Just had an idea RE: gravity and radiation. would like to hear your thoughts.

Thinking on this further, I believe I can explain this better.


When a frequency (beam of light) encounters gravity (a star in this case) on one side, the oscillation is assisted when the peak is towards the source of gravity. Equally opposite the oscillation is resisted when it peaks away from the source of gravity.

If it is the mass in the light beam that oscillates, this would hold true.


The difference of magnitude and curve between wave peaks (one near source of gravity, the other away fro source of gravity) cancels each other out.

As the oscillations swing towards gravity occurs faster, the return away from gravity takes longer.

In effect, a form of compression and expansion on the frequency, oscillation of the particle.


Here the speed of the particle is not interfered with. The motion side to side (the frequency of) is what encounters resistance and assistance opposite of phase.


I believe this is how the frequency is reduced in oscillations per second with out reducing the speed of the particle.



If this is true, the we should see particles of light with a frequency SOOOO low, it appears as a high energy particle with out a frequency. We do see these in space.


It would also be true that lower frequencies would become more common in the ambient universe. Could this explain the residual back ground heat in the universe? Considering I do not believe in the big bang, it becomes a good explanation.



Suppose this is how gravity is powered? By electromagnetic interaction perpendicular to the vector of the EM radiation and matter (matter being the place holder for the effect of gravity to manifest from EM radiation.)