In 1998, President Bill Clinton tasked former Senators Gary Hart, a Colorado Democrat, and the late Warren Rudman, a New Hampshire Republican, to chair the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century. The Commission panel was a cross-section of the military-industrial-media complex. Its members included Leslie Gelb, longtime New York Times correspondent and editor; Norman Augustine, former CEO of Lockheed-Martin; and Army General John Galvin.

Not If, but… When

The panel gave its report and recommendations in January 2001. Both Senators Rudman and Hart concluded that it was not a matter of “if” the U.S. would suffer a mass-casualty terrorist strike but “when.” Among the panel’s recommendations was the massive integration of all of the nation’s domestic security, disaster planning and recovery functions into one behemoth called the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

After 9/11, President George W. Bush faithfully executed the Hart-Rudman blueprint and President Obama and the Congress have continued to commit hundreds of billions to it. And so it was that the envisioned “peace dividend” cutbacks—which the end of the Cold War was supposed to have brought to the defense budget (and the bottom line of defense contractors)— were buried for good.

Read more here: [link to whowhatwhy.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 63687105
United States
10/11/2014 05:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: A Trillion Ways To Build A New Military Industrial Complex
Or we could just invade Switzerland and take all the elites money that the Swiss whores are holding for the elites.





GLP