Iran can produce 2,500km range land attack cruise missiles | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68752232 United States 04/04/2015 08:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Solar Guardian
(OP) User ID: 68815492 Malaysia 04/04/2015 08:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It seems like they have lots of options for retaliation if they were to be attacked. I wonder at what rate they can produce these weapons annually, based on their budget and production capacity. 50 per year? |
Solar Guardian
(OP) User ID: 68815492 Malaysia 04/04/2015 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think the advantage of cruise missiles, is that they are much more cheaper to produce than ballistic missiles. Is that right? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51058537 Finland 04/04/2015 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68737043 United Kingdom 04/04/2015 08:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And if fired from a container ship - it could be launched undetected, unattributed and strike anywhere on earth - perfect for a regime of pschotic clerics who believe that 'the world must be drenched in bloodshed and horror' to set the stage for the return of their Mahdi. |
Solar Guardian
(OP) User ID: 68815492 Malaysia 04/04/2015 08:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Aren't cruise missiles easy to shoot down? Ballistic warheads are difficult to shoot down because of their extreme speed, but cruise missile are like planes. Easy prey to SAMs and modern fighters? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 51058537 Yes. But because they are much more cheaper to produce than ballistic missiles, they can be fired en masse in large-scale saturation attacks on high-value strategic targets. |
Solar Guardian
(OP) User ID: 68815492 Malaysia 04/04/2015 08:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Imagine what would happen if Iran gave these weapons to Hezbollah? Last Edited by Solar Guardian on 04/04/2015 08:55 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68818726 United States 04/04/2015 09:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68648053 United States 04/04/2015 09:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How many countries have nukes, and if the US was the only country with nukes, how did countries like india and PAKISTAN get them? I think pakistan having nukes is more dangerous then iran but since pakistan isnt in the middle east I guess its a non issue |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12670917 Philippines 04/04/2015 09:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
pete User ID: 58912052 United States 04/04/2015 09:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Who has iran attacked in the last 200 hundred plus years.Here they answer no one.Know lets see about the good old u.s.a were to 235 years old and we been at war for all but 5 years who the threat to who and were the only country to use nukes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1702031 United Kingdom 04/04/2015 12:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It seems like they have lots of options for retaliation if they were to be attacked. I wonder at what rate they can produce these weapons annually, based on their budget and production capacity. 50 per year? Quoting: Solar Guardian Well after this nuclear deal the sanctions will be lifted and Iran will become very rich. They can produce thousanda. Why shouldn't they, after all they are threatened with bombings by US and israel all the time. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68785563 Portugal 04/04/2015 12:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68818726 United States 04/04/2015 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64722365 United States 04/04/2015 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 68806402 United States 04/06/2015 07:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |